49 pages • 1 hour read
Lulu MillerA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Lulu Miller opens Why Fish Don’t Exist by reminding the reader that chaos eventually comes for everything including the places and people we love the most. It is “the only sure thing in the world. The master that rules us all” (3). She introduces David Starr Jordan, a taxonomist who fought against chaos in the world by working for decades to discover and name a fifth of all the fish species that are known today. When an earthquake shattered the jars containing thousands of species he collected, he responded by carefully sewing the names of species onto their bodies. Miller describes how early in her career as a science journalist, this act seemed to her a sign of overconfidence in humanity’s ability to resist chaos. Yet as she grew older, she began to see a kind of nobility in Starr’s unwillingness to surrender to chaos, and she set out to discover more.
In Chapter 1, Miller writes that David Jordan was born in 1851 in New York state and was interested in ordering nature from a young age, learning all the names of the stars in the night sky (for which he was allowed to choose ‘Starr’ for his middle name). From here, Jordan turned to more terrestrial concerns, and mapped as much of his family’s farm as he could. Miller writes that Jordan was out of step with the times in this preoccupation. The early modern interest in taxonomy had started to wane in the 19th century because so much of the world had been discovered, or so people thought. Jordan was also out of alignment with his mother, who destroyed his maps. But the boy was undeterred and continued to learn the scientific names of plants he encountered, sometimes in the company a farmer named Joshua Ellenwood who knew the scientific names for all the plants in the region. Then, at age 11, he lost his brother Rufus to typhus. In the aftermath, Jordan pursued the naming of nature with even more passion and went on to study science at Cornell University. His passion for taxonomy was still of marginal interest to broader society, however, and Miller closes the chapter by noting that he would have remained in obscurity, had he not gone to Penikese Island.
Penikese Island, off the coast of Massachusetts, has been many things: a leper colony, bird sanctuary, a reform school for wayward boys. In the present day, it is an addiction recovery center, but in David Starr Jordan’s time, it was a site of interest for naturalists concerned with the state of their trade. In the late 19th century, Louis Agassiz, a leading Swiss naturalist, was concerned that science had moved away from direct observation of the natural world. When a wealthy landowner offered to donate Penikese Island to create a training camp for young naturalists, he seized the opportunity. Soon, Jordan, who was living in Illinois by then, found out about Agassiz’s “Course of Instruction in Natural History to be Delivered By the Seaside,” applied, and was accepted (21). Once on the Island, Agassiz explained to the young students that they were searching for God in nature, believing “the work of taxonomy is literally to “translat[e] into human language…the thoughts of the Creator” (25).
Miller explains that for Agassiz, nature contained a moral code written into the hierarchy of species, explaining that such an idea has a history that dates back at least as far as Aristotle, who thought all organisms could be arranged in a ladder, with humans at the top. For Agassiz, this hierarchy was most visible under the skin: “Agassiz explained that the best way to get to God was with a scalpel. To split the skin and look inside” (26). By closely examining nature, Agassiz thought humans could derive lessons about how to behave in the most morally correct way—including the lessons that descending to the level of beasts is possible, if one did not act in a morally upstanding way.
In the final section of the chapter, Miller recreates Jordan’s first night on the island, lying in the dormitory where female and male attendees were only separated by a piece of sailcloth. In a prank, some male students threw their bedding over a rafter. In response, Agassiz sent six men home, but Jordan was not among them because he had been selected to participate in the first dredging mission, collecting fish from the ocean—an act that would set off a lifetime of scientific inquiry.
Miller starts Chapter 3 musing if Cape Cod is “fertile ground for existential transformation,” given the fundamental shift in worldview she experienced while visiting the area—which is a short distance from Penikese Island—with her family, as a child. Gazing out at the marsh, Miller asked her father about the meaning of life. In response, her father, who was “a lively man, a biochemist with shaky hands who studies ions, the particles that carry the electricity that powers all life,” told her that there wasn’t one, nor was there a God (34). Instead, he said, there was only chaos.
From here, Miller goes on to describe her father, who often ignores rules and recipes, enjoys pranks and drinks large amounts of beer. He nonetheless lives by a moral code, Miller says—to treat people as though they matter, even if they don’t, and therefore often invited students from his university classes to share meals or stay with the family. Miller writes that she has tried to live by his example, “to stare out pointlessness in the face, and waddle along toward happiness because of it” (36). Nonetheless, she struggled to do so; as a child, she saw her oldest sister bullied so intensely she dropped out of high school. In time, Miller had a similar experience, as her classmates made fun of her clothes and mocked her appearance. For their father, this struggle was a source of impatience and frustration. At 16, Miller no longer saw any relief on the horizon. She overdosed on sleeping pills. Later, waking up in the hospital, she vowed next time to “do it right” (39).
Yet once in college, things started to improve. One day, Miller writes that she saw a sign of hope in a man she slowly befriended, and ultimately formed a romantic relationship with. After graduation, they moved to Brooklyn together where Miller began producing a radio show about science. She writes that the home they built together formed the kind of refuge she thought would never exist. Seven years into their relationship, Miller was unfaithful to her partner, and he told her it was over. Miller was initially consumed by a sense of meaningless. She beat back that tide by writing letters and emails to her former partner, turning to Jordan as a model of persistence.
Miller writes that the religious nature of Jordan’s experiences on Penikese Island were a source of concern for her because she is an atheist. Ultimately, though, she identified with Jordan’s embrace of Charles Darwin, who had become a hugely influential figure by the time Jordan was working. Darwin questioned the division of species into inflexible categories, as his work on evolution showed they were more mutable than anyone believed. While people like Louis Agassiz rejected this notion, Jordan reluctantly embraced it, following the path of science, for which Miller writes she felt she could “could keep using him as my guide” (43).
Chapter 4 opens with Miller describing Jordan beginning to focus on freshwater fish, even as he moved from job to job in the Midwest. Along with a former classmate named Herbert Copeland, Miller began focusing on the connections between species. Eventually, Jordan was hired by the government to travel to new states, in search of undiscovered fish species, including in 1880, when he was sent to the Pacific Coast, to catalogue fish species there as part of the US Census. While there, he became interested in marine species like tuna and flying fish, and he advanced a theory that combined Darwin’s discoveries of evolution with Agassiz’s ideas about moral degeneration. Jordan speculated that a species known as the sea squirt had devolved from a fish thanks to “a combination of “idleness,” “inactivity and dependence” (49). Jordan also studied the people and other species around him, adopting their fishing techniques into his own practices. As a result, he identified eighty new species of trip on that trip.
Soon afterwards, Jordan became a professor science at Indiana University. He married Susan Bowen, who had also attended the naturalist camp on Penikese Island, and the couple went on to have three children. Then, after six years of teaching, Jordan was named president of the university—a rapid rise in influence and status that Miller attribute to Jordan’s ‘Purpose.’ But Jordan was not without setbacks. In 1883, Miller writes that a lightning strike led to fire in Jordan’s lab. The jars of fish species that he had collected exploded—“Every last specimen was destroyed” (51). A document Jordan had been working on that mapped the tree of life was also destroyed. Yet Jordan didn’t linger on his grief. Instead, he quickly resumed collecting.
When his wife Susan was killed by pneumonia, he bounced back in a similar way and even remarried to a younger woman named Jessie Knight, who joined him on his collecting trips (after sending his eldest children to boarding school). In time, Jordan was recruited by a wealthy couple, Leland and Jane Stanford, who were starting a new academic institution in Palo Alto, California—Stanford University. Just as he turned forty, Jordan became the school’s founding president. In front of the new building that Jordan had built as a seaside observatory, there was a statue of Jordan’s mentor, Louis Agassiz, even though Agassiz was a proponent of “one of the most hateful and destructive fallacies in scientific history,” the belief that human races are different species and that some races—namely, Black people—were subhuman (55).
Meanwhile, Jordan and his new wife moved into a small cottage near the laboratory along with a menagerie of pets. In time, they also had two children, including a daughter named Barbara, considered by Jordan his ‘most lovable’ child (57). He also embarked on increasingly ambitious collecting expeditions to places as far away as Samoa, Switzerland, and Japan. These trips were criticized by Jane Stanford, who wanted Jordan to spend less time studying fish and more time studying spiritualism. Jordan resisted these entreaties—“one of his favorite pastimes was debunking mediums,” Miller writes—and this resistance caused increasing conflict with Jane Stanford (58). At the close of the chapter, Miller writes that as a protection against the indignities of this struggle, Jordan sought comfort in fish.
In the first four chapters of Why Fish Don’t Exist, author Lulu Miller introduces the character of David Starr Jordan, explains Jordan’s significance in her own life, and lays out three of the books core themes: the role of naming (and specifically, taxonomy) in creating order out of chaos, the role of chaos in human life, and the importance of persistence.
Miller introduces the concept of chaos in the first pages of the book, inviting the reader to “picture the person you love the most” and then to imagine that “chaos will get them” (3). In this case, ‘chaos’ can mean anything from a stray bullet to cancer. Above all, it means the undermining of carefully laid plans. This is exemplified twice in the prologue: The destruction of Jordan’s carefully labelled fish samples in an earthquake and Miller’s own personal cataclysm. The theme will reoccur throughout these chapters. In Jordan’s life, he encountered chaos both professionally and personally. His laboratory and all the work within it burned after a lightning strike in 1883; later, his brother died from typhus and his wife from pneumonia. Miller’s life was brushed by chaos too, starting from her childhood experience of asking her father about the meaning of life and having him tell her it was ‘nothing,’ to the loss of a long-term relationship due to her act of infidelity. By describing these instances of chaos in her life and the life of her subject, Miller is laying out why chaos is the underlying principle of all existence, which serves to underscore the hubris—or potentially, the admirable persistence, depending on one’s perspective—of trying to create order from chaos.
These chapters also introduce the concept of taxonomy, explaining its history and key figures before exploring its broader philosophical and scientific importance. For Miller, it reflects a psychological need to create categories in nature. She writes that a taxonomist is a “scientist charged with bringing order to the Chaos of the earth by uncovering the shape of the great tree of life—that branching map said to reveal how all plants and animals are interconnected” (3-4). Miller describes in Chapter 1 how Jordan was interested in taxonomy from a young age—naming all the plants he could find on his farm in New York state, as well as other parts of the world around him, such as the stars—and in doing so, he was part of a long line of scholars who have sought to order nature from Aristotle to Lucretius to Jordan’s contemporaries like Louis Agassiz.
As Miller explains in these chapters, interest in taxonomy was waning by Jordan’s day, as people thought much of the world had already been discovered. Jordan proved them wrong, discovering significant numbers of fish species on his expeditions in the Midwest and on the Pacific coast. Nonetheless, as Miller writes, taxonomy was not an unchallenged discipline, and Charles Darwin’s work on evolution showed that species categories were not as impermeable as people thought. In discussing the contentious nature of taxonomy and the waxing and waning interest in it, Miller is showing how systems of thought emerge and are challenged. Something as apparently timeless and stable as taxonomy is also affected by chaos.
Finally, these chapters explore the importance of persistence, which Miller also associates with purpose. She asks in Chapter 4, “How does a man go so quickly from being unnoticed by the human world—mocked for his pursuits and occasionally even abused—to being exalted by it?” (50). The answer, she says, is purpose. This is what led David Starr Jordan to become president of the newly formed Stanford University even after he’d been discouraged from pursuing his interests by his parents. Purpose kept him motivated through a string of dissatisfying jobs until his talent for taxonomy was recognized. These human obstacles were augmented by the strokes of bad luck such as the loss of family members and of carefully collected research. Despite the challenges, Miller writes, Jordan did not give up but instead learned “to push harder” (52). In a similar way, Miller shows the value of persistence in her own life, including in her drive to pursue the man she liked in college and in winning him back when their seven-year relationship was broken off. Miller shows how persistence is a factor in her life and a thread that connects her to Jordan.
Animals in Literature
View Collection
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Common Reads: Freshman Year Reading
View Collection
Equality
View Collection
Inspiring Biographies
View Collection
Philosophy, Logic, & Ethics
View Collection
Power
View Collection
Safety & Danger
View Collection
Science & Nature
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection
Truth & Lies
View Collection