36 pages • 1 hour read
Roberta EdwardsA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Edwards establishes the complexity of ancient Egypt’s economy, as well as its systems of religious belief, trade networks, and agriculture. The ancient civilization is presented as a thriving society comprised of several major metropolises that were fully supported by a major network of food and goods production. The author also emphasizes the vital role of the Nile in supporting Egyptian civilization and acting as the “heart” (8) of ancient Egypt. This metaphor stresses the vital role of the Nile in sustaining life, for just as a person cannot live without a heart, a civilization of permanent structures could never have sprung up in the desert without a reliable water source to irrigate farmland and sustain people and animals alike. Unlike the arid desert, the Nile banks remained lush and fertile, supporting abundant life and growth. As Edwards states:
All along the riverbanks was rich farmland. Peasant farmers tilled their fields with plows pulled by oxen. They sprinkled seeds in the soil to grow wheat and vegetables. They raised pigs and goats and sheep. They planted fruit trees and grew grapes. The river also gave the people fish to eat and ducks to hunt. (8)
The variety of food types produced along the Nile floodplains is emphasized, and Edwards stresses the varied diet of ancient Egyptians. As well as providing water and food, the Nile also facilitated the exchange of goods between Egyptian towns and cities. As Edwards observes, “The Nile was the “road” that boats traveled, bringing goods from city to city” (8). Trade via boats enabled the consistent movement of goods in a manner that was far less taxing than overland trade, further supporting the development of a sophisticated empire, for the extensive reach of such trade meant that food types and resources could be enjoyed in geographical locations far from their origin. This fact is illustrated by the archaeological evidence of King Tut’s life of luxury as a young boy, for he enjoyed a diet originating in all corners of the empire that his father ruled.
Furthermore, the Nile supported the construction of permanent structures, unlike the nomadic lifestyles of desert dwellers. The major metropolises of Thebes and Memphis sprang up on the banks of the Nile, and the clay from the river’s edge was used to build houses and infrastructure. Furthermore, heavy stone blocks were transported by barges along the Nile, allowing for the construction of elaborate and costly statues, pyramids, and tombs, such as those in the Valley of the Kings. The success of Egyptian architectural and engineering techniques is highlighted by the fact that many of these structures still stand, thousands of years after their construction.
Lastly, Edwards emphasizes the continuity of the Egyptian civilization, and her descriptions are designed to emphasize the society’s strength and power. For example, King Tut was the “twelfth King of the Eighteenth dynasty” (62) within the New Kingdom period—one of three periods, each of which spanned hundreds of years and numerous dynasties. Tellingly, the great pyramids of Giza were constructed many years before King Tut lived, and Edwards uses this fact as a reminder that King Tut would have studied ancient Egypt as well, the years before his own rule, emphasizing the immense period of this civilization.
Throughout Edwards’s account of ancient Egypt, the author conveys the vital role of archaeology in revealing the details of the ancient past. Most modern-day knowledge of King Tut’s life and death comes from the artifacts in his burial tomb, which Howard Carter discovered in 1922. Such artifacts provide a wealth of evidence that makes it possible to piece together the details of the young pharaoh’s life. For example, Edwards assumes that King Tut was literate, given that writing implements were included in the tomb. Throughout the book Edward’s language posits suggestions about King Tut’s life and death rather than speaking in absolutes, and this approach implies that archaeology involves a great deal of guesswork.
Similarly, archaeologists and historians posit that King Tut enjoyed playing senet (a popular board game), for multiple sets of this game were found in his tomb. Likewise, the presence of two chariots in the tomb suggests that the young pharaoh enjoyed this sport as well. His varied diet and comfortable furnishings indicate that he lived a life of luxury and enjoyed many amenities, such as a meat-based diet and a comfortable linen mattress and bed. Furthermore, the statues of servants around King Tut tell archaeologists of the constant care and attention that he must have enjoyed in life, for he clearly expected this high quality of life and care to continue into his afterlife. These artifacts therefore indicate the centrality of Egyptian Beliefs about the Afterlife, which inspired the construction of immense structures that were filled with everything a person could want and need in their eternal journey after life.
While many of Edwards’s descriptions remain objective and detached, she also includes several imaginary interludes that dramatize key moments of Egyptian history and the subsequent discovery of King Tut’s tomb. For example, Edwards stresses the agonizing nature of the steps leading up to Carter’s discovery and entry into the tomb. Because Carter was compelled to wait for the arrival of Lord Carnarvon, the man who funded his dig, Edwards evokes a sense of tension and suspense as Carter waits two weeks before he can finally open the door of the tomb that he has been digging for years to find. These dramatized accounts create a detailed understanding of Carter’s own emotional experience as he beheld the magical and otherworldly sight of a tomb that had not been viewed by human eyes for thousands of years. As the narrative states in Carter’s voice:
At first I could see nothing . . . but presently, as my eyes grew accustomed to the light, details of the room within emerged slowly from the mist, strange animals, statues and gold—everywhere the glint of gold. . . . I was struck dumb with amazement. (55)
Unlike the voyeuristic souvenir hunting of tomb robbers over the centuries, the field of archaeology is characterized as an ethically sound and worthwhile practice, and Edwards champions its gentle and respectful approach to preserving ancient artifacts and learning about the ancient world.
Tombs took many forms in ancient Egypt; some were simple buried rooms like King Tut’s, while others were elaborate, costly edifices like the massive Pyramids of Giza. In any case, all such tombs allude to the immense importance that ancient Egyptian society placed upon preparing for the afterlife, and this intense focus is reflected in ancient Egyptian cultural practices and religious beliefs. Ancient Egyptians with the means to do so equipped themselves with everything they might need in the afterlife, believing that they would be magically reincarnated if they passed certain tests. As a result, the wealthiest members of society, such as the pharaohs, ensured that they would have a full range of amenities to enjoy after death, including furniture, games, hobbies, food, eating utensils, clothing, writing and painting materials, and servants. Such thoroughly stocked tombs confirm that ancient Egyptians believed that “in the Land of the Dead, the person’s spirit would continue to enjoy all the same pleasures as before” (31).
Edwards also stresses the idea that King Tut’s mourners, who would have ceremonially wailed and cried as his body was taken to the Valley of the Kings, became joyful once he was interred, secure in the belief that he “would live and be happy forever” (43). However, given that King Tut’s tomb is considered to be relatively modest, the untimely nature of his death may have contributed to the fact that he was interred in a small, unassuming tomb that may have originally been intended for a nobleman. Because even this small example of a tomb was filled with great wealth and luxury, archaeologists can infer the absolute decadence of grander tombs. According to Carter, Tutankhamun’s tomb was filled with luxurious and precious items, and even after an ancient ransacking, Carter could see “statues and gold—everywhere the glint of gold” (55).
As a byproduct of ancient Egyptian beliefs in the afterlife, items of luxury and privilege, as well as everyday items, were intentionally preserved and interred in tombs. However, centuries of tomb robbing have resulted in the loss of most of these artifacts. For this reason, the relatively undisturbed tomb of King Tut—himself a minor pharaoh—provides invaluable evidence about the culture, history, wealth, and religious beliefs of this long-lost ancient society.