50 pages • 1 hour read
Julie BuxbaumA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Kit is one of the narrators and protagonists of What to Say Next. At the beginning of the novel, Kit feels lost in grief after her father died in a car accident. She compares the emotional distance that she feels from her peers to wearing an “astronaut helmet” that prevents her from fully engaging with school, her friends, or her mother, Mandip. She initially pursues a friendship with David because his social isolation leads her to understand that he will allow her space to be quiet when she needs it.
Kit struggles to sleep as a symptom of her grief, which is exacerbated by the revelation, late in the book, that she was driving the night her father died. Though Kit was not at fault for the accident, she still deals with guilt, both that she survived when her father didn’t and because she worries over how she might have prevented the accident. When David shows that there is no version of the accident where Kit could have responded and saved her father, Kit does not feel that this resolves her grief, though she does feel some level of reassurance from the knowledge.
Kit spends much of the novel feeling torn between what she terms the “old Kit” and the “new Kit.” Her emotional distress is deepened when she learns that her parents were contemplating getting divorced because her mother had an affair with Robert’s best friend, Jack. She struggles between the desire to make peace with the parent she still has alive and her anger at her mother. Kit feels overwhelmed by the adult burdens that have been placed on her in her youth.
At the end of the novel, Kit decides to push herself to move forward in a manner that lets her embrace both the qualities of the “old Kit” and the “new Kit.” Though she recognizes that this path is not necessarily easy or logical in its quest to seek meaning out of the accident, she recognizes that doing so will help her repair her relationship with her mother and find grater peace in her grief. At the end of the novel, Kit also forgives David for his unthinking reaction when he realized that she was driving the night of the accident, though she is not yet ready to resume a romantic relationship with him.
David is one of the narrators and protagonists of What to Say Next. At the beginning of the novel, David identifies as broadly non-neurotypical. Over the course of the novel, however, he comes to more closely identify with an Asperger’s syndrome diagnosis, which he received as a child. He elects to keep this diagnosis as a means of self-definition even though he initially pushes back against such a label.
David’s feelings about his neurodiversity are complex. While he expresses happiness with certain ways that he thinks (even when they are different from neurotypical patterns), he experiences significant shame and anxiety about the ways that he feels not “normal.” When his journal is published, for example, he thinks that Kit will find him “disgusting” when she sees how he logs and categorizes interpersonal interactions. He resists letting others see his hand flapping, a form of stimming (or repeated, soothing motion that people with autism may perform, though the specific movements or actions will vary from person to person). He reflects that he ceased flapping after his sister recorded a video of him doing it and warned him that continuing to flap would stop him from ever having friends. This incident, as well as other interactions with his sister, indicates how even people in David’s life who seek to help him often stigmatize qualities that signal David’s neurodiversity to others and expect him to strive to act normally. When David tells Kit about his past Asperger’s diagnosis, it is therefore a significant emotional step for David. Telling Kit indicates that he understands that letting people in means letting them see all parts of himself, not only the parts that he adopts when trying to act “normal.”
David struggles with ambiguity, which he explains as his preference for “closed loops.” This desire for linearity causes him trouble at various points in the novel. His efforts to logically characterize social interactions, for one, are often thwarted by the complex undercurrents to his peers’ emotions—particularly when facing bullies who take advantage of his differences and feign friendliness to further torment him. This tendency also causes conflict with Kit, as when David is so relieved to have solved the mystery about Robert’s accident that he smiles over the idea that Kit was driving when her father died. Though the novel does not portray David’s social challenges as resolved, Miney does remind David that he has improved at understanding others’ feelings; though he did not immediately think of Kit’s feelings when he discovered her role in the accident, he quickly realized his faux pas, where he previously wouldn’t have realized the error at all. The end of the novel implies that David is growing more comfortable with ambiguity.
David is one of the narrators and protagonists of What to Say Next. At the beginning of the novel, David identifies as broadly non-neurotypical. Over the course of the novel, however, he comes to more closely identify with an Asperger’s syndrome diagnosis, which he received as a child. He elects to keep this diagnosis as a means of self-definition even though he initially pushes back against such a label.
David’s feelings about his neurodiversity are complex. While he expresses happiness with certain ways that he thinks (even when they are different from neurotypical patterns), he experiences significant shame and anxiety about the ways that he feels not “normal.” When his journal is published, for example, he thinks that Kit will find him “disgusting” when she sees how he logs and categorizes interpersonal interactions. He resists letting others see his hand flapping, a form of stimming (or repeated, soothing motion that people with autism may perform, though the specific movements or actions will vary from person to person). He reflects that he ceased flapping after his sister recorded a video of him doing it and warned him that continuing to flap would stop him from ever having friends. This incident, as well as other interactions with his sister, indicates how even people in David’s life who seek to help him often stigmatize qualities that signal David’s neurodiversity to others and expect him to strive to act normally. When David tells Kit about his past Asperger’s diagnosis, it is therefore a significant emotional step for David. Telling Kit indicates that he understands that letting people in means letting them see all parts of himself, not only the parts that he adopts when trying to act “normal.”
David struggles with ambiguity, which he explains as his preference for “closed loops.” This desire for linearity causes him trouble at various points in the novel. His efforts to logically characterize social interactions, for one, are often thwarted by the complex undercurrents to his peers’ emotions—particularly when facing bullies who take advantage of his differences and feign friendliness to further torment him. This tendency also causes conflict with Kit, as when David is so relieved to have solved the mystery about Robert’s accident that he smiles over the idea that Kit was driving when her father died. Though the novel does not portray David’s social challenges as resolved, Miney does remind David that he has improved at understanding others’ feelings; though he did not immediately think of Kit’s feelings when he discovered her role in the accident, he quickly realized his faux pas, where he previously wouldn’t have realized the error at all. The end of the novel implies that David is growing more comfortable with ambiguity.
Lauren, or “Miney,” as she is known by her brother David, is one of David’s strongest emotional supports in the novel., as well as being his social opposite. At the start of the novel, Miney is away at college, though she returns for an extended period during the middle of the text after she finds herself struggling socially and academically at college. Kit recalls Miney as being effortlessly cool and very popular; Kit credits her influence as the reason David has not faced more bullying for his neurodiversity, as Miney is extremely protective over her little brother. This attitude is confirmed when Miney threatens to “ruin” Kit if she hurts David’s feelings.
David idolizes Miney. This impression of his sister as entirely unflappable leads him to struggle to understand that her return from college is due to emotional distress, rather than a physical ailment. He relies on his sister for advice, which the novel indicates is well-intentioned if something not ideal or unkind. Miney, for example, once told David that his “flapping” hand motions would prevent him from having friends. Though she did this to help her younger brother socially, these comments contributed to some of David’s internalized shame about being neurodivergent.
David grows somewhat aware of the challenges his sister faces as the novel progresses. Though Miney must inform him outright of her struggles to adapt to college life, David gathers for himself that it must also be difficult for Miney to be negatively compared to David by their father, who considers Miney’s interests frivolous. Though David comments that Miney stands up to her father’s sexist attitudes about makeup and other feminized interests, the text implies that she is nonetheless affected by her father’s disdain. By the end of the novel, Miney and David’s relationship becomes less one-sided. Miney opens up to David about her struggles and indicates that she has learned from his bravery about facing his bullies. David, meanwhile, recognizes that he is more capable than he initially thought when it comes to navigating high school social interactions without his sister’s input.
Mandip is Kit’s mother. Kit and Mandip have a challenging relationship. Though Kit wants to embrace her mother and discuss their shared grief over Robert’s death, Mandip pushes away any reference to deeper feelings for much of the novel, instead managing her grief by throwing herself into work. Kit is both understanding and somewhat in awe of her mother’s professional skill and what Kit sees as Mandip’s unflagging ability to be put together and unruffled. Kit uses Mandip’s experience as the American-born daughter of Indian immigrants to understand her own relationship to being half Indian in overwhelmingly white Mapleview. Though Kit makes references to her experiences with racist attitudes and microaggressions, she frequently diminishes those experiences by comparing them to her mother’s struggles.
The relationship between Kit and Mandip fractures when Mandip reveals that she had an affair with Robert’s best friend, Jack. Mandip immediately regretted her infidelity, expressing regret that her husband died while in doubt of his wife’s love. Kit finds the idea that even adults do stupid things to be uncomfortable; she recognizes that she had hoped her own feelings of instability and uncertainty would dissipate as she got older.
By the end of the novel, Kit and Mandip are tentatively reconciled. They do not dismiss the past hurts between them but seek to find a more honest and open relationship as they move forward and work through their grief together.