logo

53 pages 1 hour read

Jonathan Safran Foer

We Are the Weather

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2019

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 3Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 3: “Only Home”

Part 3, Chapter 1 Summary: “Mapping Our Vision”

At the end of the 19th century, a scientist named Percival Lowell, a fellow at the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, led the effort in the discovery of Pluto. At the time, the planet Mars couldn’t be observed by scientists, and Lowell had a theory that Mars once had water but began to warm, and this warming destroyed the planet and all the life on it. Lowell’s theory was that Martians dug vast canals to escape the heat. These canals, he surmised, connected “the poles of the planet to the expanse of scorched land that covered the rest of its surface” (106). Other scientists didn’t believe him. In 1965, a NASA Mariner Spacecraft flew by and disproved the existence of Lowell’s canal theory. Foer visits his grandmother. He returns to his childhood home and realizes that nothing looks the same. Nothing is as big or small emotionally or physically.

Foer then shifts to a story about the Roman Empire. After its fall, plants found nowhere else in Europe began to grow. These plants arrived there as seeds on the pelts of the bulls, bears, giraffes, and tigers the Romans imported from thousands of miles away for the gladiators to slaughter. Foer then explains that the reason Lowell believed he saw the canals was because he adjusted his telescope to accommodate his cataracts. What he actually saw were floaters in his eyes. Foer says what we think, see, or believe may not be true. There is a common sentiment that climate change was created by cumbersome outside forces, like big business and AC machine manufacturers; this sentiment allows individuals to believe there is nothing that can be done to stop the crisis. In reality, he says, we as individuals can and must learn to take responsibility. That was what his grandmother did: She was the only one in her family who made it out of the Holocaust because she took personal responsibility. She tells Foer that his being alive is her revenge against the Nazis. Foer writes: “The planet will get revenge on us, or we will be the planet’s revenge” (110).

Part 3, Chapter 2 Summary: “Home Is Almost Always Imperceptible”

In keeping with the idea that seeing is not always believing, Foer talks about the smell of his home. He can’t smell his own home, just like some people who live near a construction site don’t hear the noise. Sensory adaptation applies to all senses: hearing, seeing, smelling, etc. Foer says home is the place we all feel safest but also the one we can least accurately perceive. 

Part 3, Chapter 3 Summary: “Glimpses of Home”

The only way to see the entire Earth is by traveling 20,000 miles into space. “The Blue Marble” is the iconic picture of the Earth as seen from space. Taken by astronaut William Anders, it has become the most common image of the Earth. Astronauts have felt profound awe and beauty when seeing the Earth from space, and many of them made dramatic personal changes when they returned home. One became a preacher; one became a devotee of transcendental meditation; another founded an organization that researches human consciousness. To view the Earth from that distance, Foer argues, is to be powerfully moved. This emotional response is called the “overview effect.” Astronaut Ron Garan talks about his contradictory emotions about the Earth when he first saw it. He was first flooded with emotion and awareness, but his second thought was to feel sad when he realized how the planet has spent its life protecting humans from space, and yet it is such a “stunning, fragile oasis” (115).

Part 3, Chapter 4 Summary: “Glimpses of Ourselves”

Foer begins by discussing an experiment in which a mirror was placed in the forest. Most of the animals did not seem to recognize their image. He returns to this theme several times throughout the chapter.

There was a time in the United States and elsewhere when we took global warming seriously. In Canada, the Montreal Protocol effectively rid the country of chlorofluorocarbons, which healed the ozone layer. In the era of Reagan and Bush, both presidents spoke about climate change. Both political parties voted on a resolution to impel President Reagan to establish an international treaty modeled on the Montreal Protocol. But after investing in climate change for over a decade, things changed. Shell Oil slashed its budget dedicated to learning ways to reduce emissions that damage the planet. The auto industry also went back on its pledge to investigate ways to stop climate change. President George W. Bush retracted his promise to regulate emissions from coal. Obama failed to push climate change forward. Donald Trump actively increased the emissions that pollute the climate. Foer ends this chapter by saying that even if you recognize yourself in the mirror, it doesn’t mean you reflect on yourself and your actions.

Part 3, Chapter 5 Summary: “Mortgaging the Home”

Stephen Hawking once said that humans will need to leave the Earth to survive: “The Earth is becoming too small for us” (123). Foer compares the relatively small output of emissions and waste of the Bangladeshis to that of Americans. If everyone lived like Americans or continued to reproduce like the Chinese, we would need four Earths to sustain us. Since the end of the 1980s, Foer says, the Earth can no longer sustain us. He calls this phenomenon “ecological debt” (124). We are mortgaging our children’s future lifestyles because our own lifestyles will lead to climate change. Foer mentions how his great-grandparents lived in a one-room house without heating or indoor plumbing. It would be difficult for them to comprehend all he has today: a car, a pantry stocked with food, a home with rooms that are not even used on a daily basis. Debts in the form of infrastructure, tax issues, and even many forms of climate change can be fixed, but with respect to greenhouse gas emissions, mortgaging doesn’t make sense: “no one, no institution, no god would give us a loan so wildly out of proportion with our means” (126).

Part 3, Chapter 6 Summary: “A Second Home”

Stephen Hawking said we need to start colonizing space. Elon Musk is already attempting to colonize Mars. Foer says the questions aren’t can we and should we do it, but what do we do in the meantime? Why won’t government tax fossil fuels in proportion to the amount of carbon released or institute an ambitious cap and trade program? The problem, Foer says, is that climate change isn’t just about what we can legislate, it’s about social issues like overpopulation, income disparities, and our consumption habits. The four most effective strategies, according to an organization called Project Drawdown, are reducing food waste, educating girls, providing family planning and reproductive healthcare, and shifting to a plant-rich diet. The point is that change will require collective action. Leaving our home to save our lives, Foer argues, means that people think our home is dispensable. The cycle will never stop. 

Part 3, Chapter 7 Summary: “Glass”

Foer discusses the Hubble Space telescope, which was almost a total waste of money because the mirror that allowed scientists to see was ground too far down, about the size of one-fiftieth of a human hair. It was saved by an optical component that was the opposite of the same degree of miscalculation on the mirror. The Hubble Space craft was essentially saved by a pair of glasses. In this chapter, Foer discusses the choice about the things we look at. Once, in school, he couldn’t see the moon because he wasn’t looking for it. Likewise, collectively, we don’t see or believe that our planet is in danger. If we could somehow see the danger we are in, then we’d know what we were looking at and would try to solve the problem. He talks about the number of people who jumped from the Golden Gate Bridge, almost all of whom died. Of the ones who didn’t die, all of them reported changing their minds the minute they jumped. In other words, hindsight is 20/20. Foer implies we need to look now before it’s too late.

Part 3, Chapter 8 Summary: “First Home”

When Americans collectively turned out their lights during World War II, they weren’t protecting their houses; instead, they were protecting their homes. Foer makes the distinction between houses as buildings and homes as sacred places of family and community. Thus, in solidarity, they were protecting their families, their culture, their safety, and their freedom. Foer quotes Stephen Hawking, who was making a public service announcement for a Swedish nonprofit, as saying that because of obesity, “humanity faces a major challenge and millions of lives are in danger” (138). Foer adds that humans are in danger because they eat too much, but each human life is in danger because we all eat too much meat. He argues that we must reach solidarity by making small collective sacrifices, one of which is to stop eating meat.

Part 3, Chapter 9 Summary: “Final Home”

Foer sits by his grandmother’s deathbed. Foer loves his grandmother. When he looks at her, he feels something like the “overview effect:” Everything in the home feels vulnerable, fragile, and beautiful. He realizes his grandmother needs and deserves protection. He reflects on having children. He realizes that both his sons need him in certain ways, but they benefit most when he doesn’t hold on. He transitions to discussing climate change: “Whether or not we address climate change, we will need to learn to let go” (140). He quotes from an article written by Roy Scranton titled “Learning How to Die in the Anthropocene” that ran in the New York Times. The message of the quote is that we are already a dead society regarding climate change. The good news: If we can only recognize we are dead, then we can finally get down to work to save ourselves.

He understands there is nothing he can do to save his grandmother. Foer then turns dark, claiming that it is too late to save the Amazon, coral reefs, and coastal cities. He acknowledges that if this is the case, it would seem futile to try anything. But Foer has a streak of optimism and claims that we can save things that matter to his grandmother and to us. Foer returns to the mirror that appears frequently in these pages. He says, “We must force ourselves to face the mirror and force ourselves to look” (143).

Part 3 Analysis

Foer writes these nine chapters in a more narrative format than the other parts. In the section, known by the Greeks as Proposito and Partitio, Foer makes his stance on his argument clear. The personal narrative gains its power in combination with the statistics, history, and repetition of themes and ideas from the previous chapters. It is interesting to note that all but two of the chapters in this section contain the word “home” in the title. The home discussed is interchangeable with Foer’s personal home, home life, and the home of our Earth. Yet, as the chapter continues forward, it becomes clear that all aspects of home in this chapter that do not deal directly with the Earth are metaphors for the Earth and the trouble it is in. This is his position: We must protect our home, but that can only come when we learn to actually see reality.

In the first chapter of this section, Foer discusses the planet Mars, which then appears frequently throughout the subsequent chapters. The author spends a great deal of time discussing how Percival Lowell’s misperception of Mars and an optometrist’s realization that Lowell had cataracts and was not seeing the planet correctly. This story introduces Foer’s metaphor about what and how we see and the ways in which it is influenced by our personal perception. Foer also discusses how his own childhood memories wrongly indicate that things seemed bigger than they are now as an adult. Foer is using vision and memory as metaphors for seeing what we want to see and being blind to what we need to see. He demonstrates how easy it is to convince ourselves we are seeing things in a certain way, even if they aren’t real. Vision, as a metaphor, isn’t about seeing, it is about wisdom and knowledge. At the end of the chapter, Foer moves in to make his point: Global climate change is viewed in much the same way as Lowell viewed Mars. People believe the crisis is the result of huge, immoveable outside causes, and that limits our ability to believe we as individuals can make a difference.

In Chapters 2 and 3, Foer discusses home in two ways. The first is the home that we grow up in. Using the powerful tool of repetition to make his argument, Foer says that he can’t really see, smell, or otherwise experience home. It is, as he says, almost imperceptible. This is the same, he argues, with our relationship to the Earth: We can’t perceive it. The iconic photograph, the first of its kind, shows the beauty and glory of the Earth as seen from space. This image has radically transformed the lives of many of the astronauts who have seen the Earth from space, which is known as the “overview effect.” When you can see it all, you can feel the love, fragility, and fear for our Earth. But while we stand on its surface, we really have no idea what it looks like and are unable to comprehend its vulnerability. This is in keeping with Foer’s theme that we can’t perceive and/or don’t believe the truth when we are so close to it.

In keeping with the metaphor of seeing and believing, the third chapter begins with the fact that animals rarely recognize themselves in the mirror. This is part of Foer’s strategy to bring in facts and tales from the natural world and extend them into metaphors. These facts are highly symbolic, and Foer uses them for metaphorical teaching moments. The word “home” takes on several meanings. It is the house where we grew up, it is the forest for the animals, it is the Earth for all. When we look in the mirror, Foer says, even if we know it’s our reflection, it doesn’t mean we are at all reflective. Foer is setting up the idea that we mustn’t hold onto beliefs that aren’t true.

Chapters 5 and 6 are perfectly paired for Foer to discuss the ramifications of our actions and inactions. He uses the metaphor of mortgaging a home to discuss the debt we are creating on Earth by not taking climate change seriously. Thematically, he continues to discuss the mess we are leaving for our children. Foer continues the discussion in Chapter 6, wherein he argues that making a new home on Mars is immoral. The change isn’t about a new place to live but about becoming a new person who believes our Earth is indispensable and then putting that into action. Using the metaphors of vision and reality to build this argument, Foer asks rhetorically: Are we so deluded that we can’t see reality for what it is? Is it morally sufficient to dispense with our home on Earth and find a new one? The problem, he implies, is us, not our Earth.

In Chapter 7, Foer brings back the notion of suicide by revealing that survivors of jumping from the Golden Gate Bridge report that the moment they jumped, they regretted it. Foer uses this device to bring us back to the theme that by not doing anything, we are performing a collective death by suicide. But the suicide theme in this instance also circles back to the previous chapters by subtly reminding his readers that it is too cynical and too easy to dispense with the Earth. Rather than leaving, and regretting the death of our home, we should survive and collectively change our beliefs about climate change to make the changes necessary to save the Earth.

Also, a repeat appearance of seeing and sight occurs. Foer has found many ways to metaphorically discuss our “vision.” For him, there is what we see and there is what impedes our vision. To that end, he discusses the pair of glasses they had to give the Hubble Space Telescope. If the lens is off even by the smallest increment, it is impossible to see. This is the main metaphor of these chapters. His hope is that we open our eyes and see the truth.

Chapter 8 returns to the theme of collective good. Foer continues to remind his readers that had we not turned out our lights as a nation during WWII, we might have lost the war. What we need to fight climate change is to come together. He also returns thematically to some of his statistics in the second section of the book to remind readers that Americans eat too much meat. Collectively, we can stop factory farming and its horrific damage to the Earth by skipping meat, cheese, and eggs for two meals. Factory farming is the main problem, Foer says. He comes back to this argument, the thesis of his book, repeatedly.

In Chapter 9, Foer focuses on death. His grandmother has died. He cites an article on climate change that asserts we are already a dead society. But don’t fear, he seems to say. Being dead, feeling dead, understanding that we are on the brink of death are, almost ironically, the only methods that will wake us up. Here, he is hopeful that our delusion will finally die, and we will begin to take climate change seriously.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text