logo

53 pages 1 hour read

Claire Messud

This Strange Eventful History

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2024

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Displacement, Rootlessness, and Belonging

The novel’s most important and overt theme concerns the fraught politics of colonial (and post-colonial) identity. Wherever they live, the Cassar family members experience the disorienting feelings of displacement and rootlessness, and their search for belonging characterizes both the family and the history of the pieds-noirs as a cultural group. The author pays particular attention to how cultural displacement and rootlessness create identity confusion and result in a never-ending search for belonging and home, making it difficult to hold on to familial and cultural traditions.

The first characters to struggle with identity as a result of having been born French Algerian and having to flee Algeria are Gaston and Lucienne. More than their children, they feel deeply connected to France through values, history, beliefs, and religion but also identify distinctly as French Algerian because they were born and raised in North Africa. Of his parents, the young François observes:

Maman and Papa had always talked about how much they loved Algiers, how much a part of them it was, how he and Denise would love it too, the most beautiful city on earth, its shining white buildings rising in a crescent around the glittering Mediterranean. But when they got there, he’d hardly noticed what it looked like, just that it was very hot (10).

François notes that French Algeria (now Algeria) is “a part” of his parents’ identity and will remain so even after they’re displaced by the Algerian war for independence. In a sense, they see themselves through the framework of both French cultural identity and their role within French colonialism. Gaston later acknowledges colonialism’s problematic nature, but both he and his wife see themselves as having been part of a grand, “civilizing” project meant to extend the boundaries of French geopolitical control. Their daughter, Denise, inherits this mindset and never fully recovers from the collapse of colonialism. Gaston, Lucienne, and Denise identify closely with being both French and French Algerian, and they’re proud of both aspects of their identity. Denise, however, feels the sting of being a pied-noir when she returns to France. She struggles throughout her life with the fact that her identity isn’t legible within a mainstream French framework. François too experiences discrimination because of his status as a French Algerian. His fellow French students are somewhat mystified by him, and he realizes that “Algeria featured barely more clearly in the French consciousness than did Puerto Rico or Guam for the Americans” (73). During the colonial period, the Cassars and other pieds-noirs feel, within their community, a strong sense of identity within their community but outside of French Algeria are often stigmatized.

The search for identity ties closely to the Cassar family’s search for home and belonging. They settle in Argentina, Australia, Canada, the US, and then back in the Mediterranean in Toulon, France, but never truly feel at home anywhere. François feels out of place in the US, within his own family unit, and in Europe. Denise finds friends and French communities while living abroad but feels the most at “home” later in life, in her father’s Toulon apartment in the company of a North African cleaning woman. The setting and the company remind her of her youth in Algeria, and only then does she truly seem to let go of her unhappiness. Even Chloe struggles to find a sense of home and belonging. Her generation grows up steeped in the family’s history as French Algerians in exile, but her connections to both France and Algeria are tenuous. For Chloe, belonging comes from time spent with her grandparents and, like Denise, she ultimately decides that “home” is with her grandparents, both in Toronto and in their house in Toulon.

Another key aspect of rootlessness and displacement that characterizes both the Cassar family’s experiences and those of the pieds-noirs as a cultural group is the struggle to maintain connections to familial and cultural customs in exile. The Cassars manage to preserve the importance of family as a value, and each of them, in one way or another, is deeply devoted to their family members. Gaston and Lucienne place an high value on family and successfully teach their children that value as well. Catholicism is another key Cassar family value, though it’s harder for the younger generations to connect with. Gaston, Lucienne, Denise, and later Chloe find that their faith links them to both French and French Algerian identity, and their religious beliefs help them hold onto crucial pieces of their identities. However, for François, Catholicism has little appeal. He describes his beliefs as “willful godlessness,” and after a few attempts to attend mass while living abroad, he gives up. This demonstrates the difficulty of maintaining ties to a home culture in exile, although Chloe’s interest in religion illustrates that preserving traditions across generations is possible.

The Interplay Between Personal and Historical Narratives

Both European and French colonial history have a profound impact on the Cassar family’s lives. The colonial presence of France in Algeria shapes their belief systems, lives, and career decisions. Then, both World War II and the successful war for Algerian independence scatter the family across the globe and alter their life trajectories. Gaston, François, and Denise each reflect at various points in the novel on the impact that external forces had on their lives and careers, and it’s evident that historical events beyond their control deeply affected them.

Gaston and Lucienne are from a generation of French colonizers who were born in the colonies. Therefore, their beliefs and values are rooted in both French and French colonial culture. Gaston’s diplomatic career was a product of the colonial world in that his role was to safeguard French interests in the Mediterranean region and, when war began to loom, to gather intelligence that could be useful to the Allied powers. He sees himself as the preserver and protector of French values in colonial spaces and as part of France’s broader “civilizing” project in its territories. Colonialism thus profoundly impacts his career and life choices.

World War II further impacts the Cassar family. Gaston and Lucienne are in Salonica (modern-day Thessaloniki) with their children when Paris falls to the advancing Nazi army and fear of an Axis invasion of Greece spreads. Therefore, Lucienne and the children are dispatched back to the safety of Algeria. Gaston must contend with the shame of being on the losing side of a war and is spurned by diplomatic representatives of other countries. The Romanian consul’s wife, in gently telling Gaston that he’s no longer welcome at her party, exclaims tearfully, “We are ashamed, but we are representatives of our government” (36). Although she and her husband still admire and respect Gaston, their government has ties to the Axis powers, so they can’t welcome an Allied country’s representative into their home. Lines of communication are soon cut, and Gaston worries constantly about his wife and children in Algeria while he’s in Greece. Their separation places them all under stress, and the displacement they all feel never entirely leaves them. Because François grew up abroad, he finds French Algeria strange and foreign. Feeling out of place in his home country becomes his first experience of cultural dislocation, and it’s part of what drives him to study abroad in the US. Reflecting on his childhood, he notes, “When François and Denise were small, no idyll to be found, the constant movement and disruptions, the bombardments” (242). He never truly feels at home anywhere, and he traces that sentiment back to the rupture that was World War II.

The Algerian war for independence further impacts the family, particularly Denise and Gaston. Denise was still living in Algeria when war broke out. (François was, by then, abroad.) She, much more than François, felt herself distinctly French Algerian, and the war robbed her of both her homeland and her identity. After the war, she settled initially in France and struggled there with prejudice and stigma. The pieds-noirs were subject to discrimination in France, and it was difficult for her when others treated important aspects of her identity with derision and disrespect. Like her brother, she struggles to feel at home anywhere after the rupture of war displaces her, and that sense of isolation will remain constant for much of her life. Gaston too struggles after being forced out of Algeria by war. Like his daughter, he understands himself through the identitarian framework of French colonialism in Algeria. When French Algeria ceases to be a country, he loses a part of himself that he feels he never truly regains.

Colonialism’s Legacy

As a multigenerational story about one French Algerian family, the novel engages with France’s fraught colonial legacy from the perspective of the colonizers rather than the colonized. Nonetheless, Messud’s incisive, in-depth characterization closely examines both how individual characters change over time and how beliefs, values, and practices change across each successive generation. Ultimately, just as the Cassar family’s story reflects the history of French Algerians, the ideological changes that occur between Gaston’s and Chloe’s generations mirror shifting cultural attitudes toward colonialism itself. This novel might not tell the story of occupied and oppressed indigenous Algerians, but it ultimately does tell the story of how colonialism came to be understood in the context of brutality and exploitation.

Although indebted to colonial history, colonialism isn’t ostensibly the novel’s focus. Rather, the author explores the way that the collapse of colonialism impacted her own family and the pieds-noirs community as a whole. However, even as she examines colonialism’s aftermath, the author’s gaze remains on the French colonizers rather than on the Algerian population, whose country was occupied for more than a century. While this kind of focus might feel anachronistic in a cultural landscape where anti-racism and critiques of colonialism have become dominant ideas within both academic and public discourse, within the context of this novel (a fictionalized account of one pied-noir’s family history), the author’s choices are logical. She has crafted a novel that tells her family’s story, and her family is white and French colonial.

However, even as her focus remains on the colonizers rather than the colonized, she explores shifting attitudes toward the French colonial project. Gaston and Denise embody an older set of ideas. They’re nostalgic for the period of French colonial rule (they wouldn’t have termed it an “occupation”), and Gaston in particular (even though he critiques it) identifies himself as a product of French colonialism. He combines French values with a distinctly French Algerian identity and understands himself through this framework. Denise, even though she’s younger than Gaston, can’t manage to critique the greater project of colonialism. For her, the end of colonialism marked a traumatic rupture that robbed her of her homeland, her identity, and the future she had planned for herself. She’s never able to step back and examine the impact of colonialism on the Algerians with whom she grew up. Both of these characters represent the ideology that conceived of, executed, perpetuated, and then defended colonialism bitterly until its end. They’re emblematic of a Eurocentric worldview that cloaked exploitation and oppression under the guise of a “civilizing” project.

Chloe provides the novel’s more contemporary, anti-colonial voice. During a heated conversation with Gaston and Denise, her opposition to colonialism’s brutality becomes evident, and the author finally engages with colonialism’s systemic violence: “In the name of empire, countless atrocities were committed, and they must not be forgotten” (311). Chloe’s critique of colonialism represents the ideological shift that occurred during the latter half of the 20th century and would be natural for an educated woman of her generation. It’s especially important, however, because it comes from a character who is herself the product of colonialism. Her entire family’s trajectory was shaped and then altered by their status as pieds-noirs, so her opposition to colonialism comes from within. Anti-colonial sentiment means more from Chloe than it would from her husband or even her mother, because in finding fault with France’s colonial project, she also casts blame on her own family. Because Chloe’s character is modeled on the author, her views on colonialism represent the author’s own indictment of a system that both shaped and was shaped by her family.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text