54 pages • 1 hour read
Ami McKayA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Though Eleanor, Adelaide, and Beatrice must confront the demon Malphas and his schemes, more often than not, their biggest foe is not supernatural. Rather, McKay deliberately depicts how greater dangers originate in the era’s systemic misogyny. One such example can be found in the psychiatric ward at Blackwell’s Island and how a woman is diagnosed and admitted as a patient. Historically, women could be admitted on the recommendations of their family members and husbands alone, and they were often sent to these wards without their consent (and with little regard for their mental health). Though knowledge about mental health during the Gilded Age was at best rudimentary when it came to diagnosing men, it became an outlet for patriarchal tyranny in the case of women. As Brody’s experience with his mentor, Dr. Mitchell, demonstrates, even experts tend to diminish women in their diagnoses:
[H]e’d witnessed Mitchell chastising them (often quite severely) for “thinking, day-dreaming and fretting, too readily and too much.” He’d diagnosed every woman who had a stray feeling, craving, desire, wish, interest, worry, affection, inkling, suspicion, knowing, predilection or ability, with nervous exhaustion (128).
Women who showed any amount of ambition, concern, interest, or basic personality traits were dismissed and treated under an umbrella diagnosis that failed to take any of their concerns seriously. Worse, psychiatric institutions were weaponized to rid society of its so-called undesirables, which included anyone who defied traditional gender roles or, as is the case for Sophie Miles, showed an interest in an unacceptable topic like witchcraft. There is thus always an underlying tension that Eleanor, Adelaide, and Beatrice are only one accusation away from joining the likes of Sophie. Treatments in these institutions were also specifically designed to incapacitate women. While male patients were pushed to regain physical autonomy and confidence, women had “no strenuous activity prescribed, no adventure-filled trips to the West—only bed rest and boredom leading to loneliness and desperation” (128). Being admitted to the psychiatric ward, therefore, left women at the mercy of a medical diagnosis that would strip them of their livelihoods, identities, and abilities to be functioning members of society.
Likewise, there is danger in being a single woman in an age that only respects the opinions and powers of men. Though Eleanor and Adelaide are able to secure a storefront for themselves, Eleanor feels persistent anxiety about their homestead as she knows their landlord, Mr. Withrow, holds misogynistic views. When the window is broken by a vandal, he shows this side of himself by complaining: “I don’t know why I even agreed to rent to a pair of petticoats” (236). His usage of the word “petticoat” instead of “women” is an example of synecdoche and highlights his disdain, as it dehumanizes Eleanor and Adelaide and crassly equates them with an undergarment. His disapproval of Eleanor and Adelaide also paves the way for Cecil Newland to take his revenge on Eleanor. Though purchasing the building that houses the tea shop is legal, Mr. Withrow agrees to the sale without any notice to his tenants and is more than happy to see the discomfort it causes them. Regarding the eviction notice, he tells them, “‘It’s your walking papers,’ […] with a smirk” (352). Mr. Withrow never had any respect for either woman, and seeing them homeless is something in which he takes joy. McKay thus paints an accurate historical picture of how women walking off the prescribed path can be a source of anxiety, danger, and maliciousness that equals the conniving schemes of a demon.
One of the main conflicts within McKay’s story lies between practitioners of witchcraft and Townsend’s brand of religious doctrine, which advocates for patriarchal compliance and total devotion to the church. Specifically, Townsend and his followers see witchcraft as a promulgation of the Devil’s influence on humans—women especially—and fundamentally believe it is their duty to exterminate all its instances. Ironically, the depth of his zealous convictions makes Townsend the perfect convoy for demonic interference in the human world. His intolerance for what he deems to be sinful behaviors triggers a bloodthirsty desire for pain and violence; as he once reflects while “choking on his impulses” (253): “Sometimes his intolerance for sin was so great, he became overwhelmed with a longing for stocks and thumbscrews, pressings and hangings” (253). Though Townsend often cloaks his actions with savior-based justifications (such as wanting to “save” Beatrice from Adelaide) or as enacting God’s will, his feelings and reactions to killing and harming women whom he believes to be witches say otherwise.
Townsend simply revels in inflicting pain, as his reference to historical torture methods against witches makes clear. As the narrative progresses, it becomes difficult to determine whether his actions are truly in the name of his convictions or whether he uses his beliefs as an outlet for his violent desires. The notion is especially highlighted in his reaction when he sees Lena’s corpse after her suicide: “Hand lingering on her calf, he was disappointed, then relieved, then deliciously satisfied. There was immense beauty in the demise of evil. Falling to his knees he uttered a prayer of thanksgiving” (90). Given that suicide is equally considered a sin in Christian faiths of the Gilded Age, Townsend’s “delicious satisfaction” at Lena’s suicide should conflict with his faith. Yet his disappointment originates not in the fact that she died but that he was not the one to kill her. His desire to kill thus precedes his commitment to his religion; notably, he only prays for thanksgiving (not her soul) after reveling in her demise.
It is thus Townsend’s taste for violence and death that predisposes him to become a pawn for real demons—unlike the women he persecutes. The only direct interaction between Townsend and Palsham is when Palsham approaches Beatrice in the park. However, it is revealed in Chapter 43 that Palsham has been indirectly influencing Townsend like many other men to do his bidding: “In his long existence he’d brought about the demise of many witches merely by encouraging man’s hate, man’s greed, man’s hubris, man’s intolerance” (403). McKay exposes two further ironies with this passage. First, Townsend’s zealous devotion allows a demon to corrupt him and make him a pawn in his scheme. Second, Townsend’s ignorance of the true relationship between witches and demons—the witches’ historical battles against them, their ability to command them and dispel them—places him at odds with the people who could have helped him in his war against the Devil. Townsend willfully chooses not to open dialogue with women, and in his clinging to false narratives, McKay highlights how he becomes that which he purports to hate the most: a servant of evil.
Despite the fear and awe that accompanies the mere mention of magic in the novel, its power is often limited in scope when used in the human world. This directly subverts the perceived notion of magic’s all-encompassing and frightful power. Whether employed by witches, demons, or the Dearlies, McKay’s brand of magic is primarily one of influence rather than direct impact. In the case of Eleanor’s brand of magic, there are instances in which her spells and charms seem more like circumstantial happenstance than acts of magical power. The ESAUE Square spell is one such example. Though the spell is meant to provide Eleanor and Adelaide with a guide to find Beatrice, the arrival of the young fortune-telling girl at the tea shop conflicts with its efficacy, as it seems to have more to do with coincidence than the spell’s power. After all, it wasn’t the spell that provoked Adelaide’s mother to surface from the water and frighten the girl to run to the tea shop. Rather, the cause is better ascribed to the girl’s traumatic encounter with Townsend and her hatred of him because her spoken wish for his death awakened Adelaide’s mother’s ghost, and her fear of him made her run for safety. Eleanor, however, understands her arrival as a direct consequence of the spell she cast. This casts some doubt on whether some of Eleanor’s spells are not magic at all but instead reinterpreted events to fit a magical narrative. Though there are certainly instances of magic such as the “dumb supper” and Beatrice’s ability to communicate with ghosts, witchcraft seems, at times, conjectural rather than a powerful ability.
Likewise, supernatural creatures are also constrained in their power. As magical creatures, The Dearlies’ presence has spanned many cultures; Delphine’s grimoire describes them as a “race of otherworldly beings whose sole responsibility is to make and deliver dreams […] called by various names—angels, menunim, oneiroi, sandmen, the Dearlies” (221). These different names link the Dearlies to Jewish (menunim), Greek (oneiroi), and Scandinavian (sandmen) mythologies, and Eleanor also understands them to be part “of an ancient order of Fay” (23), linking them to European ideas of fairies. The dreams they fashion often have specific purposes, such as foresight (like the cautionary dream they give Eleanor about Beatrice’s arrival) or emotional support (like the comforting and happy dreams they give Beatrice after her ordeal with the Reverend). Despite being creatures of myth and legend, however, their power is constrained by a dreamer’s receptiveness, easily rendering their dreams useless if the right conditions are not provided. In fact, unless someone is aware of how to encourage their receptiveness to the Dearlies’ dreams, such as “plac[ing] a drop of honey on top of each bedpost [and tying] a sprig of lavender above your head” (230), they may be bypassed altogether, regardless of whether the Dearlies would like to give them dreams or not. McKay thus constructs a type of magical contract between Dearlies and their recipients, one that underlines and foresees a decline in participation if knowledge of the Dearlies and how to attract them is not further reinforced. In this way, magic is portrayed as highly conditional and restrictive instead of the devastating power men like Townsend fear it to be.