logo

56 pages 1 hour read

Jonathan Gottschall

The Storytelling Animal

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2012

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 2-3 Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 2 Summary: “The Riddle of Fiction”

Gottschall narrates a visit to a child daycare, which he metaphorically describes as an “asylum” to highlight the imaginative chaos of children at play. He observes children fully immersed in their fictional roles, from princesses to heroes, demonstrating the early human capacity for make-believe. This scenario serves to underscore how storytelling is not just a learned cultural behavior but an innate and vital part of human development. It is evident even in very young children, who engage in complex pretend play without any formal instruction.

Your Brain on Drugs

This section explores why humans are so drawn to stories, suggesting that the joy humans derive from fiction is not biologically obvious like the pleasures of eating or sex. Gottschall discusses John Kessel’s short story “Invaders,” where aliens equate their need for cocaine to human engagement with fiction. The text likens the human hand to storytelling, describing both as multifunctional tools evolved not for a single purpose but for many. Just as the hand is used for various physical tasks, storytelling might serve multiple evolutionary functions: it could be a display of intelligence and creativity for sexual selection, a method for cognitive development, a low-cost way to gain valuable social and survival knowledge, or a means to strengthen social bonds and community cohesion.

Storytelling could also be seen as a form of play that exercises the mind, similar to how physical play strengthens the body. Despite these potential benefits, the narrative acknowledges that fiction might also be an evolutionary byproduct—something that does not serve a direct biological function but has emerged as a significant and enriching part of human culture. This exploration contends that storytelling, while not necessarily essential for survival, has nonetheless become an indispensable aspect of the human experience.

The Work of Children

In this section, Vivian Paley’s observations highlight how children use pretend play to delve into complex themes such as good versus evil, life and death, and intricate family dynamics. This play is not mere escapism but a method for children to grapple with real-life challenges and fears in a controlled and manageable context. Children’s stories created during play often contain elements of danger and distress, like falling from the sky or getting lost, indicating their capability to explore and process difficult emotions and situations through the safety of make-believe.

Boys and Girls

The chapter discusses the deep-rooted gender dynamics observed in children’s play, noting how traditional gender roles persist despite significant societal changes. Boys typically engage in more chaotic and aggressive play, while girls partake in nurturing and domestic play. Attempts by educators like Paley to encourage gender-neutral play environments generally fail, which suggests that these behaviors are biologically ingrained. Girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) exhibit play preferences typically associated with boys, indicating the complex interplay of biological and environmental influences on play behavior.

And Down Will Come Baby

The chapter concludes by examining the origins of dark themes in children’s play, which often stem from traditional fairy tales and nursery rhymes filled with violence and peril. This aspect of children’s play suggests that storytelling is inherently focused on dramatizing struggle and overcoming hardships. The chapter argues that storytelling helps individuals engage with and process the concept of trouble.

Chapter 3 Summary: “Hell Is Story-Friendly”

The chapter begins with a father and his daughter, Lily, shopping for cereal in a grocery store. The father, engaged in a mundane decision about which cereal to buy, is reminded of the simple joys of parenting as he interacts with his daughter, who enthusiastically participates in the shopping. The father, distracted by the contents of the cereal box, realizes that Lily has disappeared and notes the presence of a suspicious man wearing a red cap.

This story exemplifies how even ordinary settings can transform into scenes filled with tension and danger. Similarly, fairy tales and nursery rhymes often depict safe environments that suddenly become treacherous. The narrative shifts to a hypothetical alternative where the father and daughter have a more lighthearted interaction over the cereal choice and happily return home, showcasing how the same scenario can be told in vastly different ways—one fraught with danger, and the other filled with familial bliss.

Mind the Gap

The two hypothetical scenarios involving a father and his daughter at a grocery store illustrate the central thesis that while people generally desire peace and predictability in their lives, they are drawn to stories that contain conflict, danger, and complexity. Fiction is often seen as a form of escapism, but it tends to immerse its audience in narratives that are far from the idyllic escapades one might expect if the primary objective were to escape reality. Instead, storytelling frequently involves significant challenges, struggles, and even terror.

The chapter argues that if fiction were purely about escapism, stories would consistently feature scenarios where desires are met without conflict. However, most fiction is quite the opposite, populated with significant strife and challenges. Aristotle noted that fiction is pleasurable despite—or perhaps because of—its often-troubling content.

A Mirror of Life?

The chapter discusses Hyperrealist fiction, which aims to portray life in its most mundane and realistic form. The example of a middle-aged man at his office desk, struggling with the tedium of his work, reflects an extreme form of Realism that shows life exactly as it is. Hyperrealist fiction contrasts with traditional storytelling, which tends to remove the mundane to focus on the compelling aspects of life. Hyperrealist fiction, however, includes these mundane details as a deliberate choice to reflect reality as accurately as possible. Such fiction is often perceived as dull and uninteresting.

The chapter mentions George Gissing’s 1891 novel New Grub Street, where a character writes a Hyperrealist novel that is intentionally dull, focusing on the mundane life of a grocer. This novel reflects on the challenges and impacts of Hyperrealism in literature—it can be seen as artistically pure but often isn’t engaging or enjoyable for readers. The chapter argues that while Hyperrealist fiction can be a valuable experiment in showing what fiction is not, it generally fails to capture and retain audience interest because it lacks the essential narrative elements that make stories engaging, such as conflict and dramatic tension.

A Universal Grammar

That fiction inherently revolves around conflict and trouble is a concept now widely accepted and taught across English literature courses and in writing guides like Janet Burroway’s Writing Fiction. This idea posits that in literature, unlike in real life, conflict is essential because it drives the narrative and engages the audience. Across cultures and epochs, fiction involves characters facing significant obstacles as they strive to achieve their desires, encapsulated in the formula: “Story = Character + Predicament + Attempted Extrication” (52).

This universal structure of storytelling might seem limiting. However, like the human face, which varies slightly yet remains fundamentally similar across individuals, stories too can be unique and captivating despite their structural similarities.

Over the past century, some authors have challenged traditional narrative structures, striving for innovation in storytelling. The Modernist Movement, exemplified by works like James Joyce’s Finnegans Wake, attempted to break away from conventional storytelling, which typically follows a clear pattern of complication, crisis, and resolution. Despite the brilliance of such experimental works, they often fail to resonate with broader audiences due to their complex and unconventional narrative techniques, which prioritize artistic rebellion over engaging, coherent storytelling.

This universal narrative structure suggests that storytelling is ingrained in human psychology, possibly as an evolutionary adaptation to shape and be shaped by narrative forms that address universal human predicaments like love, death, and power. These themes dominate storytelling because they reflect the core challenges and experiences of human life.

The Hero Dies in Our Stead

Navy fighter pilots must land heavy, explosive-laden jets on a short, moving runway on an aircraft carrier. This dangerous task requires extensive practice in simulators to avoid real-world catastrophes. Similarly, human social interactions can be complex and high-stakes, requiring a form of practice that literature and stories provide.

Stories function like social simulators, where individuals can engage in emotional experiences and navigate complex social dynamics without real-world risks. This concept is supported by evolutionary thinkers like Brian Boyd and Steven Pinker, who suggest that fiction serves as a practice ground for developing essential social skills. Novelist Keith Oatley describes stories as “the flight simulators of human social life” (58), allowing people to experience and manage social challenges safely.

The use of fiction for this purpose aligns with older justifications for the arts, suggesting that literature offers low-cost, vicarious experiences that help people prepare for real-life interactions. For example, HBO’s sitcom Curb Your Enthusiasm demonstrates the pitfalls of social misunderstandings, serving as a complex example of how fiction mirrors and prepares individuals for social realities. While stories entertain, they also function as a safe rehearsal space for managing life’s social intricacies.

To Simulate Is to Do

The section explains how fiction simulates social interaction, akin to how flight simulators prepare pilots for actual flying. The discovery of mirror neurons supports this argument; these neurons activate not only when we perform an action but also when we observe the same action performed by others. This neural mechanism allows us to experience and understand others’ emotions deeply.

This simulation through fiction is beneficial because it allows us to engage in complex social interactions and emotional experiences without real-world consequences. Stories provoke real physiological responses in us, such as increased heart rate or sweating during intense scenes, demonstrating that our brains process fictional scenarios as if they were real.

Scientists have further explored this concept by examining how individuals respond to fiction on a neuronal level. For instance, brain imaging studies have shown that watching a film or reading a story can activate the same emotional processing areas of the brain as if the events were actually happening to the viewer or reader. This suggests that engaging with fiction can enhance social and empathic skills, a view supported by studies indicating that people who read fiction frequently tend to have better social abilities than those who read mainly nonfiction.

Chapters 2-3 Analysis

This section extends the exploration of The Psychological Function of Narrative by delving into young children’s propensity for narrative construction. Gottschall uses his visit to the child daycare to illustrate the text’s contention that storytelling is an intrinsic, not merely learned, behavior: As Gottschall puts it, “children adore art by nature, not nurture” (23)—that is, children engage in complex narratives that reveal their capacity for fiction and make-believe long before formal education influences their behavior. In “The Work of Children,” Gottschall extends the exploration of children’s play narratives to examine how children use narrative as a tool to work through fears, understand their environment, and experiment with social roles. Their spontaneous creation of stories filled with danger and resolution mirrors the adult attraction to fiction that similarly navigates chaos and order, conflict and resolution.

Continuing on this theme, Gottschall probes deeper into why humans are so drawn to stories, pondering the evolutionary benefits and the sheer joy that fiction brings, which isn’t immediately explainable by biological necessities like eating or mating. He draws an analogy between the multifunctionality of the human hand and storytelling, suggesting that just as the hand serves multiple purposes beyond its basic physical functions, storytelling, too, has a variety of psychological functions. These might include showcasing intelligence and creativity, aiding cognitive and social development, and providing low-cost training for real-life social interactions.

Gottschall builds a more compelling argument in favor of storytelling’s psychological function by entertaining a possible counterargument. He acknowledges that stories might also be an evolutionary byproduct—a compelling but non-essential result of the human brain’s complex development. “Your Brain on Drugs” introduces a metaphorical comparison by discussing John Kessel’s short story “Invaders,” where aliens equate their need for cocaine to human engagement with fiction. This analogy challenges the high-minded rationales individuals construct about their love for narrative, suggesting instead that, like a drug, fiction is primarily a means of escape, a break from the mundanity or harshness of reality. Here, Gottschall tackles the idea that the human attraction to stories might be less about evolutionary adaptation and more about the brain’s idiosyncrasies—humans simply enjoy stories, even if they serve no direct survival function.

This perspective challenges the notion that every human trait must have a clear evolutionary advantage, proposing instead that some aspects of human nature might enhance individual lives without being crucial for survival––a prospect that, ironically, might indicate that such enhancement is important for survival, although Gottschall never explicitly considers this. These ideas tie back to the broader debate in evolutionary biology about the difference between adaptation and byproduct, suggesting that the love for stories might be intertwined with more straightforwardly adaptive traits like sociality and communication. Regardless of whether storytelling is a product or byproduct of evolution, it is shown to have immense ramifications for human psychology.

This section also builds on the theme of The Impact of Stories on Social Cohesion and Identity. In addition to its psychological benefits, storytelling may also foster strong communal bonds through shared narratives.

Gottschall develops The Diversity and Universality of Storytelling Across Cultures by arguing that there is an innate human attraction to narratives that explore the darker, more complex aspects of life. He introduces a universal narrative structure—“Story = Character + Predicament + Attempted Extrication” (52)—and shows how this structure manifests in different cultures. Gottschall’s attention to narrative structure suggests that certain themes are not just compelling; rather, they are intrinsic to humanity’s understanding of what a story is. By framing storytelling in this way, Gottschall connects the diversity and universality of storytelling to its psychological function, showing how human cognition and culture are inextricable.

These early chapters lay a foundational understanding of how storytelling is woven into the fabric of human life, suggesting that the penchant for narrative is as natural and essential as any other form of biological expression. This analysis sets the stage for further exploration into how stories shape brains, behaviors, and the very structure of societies, emphasizing that understanding fiction is key to understanding ourselves.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text