logo

60 pages 2 hours read

David Abram

The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1996

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 2-3Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 2 Summary: “Philosophy on the Way to Ecology: A Technical Introduction to the Inquiry”

Abram introduces phenomenology as a philosophical framework from which to understand the contrast between the experienced worlds of Indigenous cultures and the modern Western world. This framework, particularly based on Edmund Husserl’s work, challenges the modern assumption of a single, objective reality, tracing its roots back to René Descartes’s separation of mind and matter. Husserl’s phenomenology aims to return to “the things themselves” (34), focusing on the world as experienced in its immediate presence rather than as an object of scientific analysis. This approach emphasizes the subjective, lived experience as the foundation upon which all knowledge, including scientific knowledge, is built.

Abram discusses how Husserl’s work confronts the solipsism critique by highlighting the body’s role in mediating between subjective experiences and the intersubjective world shared with other beings. This leads to the recognition of a collective, experienced world that precedes and underlies scientific conceptualization. Husserl identifies this preconceptual world as the “lifeworld,” or the realm of direct, lived experience that is influenced by cultural practices and ways of engaging with the world. Despite the diversity of the lifeworld across cultures, Husserl suggests that shared structures or layers exist and that the earth itself provides a fundamental, grounding experience common to all.

Abram notes Husserl’s radical assertion that, phenomenologically speaking, the earth does not move, challenging the Copernican model from the standpoint of lived experience. This highlights a clash between scientific convictions and sensory perception, revealing a schism in the modern worldview. Husserl’s late work emphasizes the earth as the “secret depth” of the lifeworld, the common ground of all human experience and cognition.

Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s work advances Husserl’s phenomenology by emphasizing the lived experience of the body as central to understanding perception. Rejecting the notion of a disembodied, transcendental ego, Merleau-Ponty identifies the subject of experience as the bodily organism itself. He argues that without the body, there is no experience and no contact with the world, and thus the body is the true subject of experience. This perspective challenges the conventional view of the self as incorporeal, instead highlighting the body’s role in shaping human engagement with the world.

Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology considers the body an active participant in perception, not a passive recipient of sensory inputs. Its interactions with the world are fluid and dynamic, adjusting to the ever-shifting environment. This interaction is not deterministic but open and creative, allowing for genuine contact with the new and the unexpected. Perception, then, is an ongoing dialogue between the body and the world, characterized by mutual influence and reciprocity.

In his work, Merleau-Ponty uses active language to describe the perceptual world as animate and lively, challenging the traditional view of the sensible as passive. He argues that the most immediate human experience of things is active, engaging entities that enter into a communicative relationship with their bodies. This approach underscores the active participation of both the perceiver and the perceived in perception, suggesting that sensory engagement with the world is inherently animistic.

Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology thus offers a rethinking of perception as participatory, wherein the sensing body and the sensible world intertwine in a dynamic interplay. This perspective not only bridges the gap between subject and object but also reaffirms embodied experience as the foundation of understanding and interaction with the world. Perception, in this view, is not merely a cognitive process but a bodily practice that situates individuals within a more-than-human world of relations and exchanges.

To illustrate the participatory nature of perception, Abram cites the craft of sleight-of-hand magicians, who rely on active engagement between the body and the world to create magic. The magician’s tricks, such as making a coin vanish and reappear, rely on spectators’ senses to fill in gaps with impossible events. This engagement showcases that imagination is not a separate mental faculty but an inherent aspect of the senses, extending beyond the immediately perceivable to interact with the unseen aspects of the sensible.

Merleau-Ponty’s work highlights the reciprocal and interdependent relationship between the perceiver and the perceived. This idea aligns closely with Indigenous worldviews, which consider the environment sensate and responsive, necessitating respectful and mindful interaction. This recognition of perceptual reciprocity could inspire an environmental ethic that emphasizes empathy with the living land.

The blending of the senses, or synesthesia, is a fundamental aspect of perception, highlighting the interconnectivity of sensory experiences. This challenges the conventional separation of senses and suggests a deeper, embodied engagement with the world. Such engagement reveals the animate nature of all perceived things and is intended to foster connection with the environment. Merleau-Ponty’s later work emphasizes the common matrix underlying both the sentient and the sensible, suggesting continuity between the human body and the world. This perspective reveals language as a mediator of human-world relationships, capable of either enhancing sensory engagement with the environment or deadening it, depending on the cultural context.

In Indigenous cultures, language affirms and enriches the sensorial experience, speaking to and with the more-than-human world, fostering a sense of kinship and reciprocity. In contrast, Western language often distances from direct sensory engagement, privileging abstract thought over embodied experience. Abram argues that understanding this divergence in the role of language is crucial to rekindling a participatory, respectful relationship with the natural world.

Chapter 3 Summary: “The Flesh of Language”

Abram explores the enigmatic and reciprocal nature of language as rooted in the sensuous, bodily experience of interaction with the animate world. Language, according to Abram, unfolds as a reciprocal exchange between living bodies and the world, suggesting that perception itself is the foundation of linguistic exchange. He challenges the conventional view of language as a set of arbitrary signs, instead proposing that language emerges from the gestural, expressive interaction with the environment. This view aligns language with the dynamic, interconnected web of life, suggesting that linguistic meaning is not detached from the sensory world but is a direct outgrowth of embodied engagement with it.

Abram draws on Merleau-Ponty’s insights to argue that the expressiveness of language is grounded in the body’s sensory experiences. The sounds and gestures that comprise speech are not arbitrary but are rooted in the affective tonality of one’s interactions with the world. This perspective positions language as a living phenomenon that evolves within the sensory life of the body and is intricately tied to the more-than-human world.

The text further delves into the ecological dimensions of language, suggesting that the complexity of human language reflects the complexity of the ecological web. As technological civilization impacts biodiversity, it impoverishes language, severing the ties that connect human speech to the natural world’s myriad voices. Thus, the vitality of language links directly to the vitality of the earth’s ecosystems, and the diminishment of one leads to the impoverishment of the other.

Language, for Abram, is not merely a human construct but a manifestation of the animate earth speaking through people, reflecting humans’ embeddedness in the web of life. This perspective aligns closely with Indigenous understandings, in which language is an extension of the earth’s vitality, often considered a gift from or shared with nonhuman beings, emphasizing universal animacy and the power of speech to influence reality. Abram highlights that genuine speech acts, which creatively engage with the world, affirm that human languages are not just human constructs but expressions of the animate earth itself. This view challenges the conventional separation of humans from the rest of nature, suggesting instead that linguistic capabilities reflect and depend on the broader ecological web. The complexity and expressiveness of human language are thus seen as continuous with the myriad voices of the natural world, rather than as evidence of human exceptionalism.

This discussion raises questions about the modern disconnection from participatory perception and the animate dialogue that characterizes Indigenous cultures’ engagement with the world. This disengagement impoverishes not only human language but also the sensory experience of the world, leading to a perception of nature as inert and silent. Abram suggests that this severance may be influenced by language’s power to shape perception, yet this alone does not fully explain the cultural shift toward viewing language as an exclusively human domain and the natural world as devoid of agency or voice.

Confronting these challenges, Abram calls into question the events or processes that have led to the “double withdrawal” of nature from human senses and languages, proposing that answering this query is crucial to understanding the contemporary human condition and relationship with the more-than-human world. Abram frames this exploration as setting the stage for further inquiry into how the entwined nature of perception and language can be reconciled with the experience of a disenchanted, silent nature, pointing toward the need for reengagement with the participatory, animate earth.

Chapters 2-3 Analysis

Abram delves deeper into the philosophical underpinnings of his inquiry, drawing extensively on phenomenology to contrast the experiential worlds of Indigenous cultures with that of the modern Western world. Through the lens of Edmund Husserl’s and Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenological philosophies, Abram seeks to challenge prevailing modern assumptions about the nature of reality, perception, and the role of language in mediating human relationships with the environment, which introduces The Role of Language and Perception in Environmental Consciousness as a theme. These chapters underscore the intricacies of perception, the embodied nature of human cognition, and the sensuous underpinnings of language, particularly as they relate to the ecological and linguistic dimensions of human experience.

Abram’s discussion centers on Husserl’s critique of the Cartesian dualism of mind and matter, advocating a return to the immediacy of lived experience as the foundation for all knowledge. This phenomenological stance highlights the subjective, intersubjective, and embodied aspects of human cognition, suggesting a preconceptual “lifeworld” that is shared across cultures yet is distinctly shaped by specific ecological and cultural contexts. Husserl’s radical assertion that, from a phenomenological perspective, the earth does not move, presents a metaphorical challenge to the disenchanted worldview promulgated by scientific objectivism, reasserting the primacy of sensory experience as the foundation of human understanding.

Merleau-Ponty’s advancements in phenomenology further emphasize the centrality of the lived body in perception. Rejecting the notion of a disembodied consciousness, Merleau-Ponty posits the body as the true subject of experience, thereby challenging conventional understandings of the self and the world. His concept of a reciprocal and interdependent matrix underlying both the perceiver and the perceived offers a radical reimagining of perception as a participatory, dynamic interplay between the sensing body and the sensible world. This perspective, Abram argues, resonates with Indigenous worldviews that recognize the environment as sensate and responsive, necessitating a respectful and mindful interaction.

Abram’s exploration of language as a sensuous, bodily practice rooted in the animate world further bridges the gap between phenomenological theory and ecological consciousness. Contrasting the expressive, reciprocal nature of language in Indigenous cultures with the abstract, disembodied language of Western modernity, Abram argues for a reconceptualization of linguistic meaning as emerging from embodied engagement with the more-than-human world. This view challenges the conventional separation of humans from nature, instead suggesting that human language is an expression of the earth’s vitality, reflecting an innate ecological interconnectedness.

However, Abram’s analysis also implicitly critiques the modern disconnection from participatory perception and from the animate dialogue that characterizes Indigenous engagements with the world. This disengagement, manifested in the reduction of language to arbitrary signs and the perception of nature as inert, highlights a broader cultural shift toward alienation from the sensuous, embodied experience of the world. Abram suggests that this “double withdrawal” of nature from human senses and languages is symptomatic of a deeper crisis in the contemporary human condition, calling for reengagement with the participatory, animate earth as a means of re-enchanting human experience and fostering a more sustainable and reciprocal relationship with the natural world.

The Spell of the Sensuous continues to navigate a delicate balance between offering critiques of modernity’s shortcomings and idealizing alternative modes of being that privilege sensory and perceptual immediacy. While Abram’s phenomenological and ecological convictions provide a framework for rethinking humans’ relationship to the natural world, a critical engagement with Abram’s work necessitates recognizing that his emphasis on phenomenological immediacy and the valorization of Indigenous ecological relationships might oversimplify the diverse realities of human interactions with the environment and overlook the multifaceted causes of environmental and cultural disconnection in modern societies. In addition, this perspective risks inadvertently homogenizing Indigenous cultures, failing to fully account for their complexity, their differences, and the contemporary challenges they face. Simultaneously, however, Abram’s integration of Indigenous ecological knowledge not only broadens the scope of environmental discourse but also respects and elevates these often marginalized perspectives, advocating a more inclusive and holistic approach to understanding and addressing ecological crises.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text