logo

54 pages 1 hour read

Kalidasa

The Recognition of Sakuntala

Fiction | Play | Adult | Published in 400

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Background

Literary Context: Classical Sanskrit Drama

Performance in the Indian cultural tradition began as early as 1500 BCE, with the Rigveda, the oldest extant book of Hinduism, containing several hymns and dialogues meant to be chanted and performed. These elements began to crystallize into plays, possibly in the first few centuries before the common era. One of the earliest extant plays in Sanskrit is The Clay Cart, written by Sudraka in the second century CE.

The first few centuries CE marked the apex of classical Sanskrit drama, during which playwrights such as Bhasa and Kalidasa wrote the best-known plays of Sanskrit theater. An important work, The Natyashastra or the Drama Manual, attributed to Bharat Muni, was also composed during this period, containing a comprehensive set of rules for composing and performing plays. The Natyashastra has been considered seminal to the development of Sanskrit drama; however, recent critics believe the conventions prescribed in the manual were by no means as rigidly practiced as earlier thought. Therefore, classical Sanskrit drama should be studied keeping both The Natyashastra and the actual, individual texts in mind.

One of the most important features of classical Sanskrit drama was the absence of tragedy in the western sense. Only two works of Sanskrit tragedy have been discovered so far, both written by Ashwaghosha in the first or second century CE. After Ashwaghosha, tragedy becomes almost absent from the Sanskrit tradition. However, this observation uses Greco-Roman-centered definitions of tragedy. In the Sanskrit theatre, the tragic element or mood was very much present, but incorporated into the middle of the play. In The Recognition of Sakuntala, for instance, Sakuntala and Dusyanta’s long separation constitutes a tragic middle, filled with the emotions of longing and grief.

Another important element of Sanskrit drama is that it contained a polyphony of voices and oratorial styles. Though called “Sanskrit drama,” the plays often include many stretches of dialogue in different Prakrits (dialects of Sanskrit). While upper-class male characters such as Dusyanta would speak in Sanskrit, upper-class women like Sakuntala and Priyamvada would speak a (so-called) refined version of Prakrit. Lower-class characters, like the fisherman, would speak a variant of Prakrit considered cruder. It is also important to note that much of the dialogue would be in the form of song. Music, song, and dance are very important elements of Sanskrit plays. In fact, the “natya” in The Natyashastra refers both to nataka (play), and nritya (dance).

The classical Sanskrit play typically derives its plot from a legend or story from the epic and folk traditions of India. The Recognition of Sakuntala is based on a story from the great epic The Mahabharata. While the settings are described in detail, the use of props is minimal, with actors often using mime instead of props to denote action. The mudra or gesture is extremely important in acting: Plays often contained detailed stage directions for the performers, since specific gestures needed to be enacted with the dialogue for the audience to get its full import.

The Natyashastra also details the crucial theory of the nine rasas or moods, which should inform a narrative. The rasas ranged from hasya (comedy) to sringara (love, beauty, and eroticism) to bibhatsa (the grotesque and the terrifying). These moods were evoked by specific speeches, gestures, costumes, actions, settings, the choice of occupation for characters, and more. The Recognition of Sakuntala is predominated by the sringara mood, as well as the vir rasa, the heroic mood.

Literary Context: The Mahabharata and Kalidasa’s Sakuntala

The source of the plot of The Recognition of Sakuntala is the great epic Mahabharata, composed between 400 BCE and 400 CE. Differences between the two versions are important in understanding Kalidasa’s aesthetic choices and the changing sociocultural norms of ancient and late-ancient India.

The most significant manner in which Kalidasa deviates from the original is by including the plot device of the signet ring and Durvasas’s curse. The signet ring plot point was probably borrowed from a Buddhist tale. While in the original, Dusyanta does not ever forget Sakuntala and questions her to legitimize their bond before the public, in Kalidasa’s version, Dusyanta’s forgetting of Sakuntala is real and inadvertent. The original story is meant to reflect the ideals of kingship: A king’s actions must be lawful and above reproach, hence Dusyanta “proving” to his people his marriage with Sakuntala is real. Kalidasa’s play, by contrast, is above all a love story. Thus, Dusyanta would not willingly test Sakuntala—his repudiation has to be the result of a catastrophic occurrence.

The other significant divergence between the two stories is in their depiction of Sakuntala. Literary critics and historians have often noted that the Sakuntala of the original version is outspoken and fiery, and given far longer speeches than in Kalidasa’s play. Sakuntala in the Mahabharata harshly chides Dusyanta in his court and even warns him that whether he accepts their son or not, the child will become a great emperor. In Kalidasa’s play, Sakuntala is quieter and presented more as a feminine archetype. She does argue with Dusyanta in his capital, but her words in Kalidasa’s version are more restrained and economical. Historians suggest this indicates the changing position of women in society, where models of womanhood were becoming increasingly submissive and conservative. Kalidasa’s Dusyanta is also more of a romantic hero than in the original and displays remorse for his actions, unlike the original character.

Authorial Context: The Life and Works of Kalidasa

Kalidasa, widely regarded as the greatest playwright of classical Sanskrit drama, probably lived between the last decades of the fourth century and the early part of the fifth century. Very little is known of his life, but from the language and settings of his play, it is clear he lived in northern India and enjoyed the patronage of the Gupta kings. His plays were likely performed for the court. He was probably a Brahmin, a member of the priestly class, and was known as much for his skill at poetic verse as for drama. From his name and the many references in his plays, it is clear Kalidasa was a worshipper of the Goddess Kali and the God Siva.

Six of Kalidasa’s works have survived: three plays including The Recognition of Sakuntala and Malavika and Agnimitra, as well as three long poems, including the famous The Cloud Messenger. Sanskrit scholar W. J. Johnson notes that the maturity of Kalidasa’s work indicates he was continuing a literary tradition that had likely been in vogue for nearly 1,000 years. However, the only work of Sanskrit drama known to have survived from earlier centuries (so far) is that of Ashwaghosha (second century CE). Kalidasa’s poetic language is rich and complex, filled with unusual metaphors and comparisons.

Kalidasa’s work was widely disseminated, partly because it peaked during the golden age of the Gupta empire, a period of great sociocultural and literary flowering in north India. These golden-age elements are echoed in The Recognition of Sakuntala, where Dusyanta takes his role as a king and benefactor of the people very seriously, forgives crimes easily, and considers the very idea of taxing ascetics laughable.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text