logo

50 pages 1 hour read

John Grisham

The Racketeer

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2012

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Character Analysis

Malcolm Bannister/Max Reed Baldwin/Reed Baldwin

Malcolm is the racketeer in the story, but his own con game is only one scheme in a web of deceptions and criminal machinations that fall under the definition of racketeering. He was first falsely accused and convicted of being involved in racketeering (fraudulent real-estate deals and money laundering). Nearing 40, Malcolm is a well-educated lawyer with a strong sense of justice that has been violated by egregious corruption in the justice system. He refers infrequently to himself as Black, indicating that although it is a trait he is aware of, he doesn’t give it as much weight as other aspects of his identity. At Frostburg, he feels less in common with the Black prisoners than with the white prisoners who are there for nonviolent financial crimes like himself. In this aspect of Grisham’s characterization, the inherent biases of the judicial system are revealed.

Normally, the reader and the protagonist are on the same side, trying to solve a problem together. Instead, the structure of The Racketeer forces the reader to play detective as Malcolm gradually unfolds the nuances of The Long Con. One question that he holds in abeyance is the balance between justice and vengeance in his plan. As time goes by, it becomes clear that Malcolm is ruthless enough to let the crooked judge be murdered. He is loyal to his friends, but having been betrayed by the justice system, he feels no loyalty to it.

Like all the best con artists, he exhibits indifference to his marks’ feelings and displays a Machiavellian approach to his schemes. He also demonstrates ruthlessness toward the people he sees as his enemies. For example, Malcolm’s animus toward the system is forcefully illustrated by his willingness to let Nathan kill the crooked judge. Malcolm might argue that he didn’t contribute to Nathan’s actions, but neither did he try to stop him. Malcolm might not feel remorse for the judge—who was after all a criminal—but neither does he show distress regarding the demise of the judge’s mistress. Ultimately, Malcolm is an unreliable narrator who injects a great deal of ambiguity into the storyline. Arguably, this makes him an antihero as well: an example of the human need to create monsters to fight monsters.

Quinn Rucker

Malcolm describes Quinn as one of his only Black friends at Frostburg and later as the best friend he ever had. Quinn was in Frostburg on drug charges. He comes from a family of drug dealers; he grew up in the trade, and most of his family is involved—all except Vanessa. Quinn is repeatedly described by the FBI as smart, but the interrogation scene and his confession seem to contradict that. The only clue to great intelligence on his part is the recognition in the middle of the interrogation that Malcolm is the one who revealed his supposed plot to murder the judge. When the full plot is revealed, however, it becomes evident that Quinn did use great intelligence to walk the line with the interrogators and lure them into the scheme without giving away his ulterior motives.

Vanessa Young

Malcolm describes Quinn’s sister Vanessa only as beautiful. He is enamored of her at first sight. Vanessa has kept herself at a distance from her family’s criminal endeavors, which also keeps her out of the FBI’s line of sight when they arrest Quinn. However, Vanessa retains a streak of her family’s taste for larceny that allows her to think quickly and enter wholeheartedly into aiding Malcolm’s confidence scheme. She acts as a shill, playing multiple roles as the scheme unfolds, and she demonstrates herself to be skilled at manipulating people like Nathan Cooley.

In keeping with Malcolm’s role as an unreliable narrator, he withholds his full relationship with Vanessa at the outset, only revealing this aspect of his life at the end of the novel, along with the rest of the plan.

Nathan Cooley

Nathan is initially a sympathetic character. He is a relatively young man who is trying to stay away from his family’s drug trade. Grisham uses Nathan to underline two additional failures in the justice system. The DEA assassination of Nathan’s brother is a crime that will go unpunished. Nathan also provides a thoughtful analysis of the role of the drug trade in a depressed economy. Grisham therefore uses this character to surmise why a basically decent young man might fall into the drug trade. Malcolm has also previously remarked that many of the young men in Frostburg are drug offenders who are being punished unfairly for nonviolent crimes. Nathan initially seems to be one of that number, but he is eventually revealed to be something quite different from his outward appearance. He is in reality a ruthless killer who tortures a woman and murders two people, and he shows no remorse for doing so. He has no personal vendetta against the judge, much less against the woman he tortures. His motive is entirely based on greed.

Nathan’s actions give rise to an additional ethical consideration, for although he is the one who commits the murders, Malcolm does nothing to stop him. A timely warning to the prison administration might have prevented the judge’s death. Instead, Malcolm makes himself an accessory not only to the killing of the judge, who was at least a criminal himself, but also to the murder of an innocent woman. Like Nathan, Malcolm uses pressure to get access to the gold. Unlike Nathan, Malcolm uses nonlethal means to extract the information.

Henry Bannister

Malcolm’s stiff-necked father is a former state trooper. As an officer of the law, he has a rigid belief in the infallibility of the justice system; therefore, in his mind, conviction is proof of guilt. This betrayal of Malcolm’s trust is what allows Malcolm to break ties with him.

Henry’s willingness to believe in Malcolm’s guilt exemplifies the tendency for the public to assume that law enforcement officers and the justice system in general have some special ability to accurately identify criminals. Henry does try to show his love for Malcolm by visiting him dutifully every month, but he doesn’t hide his disappointment in his son, and he chides Malcolm for resenting the very system that betrayed him.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text