logo

27 pages 54 minutes read

Bessie Head

The Prisoner Who Wore Glasses

Fiction | Short Story | Adult | Published in 1963

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Character Analysis

Brille

Brille is a dynamic character and the protagonist of the story, whose internal growth of centering himself within his belief system propels the narrative forward. Although Brille is characterized as physically weak—he has a “hollowed-out chest and comic knobbly knees” (Paragraph 2)—he demonstrates an internal strength that has a strong foundation in his self-worth.

Brille’s character development is centered around his identity as a father. Through flashback, it becomes evident how Brille’s children, while not present in the main narrative, affect how he acts and thinks. Since he felt compelled to discipline his children, he regrets that he used politics to escape his personal life. However, Brille’s encounter with Hannetjie causes him to rethink his imagined message to his children about cooperation meaning their lives will go smoothly. He learns in prison that obeying authority will not always result in fairness and justice, and this insight allows for the resolution of Brille’s internal conflict: He stands up for his own humanity when he confronts Hannetjie’s racist actions.

Brille’s role as a father gives him authority over Hannetjie because he realizes that “the man really [is] a child” (Paragraph 55). Although he is no longer naive, Brille sees the humanity of and even pities the man who abused him while still holding Hannetjie accountable for his actions.

Warder Hannetjie

Jacobus Stephanus Hannetjie is the white warder and antagonist in the story. Hannetjie is characterized by his brutality, abusiveness, and childish trust, but this dynamic character reveals his own humanity when he realizes the injustice of his abuse toward others. In the end, he even contributes to Span One’s workload, showing them more kindness than his initial agreement to Brille’s terms required.

Head describes Hannetjie more than any of the characters in the story. Since he is Dutch South African, he speaks with a unique dialect; he is young and white and has piercing blue eyes. Hannetjie’s eyes have a conflicting nature because they are blue like “the color of the sky but they [are] frightening” (Paragraph 5). Although nature, particularly the sky, is a motif of freedom throughout the story, Head inverts this motif when describing Hannetjie to symbolize both familiarity and otherness. As the oppressor, Hannetjie’s dehumanization of himself and Span One begins immediately. He has a “primitive, brutal soul” that causes Span One to think he is not quite human (Paragraph 5). Yet Hannetjie’s oppressive, elitist mentality proves to be only skin deep: once he experiences degradation and dehumanization firsthand, he crumbles.

In the second half of the story, Head replaces Hannetjie’s descriptions of otherness with childish characteristics. The narrative purpose in this replacement is to reveal how Hannetjie, like other Dutch South Africans, is so selfishly focused on himself that he has never thought to question his worldview, empathize with Black South Africans, or analyze how the orders he blindly follows affect real human beings. Head uses irony in this instance by showing that Hannetjie, the white warder who does not have glasses, is far less perceptive than Brille, the prisoner who wears glasses.

Martha and the Children

Martha is a static, secondary character. She is Brille’s wife and appears in the narrative only during Brille’s flashback when he thinks about his home. She is characterized by her role as a mother, as well as her inability to enforce discipline in the home.

Although Martha is a minor character, her memory motivates Brille to stand up to Hannetjie. Since Martha has been left alone to raise their 12 children by herself, Brille is compelled to survive prison and make it back to her alive. Although Brille’s time with Martha at home was not happy or peaceful, Brille feels guilty over how he used his political career to escape his home, giving Martha the burden of raising the children.

Even though the 12 children are never named, Brille sees similarity between his position as a father and Hannetjie’s position as a warder. At home, Brille played a role like Hannetjie, in that his severity in punishing his children was seen as necessary to their well-being. The children were allowed to fight and skirmish in Martha’s presence until he came home. Brille even thought that his severe presence could “change savages into fairly reasonable human beings” (Paragraph 24). Brille’s relationship with his children is an inversion of Hannetjie’s relationship with Span One. Once Brille makes this connection, he realizes that the way he parented his children was wrong, and he regrets not being able to tell them this. However, the relationship with his family aids Brille in abolishing Hannetjie’s oppressive system, restoring his own sense of humanity.

Span One

Although Span One is made up of a group of 10 political prisoners, the span collectively operates as a single character within the text. Head establishes this at the beginning of the story in that the group often thinks and acts as one. Span One is passive because they never intervene or directly aid narrative progression, but their presence is central to the setting and main themes of Community Versus Individualism.

Span One is characterized by their innocence and the inherent internal strength that they hold onto with this knowledge. The reason they are so difficult to control by the warders is because they do not act like guilty prisoners who are easily subdued; this is because they know they are innocent. The warders before Hannetjie knew this instinctively and felt too guilty to beat or harass anyone from Span One. Head describes Span One’s power of innocence as the reason why Span One is so strong and how it should be a “clue to the strange terror they arouse[] in the warders” (Paragraph 9). However, Hannetjie has been so indoctrinated in the Nationalist Party’s propaganda that he does not feel shame in the way that the other warders do.

Span One’s dialogue and figures of speech are central to their presence in the story. They continually call each other “comrade,” which emphasizes their leftism as well as their democratic existence. Their diction, which is reminiscent of the Communist party, reminds the reader that Span One comprises political prisoners; the apartheid government also banned Communism and imprisoned Communists and anti-government activists. Although most of the dialogue occurs between Hannetjie and Brille, there are a few lines between Brille and Span One. In one of these instances, Span One refers to Brille as “brother,” going on to say that “what happens to one of [them], happens to all” (Paragraph 22). This signifies the importance of group mentality and their commitment to each other. Even at the end of the short story, Span One reciprocates aid for Hannetjie, rather than casting him out. For Span One, preservation of community is more important than any one person’s individual desires, even if it is a warder who was previously against them.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text