logo

52 pages 1 hour read

Leïla Slimani

The Perfect Nanny

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2016

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Effects of Classism on Caregivers

Classism and the power hierarchies that it informs are central themes in The Perfect Nanny, often intertwined with themes of sexism and racism. The Massé family and Louise represent opposite poles of a classist dichotomy: Louise holds a lower socioeconomic status, barely affording to live in the suburbs of Paris and has a “low class” job, while Paul and Myriam are middle or upper-middle class, living in the 10th district of Paris and working in music (Paul) and law (Myriam). The characters with the superior status frequently exercise their power over the lower status Louise. They have her work long hours and even bring her with them on vacation, dictating her schedule—something that Louise presumably could not, or would not, argue against, as she relies on the Massés to earn a living.

Louise’s lower class status results in her often being objectified, treated as less than human. When they invite Louise on vacation, Paul automatically assumes that Louise will be delighted to join them. He can’t fathom that she’d have a life of her own, outside of caring for children—especially children that aren’t hers. The way Paul talks about Louise also reflects an attitude of Louise being some sort of object, at best a pet or a child. Not an adult woman. These microaggressions through language serve to put Louise in her place, so to speak, reminding her that she is “less than” Paul and Myriam—she is beneath them.

Although the Massés want to maintain their classist authority over Louise, they also don’t want to confront the socioeconomic disparity between themselves and their nanny directly. They are awkward and embarrassed when they are forcibly reminded of Louise’s lower status. Paul “blames Louise for having brought her poverty, her frailties all the way here” when he learns she can’t swim, and thus can’t take the children swimming while they’re on vacation (69). Paul and Myriam are also perturbed when they learn about Louise owing back taxes, focusing on their own discomfort rather than Louise’s. In response to their awkwardness in the face of Louise’s poverty, the Massés go out of their way to conceal some of their upper class advantages. For example, when Myriam goes shopping, she hides the new clothes until Louise is gone for the day and “Paul congratulates her on being so tactful” (55). However, such actions are only to avoid their own discomfort. Myriam doesn’t truly care about Louise’s feelings: She is simply afraid of offending Louise and doesn’t want to lose her, and her own freedom to work in the process.

Stéphanie also embodies the theme of classicism. She is a prime example of how the elite leverage power hierarchies to assert their authority over the lower class. Stéphanie is unwelcome at a nice school, and when she struggles to acclimate, the administration take the opportunity to kick her out instead of trying to work with her and Louise to help her adjust. When Stéphanie joins Louise to accompany the Rouvier family on holiday, the Rouviers are uncomfortable with Stéphanie, the child of “the help,” taking part in the holiday like the other children. They always find a job for her to do, reminding her that she isn’t like the upper-class kids—she’s there because her mom, Louise, works for them. These are microaggressions designed to remind Stéphanie, a child, that she belongs to the lower class like her mother.

The Intersectionality of Racism and Classism

Racism is often intertwined with themes of classism within the book. Overt racism is immediately apparent in the first line of the narrative proper (following the Introduction), when Paul tells Myriam not to hire “illegal immigrants […] Apart from that… not too old, no veils, and no smokers” (5). Paul’s stance is both anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant, as well as ageist.

Louise’s character is used to explore racist themes in a unique way thanks to her whiteness. Being a white, French nanny is unusual. Louise stands out from the other nannies (women of color and immigrants) on the playground. When Paul and Myriam hire Louise, she similarly stands out from the other applicants: Gigi, “a Filipino woman,” who “expresses herself very poorly in French;” Grace, “a smiling, undocumented immigrant from the Ivory Coast;” Caroline, “an obese blonde with dirty hair;” and Malika, “a Moroccan woman of a certain age” (17-18). It's implied that part of what makes Louise so appealing to Paul and Myriam, part of the reason she is “the perfect nanny,” is her whiteness and her French-ness. The author subversively challenges racist assumptions by making the perfect white nanny the ultimate villain.

Louise’s whiteness also gives her other advantages. Her landlord automatically assumes she will be a better tenant than people of color, “because renting to a white in [that] neighborhood is practically unheard of” (149). However, Louise fails to make rent; later chapters also show that her home is largely imperfect. It’s dirty and poorly maintained, and Louise hates being there.

Racism is also explored through Myriam’s character, who is herself a woman of color who speaks Arabic. Myriam specifically doesn’t want to hire an Arabic-speaking nanny because “[s]he has always been wary of what she calls immigrant solidarity” (18). This represents yet another type of prejudice: the kind exerted against one’s own people. This is the opposite of racism against the “other”, yet its impact on the individuals affected is just as valid.

Motherhood and Social Judgment

The theme of motherhood and the harsh judgment society casts on mothers is primarily explored through the character of Myriam. When Myriam is home with her children, she desperately misses her career as a lawyer and wants to return to work. Ashamed of this desire, she hides “how she [feels] as if she were dying because she [has] nothing to talk about but the antics of her children and the conversations of strangers overheard in the supermarket” (9). At the same time, Myriam is afraid to tell others that she’s out of work because she knows that stay-at-home mothers are not respected within society.

When Myriam does go back to work, she faces a different kind of judgment. As a working mother, she’s seen as neglectful or absentee. Myriam is also criticized by Sylvie, her mother-in-law. The book alludes to a fight Myriam and Sylvie once had, in which “Sylvie reproached her for devoting too much time to her job” (126). Even during Louise’s trial, Myriam faces societal judgment when “[t]he lawyer [portrays] Myriam as an ‘absent mother,’ an ‘abusive employer’” (81). Despite her horrific loss, Myriam must endure the trauma of being painted as a cold-hearted, detached, self-centered villain.

It seems that Myriam can’t win. If she stays home, she’s criticized by society. If she goes to work, she’s criticized by society. Meanwhile, Paul does not seem to face any such judgments. The book thus argues against the unreasonable standards that women are held to as mothers compared to the standards set for men as fathers. These standards are deeply informed by sexism. Society often takes a sexist view towards tasks deemed stereotypically for women or mothers. Even though Jacques, Louise’s former husband, is unemployed and debt-ridden, he views himself as “above” Louise because he doesn’t engage in women’s work. Similarly, while Paul never had to question whether or not he could return to work, he seems surprised that Myriam wants to do so. The idea of a woman with children desiring a life of her own, outside of her role as a mother, doesn’t even occur to him.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text