54 pages • 1 hour read
John GrishamA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Patrick Lanigan is an anti-hero with a mix of sympathetic and unsympathetic characteristics. The complexity of his character helps the novel explore the boundaries of good and evil. He is calculating and a thief. He uses his friend’s body to fake his own death. He also defrauded the life insurance company that paid out to his wife and her child. To his credit, Patrick is also bold, meticulous, intelligent, and vulnerable, as he demonstrates by falling in love with Eva and trusting her. The love story between them makes him a sympathetic character and shows that he is capable of real feeling.
The crimes Patrick has committed are mitigated by their circumstances and his backstory shows that he was a well-meaning, unhappy young lawyer who saw an opportunity to escape with relatively little moral sacrifice. His character prompts the reader to consider how they themselves might behave in his circumstances. The novel engages the reader’s vicarious sympathy through Patrick’s dream of escape from a life of drudgery and disappointment. This is what creates the heist anti-hero dynamic, where the reader is meant to empathize with and root for an “everyman” underdog. Initially, Patrick planned to live a simple life, supporting himself modestly. He tells Sandy that if the heist hadn’t worked out, he would still have gone through with the rest of the plan. The theft gave him the gratification of revenge on the partners who planned to cheat and betray him. However, far from enhancing his freedom, the money robbed him of the peace he wanted. Eva’s final betrayal is a blessing in disguise, breaking his heart but gifting him with a more meaningful life. Patrick comes to realize that his happiness relies on freedom and not on wealth.
Eva Miranda is Patrick’s love interest. Like the other women in The Partner, Eva is not a complex character although her function in the plot is significant. She is a foil to Patrick and one meaning of the “partner” that the punning title refers to.
Eva was always motivated by money, success, and prestige. Her name makes reference to the biblical Eve: Although she isn’t the cause of Patrick’s temptation, she is a morally compromised character who ultimately gives into the temptation to put money before love. Absconding with the money suggests that she was never truly in love with Patrick and so she prioritizes her wealth over him. In leaving Patrick alone and poor at the end of the story, the narrative is enabled to show Patrick in a noble light, as man who has learned a lesson and a deeper understanding of himself.
Eva’s action serves as contrast to Patrick’s static plot in custody. His narrative centers around legal procedure and machinations in a tight setting; her character provides faster action and suspense, often in a glamorous location. Her action also helps to contextualize the anxiety and stress that she and Patrick felt before his capture. While he feels some relief at being in custody, she must still evade the criminals who wish to harm her. In some ways, she feels deserted by Patrick. When the stress mounts and the consequences come home to her with the abduction of her father and her own imprisonment, Eva begins to see that Patrick isn’t so romantic after all, especially when she feels that he is moving her around like a chess piece. When she returns the bulk of the money and Aricia is arrested, there is no longer anyone to pursue her, and she is free to walk away with the money. She can’t have both Patrick and the money and, as her love for him has diminished, the money wins out.
Jack Stephano is the most active villain of the novel. As the private detective in the pay of Patrick’s enemies, he provides a good deal of the momentum and action as the main pursuer of Patrick and Eva. His character makes Patrick more sympathetic to the reader: Patrick is a flawed character, but Stephano’s exaggeratedly bad qualities makes Patrick’s decisions appear more forgivable. His willingness to commit reprehensible acts in order to be paid makes his character key to the novel’s exploration of money and corruption. Stephano also illustrates the potentially redeeming importance of human connections as his decision to cooperate with the FBI is influenced by his wife.
Benny Aricia is 60 years old but looks younger. He is tanned and fit and lives with a Swedish woman young enough to be his daughter. Benny resented being assigned to a branch of Platt & Rockwood that he saw as limiting. He chose to retaliate by setting up a racket that will make the company appear to be cheating the government.
Benny might appear at first to be an honorable whistle-blower, but he is deeply corrupt, self-entitled, and sadistic. His character is part of the novel’s cynical treatment of success and the moral price that some will pay for it.
Trudy Lanigan is Partick’s estranged wife. She considered herself his widow until he was captured. She is physically beautiful, greedy, and amoral. She married Patrick for his financial prospects although she always loved Lance. Trudy’s character is really a caricature: She is the archetypal evil “femme fatale.” Her role in the story is to embody the corruption of the world Patrick wanted to escape. Trudy’s corruption highlights Patrick’s sense of responsibility. The narrative suggests that Trudy doesn’t deserve the life insurance payout, but portrays Patrick as noble for providing for her and her child in spite of everything he knows about her. Trudy also contrasts with the supportive families of “good” characters like Huskey and Sandy whose families give them a sense of meaning in life and incentivize them to live within the bounds of society and morality.
Sandy McDermott is Patrick’s old friend and his lawyer through the case. As an interlocutor he is essential to the narrative, as he provides a reason for the exposition of the backstory. His character is a proxy for the reader as he pieces the facts together. He also illustrates Patrick’s ability to inspire loyalty. Sandy demonstrates the importance of supportive friendship and family in giving meaning to life and providing a moral code. Sandy is occasionally exasperated by the demands Patrick makes on him when they conflict with his family obligations. Although Sandy envies and admires Patrick’s escape, the sense of meaning provided by his family and work is more compelling to him.
Judge Huskey is an old friend of Patrick. Despite this, he takes control of Patrick’s case before the trial opens and he must recuse himself. This is a morally gray area. He cares more about his friend than about the letter of the law: He won’t violate the law outright, especially since to do so would actually harm Patrick in the long run. However, he is happy to stretch his role and position to its limit in order to do what he considers right. Huskey is a warm and respectable character and his affection for Patrick speaks to Patrick’s good character. His role in the novel is also to explore the limits of the judiciary and how powerful individuals have the ability to bias the law and justice, even when they act out of good intentions.
Clovis is an unusual ally character in that he assists Patrick after his death. Patrick uses Clovis’s body as the decoy when he stages his own death. Clovis is a lonely old man in need who Patrick made friends with and was generous to. Clovis was a client but after the case ends Patrick continues to visit Clovis and looks after him. When Clovis died, Patrick saw that his body would enable an escape plan. The relationship between Clovis and Patrick shows that, under usual circumstances, Patrick is a kind and empathetic man, but Clovis’s body is symbol of Patrick’s self-interestedness.
By John Grisham