logo

49 pages 1 hour read

Elena Ferrante

The Lost Daughter

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2006

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Motherhood and the Complexity of Female Identity

The Lost Daughter questions the assumption that motherhood is every woman’s ultimate purpose. Through the experiences of several women who do or do not have children, the novel addresses the taboo of maternal ambivalence and unravels the myth of the so-called natural mother. It explores the multifaceted nature of female identity, which is often crushed by the responsibility of motherhood. Although “[a] woman’s body does a thousand different things” (36), it is relegated to this one absolute purpose.

The women in the novel can be divided into two primary categories: those who believe that motherhood is a woman’s most important role and those who seek fulfillment outside motherhood. Leda and Nina belong to this latter category. Initially, Leda wants children. However, it is difficult to separate her desire from societal expectations in which women are meant to have children, and not wanting one is unthinkable. The romantic image of motherhood is shattered almost immediately upon having her babies. A “crushing weight of responsibility” replaces the optimism of youth (42), and “every other game was over for” Leda, a 25-year-old woman at the time (37). Leda found she could be nothing but a mother, like her embittered female ancestors before her.

Nina at first appears as a foil to Leda: a “perfect mother” who embraces her role contentedly. However, Leda learns that Nina is secretly struggling too. Nina wants to know the details of why Leda left her daughters but approaches the subject cautiously, showing “hostility” when Leda expresses the happiness she felt away from her daughters. The taboo surrounding material ambivalence makes it difficult for the women to connect and help one another. Nina does not dare articulate her restlessness nor ask Leda questions directly. She resorts instead to making “a gesture to indicate a vertigo but also a feeling of nausea” (119). The topic is difficult to address because other women, like Rosaria and Lucilla, cannot imagine womanhood without motherhood. Failing as a mother is akin to failing as a woman.

Leda often defines motherhood as a “shattering” or a “sense of dissolving” (84). She feels that women aren’t allowed to be anything but mothers, and this denies the complexity of female identity. Leda, a creative and educated woman, struggles to exist in a society that doesn’t allow her to inhabit multiple identities. She gives up her daughters because she cannot simultaneously care for them and pursue her career, but she loves and misses them. When she returns, she is “resigned” to the only model of motherhood that has been presented to her: “living very little for [her]self and a great deal for the two children” (118). Slowly she learns how to put her daughters first.

Leda’s story addresses the social narratives surrounding pregnancy and motherhood, which tend to romanticize the experience while obscuring the difficulties. Because these narratives convince all women that motherhood should come naturally, women like Leda and Nina, who struggle with maternal ambivalence, are ostracized and ignored.

Language, Education, and Social Class

Much of the conflict between Leda and the Neapolitan family is built on tensions between social classes, largely represented by differences in language and education. The Lost Daughter explores language as it relates to and constructs identity, including the complexities of class identity and belonging. Leda, a professor of English literature, fought to extract herself from the “black well” of Naples by studying literature and ridding herself of the Neapolitan dialect in favor of “proper Italian.” However, hearing the Neapolitan family speak in the dialect of her childhood unleashes a flood of memories that shows Leda she has not escaped as fully as she would like to believe.

Language and education have always symbolized independence to Leda. From a young age, Leda was a social climber, a young girl with her heart set on a life outside of the violence and poverty of Naples. She “aspired to a bourgeois decorum, proper Italian, a good life, cultured and reflective” (87). More than anything, Leda wanted to avoid becoming like her mother, a woman “poisoned by her unhappiness” (20-21) and prone to spitting insults in harsh dialect when she became angry.

From the outside, Leda has successfully become a “reasonable and educated woman” (94). Nina tells Leda she looks like a “lady” who “know[s] a great many things” (115), and she tells her husband that Leda is “not like” their family. However, spending time near the Neapolitans, Leda realizes she isn’t much different from them. When she asks the Dutch family to move umbrellas, she worries she spreads the Neapolitans’ “overbearing disorder,” which is “in substance a discourtesy” (27). Even though she has learned to speak properly in multiple languages, Leda still carries the essence of Naples. She reflects that there is still a “timbre of the dialect that surfaces” when she speaks (90), which her daughters “cruelly mock.”

Unlike their mother, Leda’s daughters grew up reciting poetry, “cultured even in their family lexicon” (100). Consequently, Bianca and Marta “belong to another time” (90); Leda reflects that they do not face the danger of slipping back into the language and habits of Naples the way she does. Leda has become more cultured than her mother, but her children have gone yet one step further. In this respect, the novel suggests that language and education don’t fundamentally change who you are. It takes several generations to truly leave behind the markings of one’s class and family background.

The Relationship Between the Past and Present

The past is ever apparent in Leda’s narration, affecting her present and sometimes even producing physical sensations of sickness. Through flashbacks and memories, the novel illustrates the continued influence of the past on the present, especially in the context of family legacy and cultural expectations that create generational patterns which are destined to repeat.

Leda’s experience with motherhood directly results from her relationships with her mother and grandmother and, in turn, their experiences with motherhood. Generations of women in Leda’s family have experienced what Leda calls “a shattering,” which amounts to a feeling of maternal ambivalence and loss of identity. None of these women had an outlet for their feelings, so they were passed on to their daughters, creating “a chain of mute or angry women” stretching up to the present (71). Upon becoming a mother, Leda felt herself moving back in time to become part of this chain. She resisted by abandoning her daughters to pursue her career.

Spending time with the Neapolitans sends Leda back in time once again. She describes, “Like a magnet, the present—yesterday, today—was drawing to itself all the past days of my life” (91). Hearing the Neapolitan dialect and watching Nina and Elena constantly makes Leda think about her daughters and her childhood. At one point, Leda’s narration even switches from the past to the present tense as she describes the incidents that led to her abandoning her children. She says, “I feel the child’s tears under my fingertips, I’m still hurting her” (73). The entire paragraph continues in the present as Leda describes hitting Bianca and shoving her out of the room. The next paragraph, describing the broken pane of glass, returns to the past tense. This confusion between past and present suggests that Leda still sees the past as part of her current experience.

While Leda struggles to detach herself from the past, she reflects that her daughters have moved away from her in both time and space. She thinks that Bianca and Marta seem to belong “to the future” (89). They live far away and have escaped the generational patterns of the women in Leda’s family. However, the past is still strongly reflected in Nina, a young woman who remains part of “the chain” of Neapolitan women that Leda tried to escape. She is trapped in the “shattering” of motherhood, limited by a lack of opportunities and education, just as Leda’s female ancestors were.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text