logo

68 pages 2 hours read

Benjamin Graham

The Intelligent Investor

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1949

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 18-20Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 18 Summary: “A Comparison of Eight Pairs of Companies”

Graham provides eight case studies to illustrate the different structures, policies, and performances of companies and their stocks. Each case study compares two companies with similar names. The first pair consists of Real Estate Investment Trust and Realty Equities Corp. of New York. He characterizes the former as “all that has been reasonable, stable, and generally good in the traditional methods of handling other people’s money” (446). On the other hand, he describes Realty Equities Corp. as a speculative operation with questionable management and overly ambitious expansion plans.

The second comparison features Air Products & Chemicals and Air Reduction Co. Graham explains that while both companies operate in the industrial gas industry, Air Products & Chemicals is the stronger contender with a growing market share and higher profit margins. The third case study concerns American Home Products Co. and American Hospital Supply Co. He characterizes them as “two ‘billion-dollar good-will’ companies” (453)—in other words, two companies with a significant amount of intangible power due to their reputations and brand names. He concludes that both have stock prices that are too high.

The fourth pair of companies are H & R Block Inc. and Blue Bell Inc. He describes Blue Bell as fighting steadily to become a leader in its industry, while H & R Block experienced rapid and significant growth. The fifth comparison is between International Flavors & Fragrances and International Harvester Co. He believes that neither company meets his criteria for investment, as International Flavors & Fragrances is too expensive and International Harvester has poor financial stability.

The sixth comparison is between McGraw Edison and McGraw-Hill Inc. While their stocks are priced similarly, Hill is valued much higher. Graham attributes that to the public’s enthusiasm for McGraw-Hill’s industry. The seventh duo is National General Corp. and National Presto Industries. Graham characterizes Presto’s diversification as moderate but views General as an unwieldy conglomerate.

The eighth and final case study features Whiting Corp. and Wilcox & Gibbs. Graham sees this comparison as an example of the irrationality of the market. While Wilcox has much smaller sales, it is valued significantly higher than Whiting.

Commentary on Chapter 18

Zweig updates Graham’s examples with eight pairs of his own: Cisco and Sysco; Yahoo! and Yum!; Commerce One and Capital One; Palm and 3Com; CMGI and CGI; Ball and Stryker; Nortel and Nortek; and Red Hat and Brown Shoe. Zweig underscores the irrational behavior of investors during the late-’90s tech boom. In his eighth case study, he illustrates how software company Red Hat became extremely overvalued, while footwear wholesaler Brown Shoe, which belonged to a less glamorous industry, produced steady sales. However, Zweig notes, “The market scoffs at Graham’s principles in the short run, but they are always revalidated in the end” (486). Red Hat continued to lose money and its stock eventually fell, whereas Brown Shoe went on to produce consistent profits.

Chapter 19 Summary: “Shareholders and Managements: Dividend Policy”

Graham discusses shareholder activism, or the actions taken by shareholders to influence the governance of companies. While he previously advocated for shareholders to exercise their agency and hold management accountable, he now writes that:

In the last 36 years practically nothing has actually been accomplished through intelligent action by the great body of shareholders. A sensible crusader—if there are any such—would take this as a sign that he has been wasting his time, and that he had better give up the fight (487).

Looking back on the previous decades, Graham concludes that the notion of shareholders exercising their voices now seems too romantic, and he claims it proved to be futile.

Graham goes on to explore various dividend policies such as regular dividends, extra dividends, or no dividends at all. Previously, he notes, companies that did not pay dividends (while claiming to use the money for growth) were often met with criticism and faced pressure from shareholders. However, he sees that the landscape has evolved and companies that retain earnings rather than paying out dividends are now more accepted. Nevertheless, Graham has observed that companies that do not pay dividends tend to underperform their dividend-paying counterparts in terms of stock price appreciation.

Graham examines the concept of stock splitting and its impact on shareholders. Stock splitting, as Graham explains, is the practice of dividing existing shares into multiple shares, resulting in a lower price per share. He states that while stock splits may seem attractive to shareholders, as it lowers the price per share and may lead to increased liquidity, the actual impact on shareholder wealth is negligible.

Commentary on Chapter 19

Zweig explores why Graham gave up the fight to encourage shareholders to exercise their voices. He notes that this chapter was the one that was changed the most from the original edition of the book. Graham cut out a huge portion of his arguments, reducing it to a brief passage on the futility of shareholder activism followed by a discussion on dividends.

Zweig goes further by chastising modern investors for having “forgotten Graham’s message,” saying that they “put most of their effort into buying a stock, a little into selling it—but none into owning it” (499). Zweig exhorts investors to read companies’ proxy statements, vote against managers they believe are incompetent, attend annual shareholder meetings, and connect with other shareholders via message boards.

Chapter 20 Summary: “‘Margin of Safety’ as the Central Concept of Investment”

The margin of safety refers to the difference between the intrinsic value of a share and the price at which it is bought. Graham emphasizes the importance of purchasing stocks at a significant discount to their intrinsic value to protect investors from potential downturns in the market. He connects the concept of “margin of safety” with the practice of diversification. Graham believes that by diversifying their investments, investors can further mitigate risks and increase their margin of safety.

He reiterates his views on investment versus speculation. Graham emphasizes that investing should be approached as a long-term, rational process based on analysis and sound principles. By contrast, speculation is characterized by short-term, emotional decision-making driven by market fluctuations and rumors. Graham talks about the importance of price when evaluating the attractiveness of an investment. He argues that price is a crucial factor in determining the margin of safety.

He concludes that intelligent investment is similar to running a business. Investors should approach their investments with the same diligence and rationality as a business owner would. He emphasizes research, caution, and confidence based on sound analysis—even if this analysis contradicts what is popular in the market. Finally, he affirms that the investor who seeks modest—not astronomical—results will achieve long-term success and financial security.

Commentary on Chapter 20

Zweig emphasizes avoidance of loss, saying that “to be an intelligent investor, you must take responsibility for ensuring that you never lose most or all of your money” (526). He illustrates how difficult it is to break even again after a loss in capital. Zweig says that the best way to avoid loss is to avoid overpaying for stocks in the first place: “By refusing to pay too much for an investment, you minimize the chances that your wealth will ever disappear or suddenly be destroyed” (527). He concludes by reiterating the importance of managing one’s emotions when investing, saying that “financial risk resides not in what kinds of investments you have, but in what kind of investor you are” (528). Ultimately, self-awareness and adequate risk management are crucial for successful investing.

Chapters 18-20 Analysis

In this final section, Graham rounds out his arguments with case studies of companies before distilling his teachings into core concepts. The breadth and depth of Graham’s analysis—in this section and throughout the book—shows that he is willing to detail the complex reasoning behind his simple strategies and reinforce them with evidence from the real world.

One of the key themes in these chapters is focusing on a security’s fundamentals, such as earnings, dividends, and managerial competence. By delving into case studies of various companies, Graham highlights the practical application of his investment principles and demonstrates the value of analyzing a company’s fundamental factors to make informed investment decisions. Graham’s emphasis on the stability of earnings, growth potential, and the price-to-earnings ratio highlights the significance of conducting fundamental analysis when selecting stocks.

Graham’s nuanced arguments culminate in The Principles of Value Investing. He simplifies his teachings by saying, “In the old legend the wise men finally boiled down the history of mortal affairs into the single phrase, ‘This too shall pass.’ Confronted with a like challenge to distill the secret of sound investment into three words, we venture the motto, MARGIN OF SAFETY” (512). Graham’s emphasis on the margin of safety encapsulates the essence of value investing. Ultimately, Graham sees value investing as rooted in price and analysis rather than prediction and sentiment. He views the margin of safety as a liberating principle that frees the investor from focusing on short-term market fluctuations and instead allows them to focus on the long-term intrinsic value of a company:

Here the function of the margin of safety is, in essence, that of rendering unnecessary an accurate estimate of the future. If the margin is a large one, then it is enough to assume that future earnings will not fall far below those of the past in order for an investor to feel sufficiently protected against the vicissitudes of time (513).

The margin of safety alleviates the pressure to predict the future, which Graham concludes is a difficult and unreliable endeavor.

Overall, Graham’s principles serve to protect and guide investors in making sound investment decisions, placing the focus on factors within their control—including their reactions and their assessment of a stock’s intrinsic value—rather than relying on external market forces.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text