logo

43 pages 1 hour read

Anton Chekhov

The Duel

Fiction | Novella | Adult | Published in 1891

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 9-14Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapters 9-14 Summary

In the immediate wake of the picnic, when Laevsky and Nadyezhda Fyodorovna are equally downcast, Laevsky finally informs Nadyezhda Fyodorovna of the death of her husband. She sinks further into grief and self-disgust, while Laevsky seeks solace at Samoylenko’s, despite the late hour of the night. Laevsky requests money for a ticket to Petersburg from Samoylenko, but Samoylenko has none to give. Samoylenko nevertheless seeks to borrow money from others on Laevsky’s behalf, feeling his protectiveness of Laevsky redouble with the memory of Von Koren’s hatred, which hovers like a threat over the defenseless Laevsky.

In his exchange with Samoylenko, Laevsky takes his turn commenting on Von Koren, calling his nature despotic and in fact correctly surmising that Von Koren has already told Samoylenko that he, Laevsky, ought to be destroyed. Laevsky astutely attributes Von Koren’s ire to his general drive toward the purification of mediocrity and the destruction of morals in favor of ideals, or what Von Koren himself would call the common good. Unlike Von Koren’s assessment of Laevsky, however, Laevsky sees the value in Von Koren’s type, even if he warns of its dangers. Laevsky ends his assessment of Von Koren with his sharpest self-criticism yet, “bowing humbly before Von Koren’s hatred” in the recognition of his own deceptiveness (136).

Marya Konstantinovna visits Nadyezhda Fyodorovna upon learning the news of Nadyezhda Fyodorovna’s husband’s death, hoping that Nadyezhda Fyodorovna and Laevsky will take the opportunity to get married. Nadyezhda Fyodorovna rejects the idea, viewing it as an unnecessary constraint on her freedom, which she feels has thus far been constrained enough. Marya Konstantinovna responds with a condemnation of Nadyezhda Fyodorovna as “a terrible sinner,” considering Laevsky blameless and calling Nadyezhda Fyodorovna immodest in her lack of (at least visible) self-condemnation. Nadyezhda Fyodorovna sobs, convinced that she must marry but viewing the prospect as impossible when she recalls her recent infidelity with Atchmianov, who she hoped would cancel her debt. She becomes feverish at the thought of repaying him and is near-delirious when Laevsky returns. Laevsky feels pity for her and asks her forgiveness, but still returns to Samoylenko’s to collect the borrowed money.

Samoylenko was unable to find an adequate amount, promising to do so by the time the next steamer departs. Samoylenko asks Von Koren for the money, who suspects it is for Laevsky and refuses to give it unless Samoylenko demands that Laevsky send Nadyezhda Fyodorovna to Petersburg before he himself departs, forestalling the possibility of his abandoning his mistress altogether. During their conversation, Samoylenko asks about the usefulness of destructive animals in a clear allusion to Von Koren’s notion of the destructiveness of Laevsky, and he does so since Von Koren is engaged in his zoological work. Von Koren responds that such animals ensure the survival of the fittest. He speaks of moles that collaborate to build a battle arena before they fight one another. When the debate over helping Laevsky arises, Von Koren expresses frustration that love for man should derive from rational calculation and not indiscriminate feeling.

At a birthday celebration at Marya Konstantinovna’s, Von Koren and Samoylenko continue their debate, with Von Koren disapproving of the unmarried couple’s lack of shame and approving of the ultimate self-destruction of the heroine of Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina. Samoylenko lends Laevsky money and tells him of Von Koren’s condition. Laevsky is shocked and begins repeating “Friday,” the day of his desired departure, much as Nadyezhda Fyodorovna had begun repeating “at first a hundred, then another hundred,” in her own delirium. Laevsky is undone most of all by the recognition that someone else has perceived the deception that “he had so long and carefully concealed from himself” (173). He envisions the many lies he would have to tell to continue his life as he had planned: “a whole mountain of lies” (175). Although Laevsky has this recognition about himself, he feels unable to do anything else.

Meanwhile at the party, Nadyezhda Fyodorovna is suffering in shame and makes plans to run away in order to free Laevsky. She imagines finding work to send him money anonymously, but Atchmianov and Kirilin press her for further liaisons. In a parlor game, where notes are written anonymously, the men demand her attention, while Laevsky, who receives notes taunting him about his planned departure, has an attack of hysterics. Ashamed, Laevsky pretends to have felt a pain in his side and holds himself there, although “no one, except Nadyezhda Fyodorovna, believed him” (184).

When Laevsky asks Kirlin to see Nadyezhda Fyodorovna home, Nadyezhda Fyodorovna imagines herself as “a fly that had fallen into an inkpot […] smirching Laevsky’s side and arm with blackness” (186). Kirilin demands another meeting and threatens to make a scandal. Atchmianov looks for Nadyezhda Fyodorovna and, sitting on a bench, sees her walking with Kirilin. Kirilin calls after her where they should next meet, at Muridov’s—a fact Atchmianov uses to expose Nadyezhda Fyodorovna when he later tells Laevsky to go to Muridov’s at the given time.

Chapters 9-14 Analysis

Laevsky continues his surprising combination of an insightfulness about his own faults and his persistent excusing of precisely those same faults. This insight reaches its peak together with his behavior, as he urgently seeks escape at the same time he feels the truth of Von Koren’s hatred of him. The two sides of his consciousness are sharpening at the same time. In Laevsky’s conversation with Samoylenko over the money he needs for his escape, Laevsky makes plain that he needs Von Koren as a mirror for himself. Strikingly, the more Laevsky is able to discern Von Koren’s own faults, the more he is able to see his own.

Laevsky’s criticism of Nadyezhda Fyodorovna as a coquette, however, comes from a less equanimous motivation than his criticism of Von Koren. Confused feelings of guilt still lie behind his behavior toward her, and getting rid of such feelings as the primary motivation of action is slowly revealing itself as the key to ethical action according to Chekhov’s novella. Foreshadowing the condemnation of Nadyezhda Fyodorovna by Marya Konstantinovna, Laevsky’s criticism comes as a genuinely dismaying shock to her. Nadyezhda Fyodorovna’s descent has begun from lightness—which she felt during the picnic as a kind of false levity in the denial of her actual circumstances—into heaviness, which reaches its peak in the image of a fly trapped in ink and thus unable to fly. She realizes that her lightness was in fact always in some sense heaviness: “she had gone too far, had been too free and easy in her behavior, and overcome with misery, feeling herself heavy, stout, coarse and drunk” (120, italics added). To this realization Laevsky adds the news of the death of her husband. Reality thus comes crashing down on Nadyezhda Fyodorovna, who lies in the same distraught way in which she will end up after her final entrapment by her affairs that come to a climax at the party.

By the time of the party, Nadyezhda Fyodorovna’s affairs are unequivocally forced upon her by Kirilin’s threats of blackmail and Atchmianov’s demands. With the involvement of money and debts in even her initial affair with Atchmianov, it is clear that Nadyezhda Fyodorovna is slipping into a sexual slavery that would be blamed on her alone by the likes of society but that Chekhov is showing to be much more widely shared. The common social view is parodied in the character of Marya Konstantinovna, whose absolute exculpation of Laevsky from any blame is clearly not in line with the trajectory of the narrative, whose purpose is partly to bring Laevsky to admit his own responsibility (144). Nadyezhda Fyodorovna’s trajectory continues to parallel Laevsky’s, with her increasingly delirious focus being the money that she owes and has been forced to trade sexual favors for, and Laevsky’s being the date of his planned escape.

Their repeated phrases, “first a hundred, then a hundred more,” and “Friday!”, allude to a classic Russian short story from earlier in the 19th century, Alexander Pushkin’s “The Queen of Spades,” about the descent from fantasy into delirium. The main character of this story goes mad with the fantasy of winning a card game, endlessly repeating the order of the suits. The connection to Pushkin’s story shows the extent to which fantasy has overtaken Chekhov’s characters in their efforts to escape their own actions and indeed their own selves. Solutions like numbers and days—or for that matter place—are traded for the harder work of self-confrontation that persists despite this kind of external problem-solving (48).

The conversation about debts also links Nadyezhda Fyodorovna and Laevsky, with Nadyezhda Fyodorovna’s situation making her more vulnerable to sexual predation, and Laevsky’s entangling him with Von Koren. Continuing the idea that these antithetical characters rely on one another, and further suggesting the fact that Samoylenko was only ever an intermediary between them, the condition of the loan is a pivotal moment for Laevsky. Laevsky correctly senses Von Koren’s reasoning behind the condition, and feels himself caught out in the act of lying before he himself could admit to lying.

The condition is in line with Von Koren’s belief that people must be forced to do the right thing, although, as the deacon suggests, it is unclear who determines right and wrong. Von Koren answers, “knowledge and evidence”—mistakes are made, but “it’s no use to be afraid of getting your feet wet when you are threatened with the deluge!” (216). Regardless, force is necessary, according to Von Koren, as is the struggle for life that he refers to in a foreshadowing of his duel with Laevsky. According to Von Koren, this will be a struggle that determines who is stronger and therefore who will better serve the species. The absurd humor of Von Koren’s comments about moles fastidiously working together only in order to fight one another is lost on Von Koren, but not the deacon, who provides the humorous perspective that is central to even the most philosophically serious of Chekhov’s works.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text