27 pages • 54 minutes read
Oscar WildeA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The central argument of Wilde’s essay is that lying is necessary to create true art. Wilde relies on the provocative nature of the idea that lying is beneficial and even necessary both to capture readers’ attention and to emphasize his point. Per the aestheticist school of thought, beauty and imagination are held to be the fundamental components of creation, as opposed to artwork that draws from and aims to reproduce real life. Illustrating this, Vivian comments that “those who do not love Beauty more than Truth never know the inmost shrine of Art” (16). In other words, artists and writers who prioritize telling the truth or trying to accurately represent their subjects based on reality will never succeed in creating great art.
Wilde’s argument is steeped in the aestheticist belief that reality is not and cannot be beautiful, whereas art has beauty as its principal objective. According to this ideology, “lying,” or inventing a work that is artistically beautiful by following artistic conventions is the only way to make worthwhile, timeless art. By centering his essay around lying in art, Wilde hints at the link between art and artifice, which share the same root in Latin. Artifice, or falseness (i.e., lying), is thus implied to be an inherent component of art. Vivian asserts that “Lying and poetry are arts—arts, as Plato saw, not unconnected with each other” (3) because both require practice, commitment, and more care than the “casual inspiration of the moment” (3). In fact, Wilde celebrates poets as being among the least affected by what he perceives to be the modern preoccupation with the truth, claiming they are universally understood to be unreliable(9).
The valorization of art based on lying centers on the belief that realist notions promoting the “return to Life and Nature” are misguided and lead to bad art. Wilde also explains that it is in fact the unpleasantness of “uncomfortable Nature” that led to the invention of architecture—another art form—so that people could have everything “fashioned for our use and our pleasure” (1). Life, on the other hand, is variously described as “dull” (9), “depressing” (6), “sordid” (15), and “tedious” (15). Hence, recreating life is undesirable because life is not beautiful; it requires the artificiality of the artist to create the beautiful. Lying, then, creates beauty.
One of Vivian’s key tenets of his “new aesthetics” (16) is that “Life imitates Art far more than Art imitates Life” (17); that is, art is an inventive force, and the way people perceive life and themselves is based on artistic conventions. As such, art creates the images that we model ourselves and our perceptions on.
Wilde supplies a number of examples to illustrate that art is an inventive force, as well as counterexamples of pieces that are imitative and therefore cannot achieve the same sophistication or beauty. As noted, Wilde is critical of the fixation on nature as a subject and source of inspiration, and he describes work inspired by nature as “old fashioned, antiquated, and out-of-touch” (6). This is because nature is “the collection of phenomena external to man,” and therefore people bring meaning to nature where there arguably is none (6). He uses the poetry of William Wordsworth to note how the poet’s work based on nature is derivative, unlike his work based on artistic convention and imagination.
The inventive nature of art is related to Wilde’s defense of lying because it is by creating what does not exist that art attains true beauty. Art is a means of imposing perfection on an imperfect world. Indeed, Wilde writes that “Art […] is not to be judged by any external standard of resemblance. She is a veil, rather than a mirror” (9). Through style and imagination, art can create visions of a reality that go beyond the limits of what we actually experience. The creation of such visions or “types” then trains people to recognize or “copy” these types in their own lives. Wilde lists a range of examples in art and literature that incited trends in people’s behaviors and perceptions of the world, ranging from “the pessimism that characterises modern thought” that “Hamlet invented” (10) to a story of a friend named Mr. Hyde who inadvertently recreated the opening of the famous 19th-century novel Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.
One of the writers Wilde commends for his vision and characterization is Balzac, a 19th-century French writer. Balzac is often considered a prominent representative of the realist movement, and Wilde responds to this idea directly to explain his stance defending Balzac and his work as an inventive force rather than simple imitation. Cyril asks Vivian whether Balzac and another important figure of the Realism movement, George Meredith, are realists. Vivian answers by enumerating the qualities of the writers’ works that distinguish them from the pitfalls of realism and its reliance on imitation, asserting, “The difference between such a book as M. Zola’s L’Assommoir and Balzac’s Illusions Perdues is the difference between unimaginative realism and imaginative reality” (5). For Wilde, this is one of art’s gifts to people because it encourages them to seek the beauty found in art within their own lives.
Another core tenet of the Aestheticism movement is that art should be independent of any moral, political, social, economic, or other external influences or motivations: in other words, art for art’s sake. Art’s separation from these matters was key to the aestheticist view that art is not a mirror of life but rather innovative and amoral, with its only obligation being to create beauty.
Wilde views artistic efforts that endeavor to address aspects of real life as “vulgar” and counter to the objective of creating beauty. He uses the example of contemporary writer Charles Reade to lament the outcome of artists who attempt to use art for purposes other than beauty, maintaining that Reade lived his life “in a foolish attempt to be modern” (6). Wilde, through Vivian, claims that to see a capable artist spending their life focusing on the day-to-day is wasteful (6).
To Wilde, the flaw in this approach is that the artist mistakes reality as having the possibility to be beautiful, when in fact beauty is the result of artistic invention. It is because art only has itself to refer and respond to that it can transcend the banality and brutality of everyday life. He describes this misconception as common, stating, “The public imagine that […] Art should be interested in them also, and should take them as her subject-matter. But the mere fact that they are interested in these things makes them unsuitable subjects for Art” (5). Art is meant to go beyond the everyday, exist beyond the limits of reality, and create a vision of what the world could and should be.
Indeed, not only does Wilde assert that mixing politics, morality, and other aspects of real life into art results in bad art, but he even goes so far as to argue that doing so is wrong. In his critique of one of Émile Zola’s novels, Wilde remarks that even though Zola is “perfectly truthful, and describes things exactly as they happen” (4), Zola’s “work is entirely wrong from beginning to end, and wrong not on the ground of morals, but on the ground of art” (4). This is because Zola aims to express life rather than to create art, and Wilde believes that these are not only two separate aims, but two incompatible aims. Per aestheticist principles, art is independent of external influence. Accordingly, art must exist outside of time and reality. Furthermore, linking to the notion of Art as an Inventive Force, while art may come to define a time, the reverse—that a time defines the art—should never apply. For Wilde, the only true art is the art that is coherent within itself and self-referential.
By Oscar Wilde