37 pages • 1 hour read
Helmut Walser SmithA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
One of the striking aspects of the Konitz story is the estrangement between the Christian and Jewish communities, despite them living and working in close proximity to each other. Smith delves into this issue in Chapter 2, where he explains the social order in Konitz in terms of a plot or narrative with “heroes” and “villains.” Even prior to Winter’s murder, in Konitz, Jews and Christians rarely associate with each other, marriage between them is strongly disapproved, and there is a language barrier. Christian townspeople treat their Jewish neighbors as if they are members of an “alien” species, spouting deeply prejudiced views: “[T]hey are a civilization apart, and […] one questions their humanity” (88). The system of othering and dehumanizing an entire group of people makes it easy to justify atrocity and prejudice. Moreover, this community divide is not just religious but social: “Although both men [Hoffmann and Lewy] are butchers and neighbors, Hoffmann belongs to the respectable middle class […]. Lewy, by contrast, [belongs] to a ‘lowly community’ for whom ‘nothing is sacrosanct’” (87). Lewy’s lower class status in addition to his Jewish identity make it even easier for both the lower-class and middle-class Christians to view him and others in the Jewish community as animalistic “others.”
The stories told by the Christians about the Jews “imply an allegory about community, about the lines people draw between themselves and their neighbors” (83). Christian and Jewish visions of reality were therefore disparate, making it easier for the advantaged group to commit violence against the less advantaged group. The idea of neighbors being strangers leading to violence is manifested most shockingly in the case of the 1939 massacre at Jedwabne, in which the Polish members of the town, at the instigation of the occupying Nazis, turned against their Jewish neighbors and killed them. This estrangement happens in spite of the German Jews’ best efforts to assimilate into their country. For example, at the turn of the century, in the wake of polarization between Germans and Polish people in Prussia, German Jews become particularly insistent about asserting their Germanness. Yet despite this, they are singled out by the Nazi Party as a scapegoat for German societal ills, illustrating the atrocity inherent in the system of othering.
Smith asserts that people, when acting as a group on behalf of a certain cause, construct a collective narrative to explain events. This is a story or plotline composed of things that are known, rumored, or imagined. Smith uses this model to explain why so many people turned against the Jewish community in the Konitz case. The Christian townspeople construct a storyline with heroes and villains, rooted in stereotypes and social themes going back centuries. Like the plot of a novel, the collective narrative demarcates lines and social boundaries, “defining who belongs and who not” (87). The Jews, and in particular Adolph Lewy, are defined as the villains of the tale, and the Christians as the heroes. Smith postulates that the Christian townspeople imagined certain events to have occurred, making a mishmash of ancient stereotypes and half-remembered events. As time passes, they eventually came to believe the truth of their story. An example is Joseph Laskowski imagining that he felt Adolph Lewy sizing up his thighs for slaughter.
This is somewhat different from an outright lie, and Smith cautions against assuming a deliberately malicious intent in every case. People simply came to believe their own prejudiced narrative. In some cases, the narratives may serve the function of re-balancing the social order. This is true in cases where Christian servants invent fantastic tales about their Jewish employers, involving such things as drawing blood or sexual assault.
Related to the other themes in novel, blood is a powerful substance and symbol, marking communities, ethnicity, and nationalities. For Christians, blood suggests the blood of Jesus Christ, poured out in sacrificial love for humanity, the unifying force in the Christian community. While this is a very old idea, blood in the guise of race is tied with the (at the time) new Darwinist doctrines of race and genetics. Both the religious and the racial aspects of blood are involved in the ritual murder myth. The idea of Jews consuming Christian blood is horrifying to people because it implies “mixing” of races or communities which many thought should be kept separate. It also seems to mock and distort the sacrificial act of Christ, the central belief of Christianity. In an era in which Jews were attempting to assimilate to Christian society, both in Germany and elsewhere, the ritual murder myth served as a negation of everything they were trying to achieve (84-85).
The ritual murder myth was also connected with the religious idea of the “blood libel”—the theory that the Jews as a people bear collective guilt for the crucifixion of Christ. This sense unites the religious/moral and racial senses of blood: the idea of Christ’s blood spilt for the salvation of humanity, and the blood of race and heredity.