44 pages • 1 hour read
Michael LewisA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
It’s axiomatic on Wall Street that, if you’re an investor and don’t know what you’re doing, you’ll be taken advantage of by the traders. This is especially true in the lightly policed bond market, where profit, not morality, holds sway. Within this atmosphere, subprime bonds are developed, securities doomed to fail largely because they are marketed dishonestly.
High-quality mortgage bonds have been a hit since the mid-1980s, and traders begin to sell lower-quality subprime bonds as well. The profits are so huge that the investment banks buy up as many mortgages as the home-loan industry can write. This, along with a government policy that encourages poorer citizens to take out second mortgages as their home values rise, gives everyone involved carte blanche to package as many such mortgages as possible. The result is a race to the bottom, to the point where people with bad credit ratings are receiving mortgages with no credit check and no down payment.
Bonds that contain these faulty mortgages are harder to sell, so Wall Street repackages the worst of them into a new type of bond that makes risky mortgages look better than they are. This is in keeping with the culture of deceit surrounding the bond business. The new bonds are sent to rating agencies that are paid by the banks to certify the securities; the agencies have an incentive to please these customers—their own is a culture of dull bureaucratic incompetence combined with a desire to please—so they look over the new bonds, misunderstand them, look the other way, and give them the highest rating.
Traders now sell these and related products to unsuspecting investors but don’t fully explain the complexities even to their bosses, who assume that the bonds’ rating is legitimate. Before long, even the traders begin to believe their own malarkey, forgetting that the AAA certification is basically an elaborate forgery.
Mortgage bonds have never failed in the twenty years they have existed since the mid-1980s, and everyone casually assumes this will always be true. Sales people certainly don’t want to entertain doubts in front of their customers; when signs of trouble appear, accompanied by a few sorehead investors who carp about the dangers, the Wall Street sales force brushes these concerns aside.
In a strange twist of logic, bond sellers deliberately create a risky bond that appears to be high-quality, which fools the regulators, who give the bonds high ratings. This, in turn, convinces the sellers that they really are high-quality. Nearly everyone, from CEOs on down, persists in believing this fantasy right up to the day the market crashes.
The chief lesson of the subprime mortgage crisis is that perfectly sane professionals, goaded by a touch of larceny and a large dose of wishful thinking, can believe with virtually no reservations a dangerous myth until it nearly destroys their industry. This kind of insanity is difficult, if not impossible, to prevent, since the incentives of the people involved point them away from the truth, and naysayers are quickly silenced.
Investing is a hard game; it involves predicting the future, which is chancy in any endeavor. With so many smart players in the game, it’s tough to get an advantage. Nonetheless, a small collection of investors come to believe, against overwhelming Wall Street opinion, that subprime mortgage bonds will fail in large numbers sometime in 2007. It develops that the doubters are right, while those who are certain turn out to be wrong.
Cautiously, these few groups—FrontPoint Partners, headed by Steve Eisner; Scion Capital’s Michael Burry; Cornwall Capital’s Jamie Mai and Charley Ledley; and a handful of lone investors, including Greg Lippmann—perform extensive research and conduct many interviews to determine if they are on the right track. It’s a lonely quest since they can find almost no one who agrees with them.
Burry’s investor group tires of his obsession with subprime bonds and threatens to sue him if he doesn’t release their funds. Even after he is proven right, his investors continue to criticize him. The experience ruins what little faith in humanity Burry has left; in the end, he collects his millions, closes the fund, and retires from investing.
Mai and Ledley cannot escape their nervous fear that shorting the bond market will prove correct but fail anyway because the banks that have accepted their bets become insolvent from the same market forces that give the Cornwall team their win.
Eisner and Lippmann collar anyone who will listen to their sky-is-falling story and manage mainly to alienate their audiences. The crash makes them rich, but the destruction it wreaks overcomes Eisner, who is humbled by the vastness of the forces at play. This tragedy transforms him from an angry prophet of doom to a quieter and nicer person.
Even the author, Michael Lewis, must suffer from winner’s guilt when, after the crash, he meets with his old Wall Street boss, John Gutfreund, whose leadership Lewis criticizes in his first book, Liar’s Poker. Gutfreund agrees with Lewis’s assessment of the 2008 bond disaster, then says, “Your fucking book destroyed my career and it made yours” (264).
One of the disturbing lessons of the 2008 financial crash is that the largest investment firms and their leaders may be exempt from the consequences of their actions. The government believes it cannot sit idly by while most of the big investment banks go under, and the feds step in with a trillion dollars to sop up the worst of the losses. This arguably saves the American economy, and the world, from a debacle vastly worse than the one it goes through, but the rescue also insulates the main culprits from a painful reckoning.
Most of the banks regroup and thrive, and many of the top executives continue their prosperous careers. It’s true that much of the initial damage is done to the accounts of giant institutional investors, including domestic and foreign banks, along with insurance companies. The effects also are keenly felt by ordinary citizens, many of whom lose their investments, their jobs, or their homes as a result of the shenanigans in the bond market.
The economy recovers after a few years, and all seems well once again, but the price has been paid largely by the innocent. Whether the lessons have made a lasting impression on Wall Street remains to be seen. Always there will be new opportunities for stock and bond traders to make a killing, and always there will be a chance that those plans go terribly awry.
By Michael Lewis