58 pages • 1 hour read
D. H. LawrenceA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Paul is not yet born at the beginning of Sons and Lovers, but he gradually emerges as the novel’s protagonist. He is the son of Walter and Gertrude; Paul hates Walter, but his love for his mother defines the novel. From a young age, Paul is quiet and introspective. This emotional fragility encapsulates his relationship with his parents. While Paul hates his father and his father’s friends, who he views as uncouth and common, he bides himself to his mother’s affection. Gertrude pities her quiet son and offers him enough adoration to make up for the affection that his hated father cannot provide. She protects him, showers him with affection, and hopes that he will be able to grow up to break free from the constraints of the poverty into which he was born. Paul’s introspective qualities manifest in his skills as an artist. Paul feels an Immediacy of Emotion in the world around him, viewing every sunset and flower as an expression of his bond with the natural world. He conveys this emotional attachment in his painting, which gradually becomes more successful than he could ever have imagined. Paul is richly rewarded for his emotional expression, to the point where his emotionally withdrawn father is forced to acknowledge the financial benefits of his son’s artistic endeavors. Paul’s painting is an indication of how he is at war with the world into which he was born, while also providing him with an artistic and financially rewarding means of expressing his extreme emotions.
Paul loves his mother more than anyone else. She is the first person to offer him unconditional love and the only person to whom he can promise the same in return. Their relationship goes beyond the closeness expected of most mother-and-son relationships. Even Walter comments ironically on this so-called “mischief” when he returns from his bar to find his son and his wife stroking each other’s hair (198). In many ways, Paul and his mother act like lovers. They share intimate details about their lives, and they both dream of a future in which they are together. They share a bed, and their physical contact seems very intimate. In this way, their relationship adheres to the Freudian theory of the Oedipus complex, which posits that a child has an innate sexual desire for the parent of the opposite sex and seeks to displace their other parent. Paul’s affection for his mother occasionally broaches on the sexual, though they never consummate their relationship in such a manner. In a very real sense, however, Paul displaces his father as the leading male figure in the house. He becomes the primary earner and the primary administrator for the household, taking care of everything while his father drinks away his meager wages.
Paul’s relationships fail because Miriam and Clara ultimately cannot offer him the same kind of love that he receives from his mother, so they cannot replace her in his life. Even after her death, her presence looms large in his mind. Paul accelerates his mother’s death, euthanizing her to end her suffering. However, his suffering does not end with her death. He ends his relationship with Clara, who returns to her estranged husband, and he agrees with Miriam that any marriage—as inevitable as it seems—will simply make them both miserable. Paul does not find happiness in the wake of his mother’s death, but in the final lines of the novel, he acknowledges a future in which he is liberated and free to find his own way in the world.
Gertrude competes with her son Paul for the mantle of the novel’s protagonist. Her perspective is favored in many of the earlier chapters in Sons and Lovers, but the death of her son William signifies a shift in the narrative perspective that allows Paul to take over. The death of William is a defining moment in Gertrude’s life, a capstone to the repeated tragedies that she has suffered. From an early age, Gertrude was an ambitious woman. Though she grew up in a society with limited opportunities for women, she sought to improve and educate herself. She was well-read and enjoyed discussions of profound subjects. When she met Walter Morel, however, she was charmed by a man who was the complete opposite of everyone else in her life. The rough, charming, likable young Walter thrilled her. He introduced an element of excitement into her life that was enough for her to fall in love with him. Very quickly after the marriage, however, she discovered that Walter was not the man she thought him to be. Once a teetotaler, he began to drink heavily. Though he swore to her that he owned his house and furniture, Gertrude discovered that he was deeply in debt to his mother. Once she has children, however, Gertrude cannot bring herself to leave Walter. She stays to be with the children and settles into a life of quiet resentment directed toward her husband, punctuated only by brief reunions that result in further pregnancies.
Each pregnancy is a moral conundrum for Gertrude. She hates her abusive husband and his dependency on alcohol, and so she fears the prospect of bringing a child into such a household. She is utterly devoted to William, as he is to her, and this bond of affection becomes her justification for having more children. With each child, the moral quandary diminishes. Each child becomes an opportunity for Gertrude to experience the love and ambition that she feels has been denied to her by Walter. The children become her chance to correct her life, even if they must deal with Walter at the same time. Gertrude concludes that she is justified in bringing children into a broken home because her extreme affection will make up for the deficit of love that they experience from their father. At first, William is the primary focus of Gertrude’s love. William is the prototype for a type of devoted love that she later replicates and exceeds with Paul. William eventually grows up, and he is distracted from his mother’s love by other women and the lure of London. Gertrude resents William’s girlfriend and dislikes his absence from the family home. Her resentment, she believes, is justified when William falls sick and spends days alone in a room with no one to care for him. William dies, and, with him, a small part of Gertrude dies as well. She is only revived when Paul, suffering from a similar sickness, survives. She then finds a new purpose in her life by devoting herself to Paul as she once did to William.
As Paul matures, his relationship with Miriam makes Gertrude worry that he is following a similar path to William. She ruthlessly polices his affections, manipulating his emotions so that he feels that he can never truly devote himself to another woman while his mother is still alive. Gertrude is jealous that anyone else should enjoy Paul’s affection; the intensity of her love changes Paul’s understanding of what love should be, so neither the physical nor the psychological love he receives from Clara or Miriam can ever measure up to that offered by his mother. Gertrude casts a long shadow over Paul’s life and, in doing so, creates a boundary between Paul and the rest of the world. She traps him inside her affections, keeping them to herself. Only with her passing is Paul able to comprehend a life beyond the love of his mother.
Miriam is a local girl. She grows up on a farm near the Morel house, suffering under the cruel regime of her bullying older brothers. Paul meets Miriam when they are both teenagers, and, very quickly, a bond develops between them. Miriam is introduced to the novel through her literary tastes. She is well-read enough that she casts herself in the role of the heroine in the story of her life. This romantic view of the world alludes to Miriam’s tendency toward emotional intensity, showing a likeness to Paul when it comes to The Immediacy of Emotion. When she experiences anything, she does so in an intense manner. Whether cupping a flower in her hand or spending time with Paul, she feels a need to experience the strongest possible version of any emotion. This love of intense but abstract emotion contrasts with Miriam’s comparative dislike of physical sensations. To Miriam, love is an abstract idea that can be debated back and forth. When she and Paul begin to fall in love, she resists his desire to physically love her because this form of love is alien to her. Instead, she loves him in an intellectual and intense manner, causing him to eventually resent the manner of her love because he feels as though she is trying to own him. To Miriam, this physical love is a sacrifice, an act in which she loses a part of herself to gain more of Paul’s intellectual self.
The deep intellectual connection between Miriam and Paul transcends their various tragedies and travails. They do have a physical relationship, but, as Miriam foresaw, their relationship ends soon after. Miriam remains in Paul’s life; he can never quite abandon her because she has seen into his soul unlike anyone else, even his mother. The connection between the pair endures because Miriam believes that she is the only person who comprehends the true, emotional version of Paul. She knows that this will bring him back to her. At the same time, however, her knowledge of his character means that she knows that they can never be happy together. The same intellectual intimacy that binds them together is what reveals to her that they will only make each other miserable. Rather than dooming them to a miserable marriage—like Gertrude and Walter’s—Miriam refuses his final, desperate romantic overtures. She turns down Paul’s final proposal, as she knows that they will only obliterate one another’s happiness. Ultimately, the bond between Miriam and Paul is so intense and so profound that it is not feasible. When she comes to recognize this, the refusal of his love becomes another sacrifice in which she forgoes the romantic idea of her ideal lover.
Clara is a married woman, though she is estranged from her husband, Baxter. She meets Paul through Miriam; Paul is quickly fascinated by her. Clara represents a world beyond Paul’s working-class roots. Unlike Miriam and Gertrude, Clara is not associated in Paul’s mind with the small town where he grew up. With her broken marriage and her interest in political causes, she represents a modern, urban woman, as well as a world beyond his typical social confines. Paul is intrigued by Clara as he is intrigued by the world outside the scope of his understanding. He reveals his parochial, shallow understanding of her politics in their conversations, in which he angers her by adhering to traditional ideas of masculinity without any effort to understand her association with the women’s rights movement.
In spite of her initial animosity, Clara is eventually won over by Paul. They embark on a romantic and sexual relationship, one defined by the extremities of their passion and The Immediacy of Emotion. Paul loves Clara with an immediacy and a physicality with which he can love no one else, either because Miriam resents his physical love or because he will not break social taboos with his mother. Despite the intensity of their physical relationship, the paucity of their intellectual commonalities eventually has its toll. For all his empathy, Paul never truly understands Clara. She accuses him of knowing her less than her estranged husband, an accusation that eventually leads to her reunion with Baxter. When Paul recognizes that Clara will never divorce Baxter to be with him, he gives his blessing to the married couple’s reunion. He kills their relationship to end the suffering, much as he feeds morphine to his dying mother.
By D. H. Lawrence