logo

39 pages 1 hour read

Jodi Kantor, Megan Twohey

She Said

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2019

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapter 7-EpilogueChapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 7 Summary: “There Will Be a Movement”

The day after the phone call with Weinstein, the journalists received a letter from one of his attorneys threatening them with a lawsuit if they published their findings and requesting two weeks to prepare a refutation. Weinstein’s team implied that he was the true victim and that the paper was abusing the public’s trust. The newspaper’s legal counsel drafted a response denying that the journalists were committing defamation and demanding that Weinstein’s team preserve all evidence related to the investigations, essentially one-upping their attempt to force the Times to back down.

Kantor continued to press Gwyneth Paltrow to go on record for the forthcoming article while Weinstein and his team, including the lawyer Lisa Bloom, arrived at the newspaper’s offices threatening to publicly smear his victims. The Weinstein team also began speaking to other media outlets to preemptively deny the charges. As the Times employees continued work on the article, Laura Madden contacted Kantor and agreed to go on the record—a major boon for the investigation. Weinstein’s team simultaneously began asking questions about whether the paper was going to quote Paltrow, signaling that he had something more to fear about the actor coming forward. Panicking, Weinstein sent in a statement for the article. He also confided that he was taking a leave of absence from his company, essentially acknowledging his misdeeds.

When the Times published the first article on October 5, 2017, many of the Weinstein Company’s board members resigned, still showing little to no concern for the victims. Subsequently, Paltrow said she would go on the record in a follow-up, and many other victims shared their stories of the producer’s harassment. A deluge of new accusations came forth.

Chapter 8 Summary: “The Beachside Dilemma”

After the publication of the Weinstein revelations, women from a wide variety of occupations came forth with their stories, and there was a “growing consensus that all sorts of previously tolerated practices were wrong” (182). Weinstein was in jail, awaiting trial for some of his crimes.

Some suggested that perpetrators were the true victims and “the #MeToo movement was becoming a witch hunt” (186). Others believed laws on sexual harassment needed updates, revisions, and better enforcement. Victims’ race and/or class also played a role in the treatment their cases received, and Kantor published articles on harassment of women in low-paying jobs where “little had shifted structurally” (187). For example, a property owner harassed a woman named Kim Lawson until she was forced into homelessness, and both a McDonald’s coworker and supervisor also harassed her. When she objected to a manager, he did nothing about it, and she feared retaliation if she complained further.

In August 2018, a Stanford neuroscientist named Christine Blasey Ford began quietly notifying others that Brett Kavanaugh, President Trump’s latest Supreme Court nominee, had sexually assaulted her in the 1980s. Ford was not especially politically active but was concerned about Kavanaugh’s potential appointment to the highest court in the United States. She therefore contacted her congresswoman, Anna Eshoo. Eshoo’s office instructed Ford to send a confidential letter to Senator Dianne Feinstein, a Democratic member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which would conduct hearings on Kavanaugh’s nomination. Feinstein’s office connected Ford with attorneys Debra Katz and Lisa Banks. Inspired by the Weinstein case’s outcomes, the lawyers encouraged Ford to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Yet she feared speaking publicly and waffled between wanting to act while also seeking privacy. By August’s end, Ford decided against moving forward.

Chapter 9 Summary: “I Can’t Guarantee I’ll Go to DC”

As of early September, Ford stood by her decision to remain silent, but the information about her letter to Senator Feinstein leaked to the media, and Feinstein gave the letter to the FBI. The FBI sent Ford’s letter to the Office of the President for the nominee’s background file, and Kavanaugh swiftly denied wrongdoing.

Ford consented to an interview with The Washington Post to gain control over her story. She explained that Kavanaugh had not raped her but that he had sexually assaulted her; she also provided records from therapy dating to 2012 in which she discussed the assault and resulting trauma. Critics quickly emerged, while others rallied around her as a heroic symbol of the #MeToo movement. Ford’s attorneys encouraged her to testify, but she was wary of a public, televised hearing. Meanwhile, Kavanaugh’s high school friends, whom Ford had named as witnesses, submitted written statements to the Judiciary Committee denying any knowledge of her accusations and defending Kavanaugh’s character.

By September 24, the Judiciary Committee announced that they would vote on Kavanaugh’s confirmation in the coming week. Time was of the essence; Ford’s lawyers continued to encourage her public testimony. The authors note, “[I]t was clear Ford was never going to give one firm and final yes to testifying in an open hearing. Her ambivalence was paralyzing” (224). Yet Ford came to DC, accompanied by several friends for support, and prepared for public testimony with her attorneys at the Watergate Hotel. Kantor arrived at the hotel to observe the preparations and the hearing; she found a bustling room protected by security guards due to threats leveled at Ford, and an abundance of flowers and gifts sent by supporters. When Ford testified, she was measured, calm, and precise in her responses, making her a credible and convincing source. Kavanaugh spoke following her testimony and unleashed a vitriolic attack on the accusations against him, claiming he was the victim of a left-wing conspiracy to tank his nomination and leading Republican senators on the Committee to claim the whole thing was a farce and “disgrace” (237).

Despite Ford’s powerful testimony, the Senate Judiciary Committee chose to advance Kavanaugh’s nomination, and the Senate eventually confirmed him in October 2018. Yet the #MeToo movement continued, gaining strength, with Kim Lawson and other McDonald’s employees staging a national walkout over the corporation’s poor handling of sexual harassment. The New York Times asked readers if they felt remorse for how they had treated women and received hundreds of responses from men who had committed egregious acts ranging from rape to groping, many of them apologizing for their actions.

Epilogue Summary: “The Gathering”

In early 2019, Kantor and Twohey convened many of the women they interviewed over the course of the Weinstein investigation and beyond for a group discussion and interview. Women from across the US and abroad came to Gwyneth Paltrow’s home in California, where they could meet in a private and supportive environment. Weinstein accusers Laura Madden and Zelda Perkins came from the UK. Ashley Judd joined the group, and McDonald’s labor organizer Kim Lawson made the trip. Rachel Crooks, whom Megan had interviewed several years earlier about having been harassed and forcibly kissed by Donald Trump, participated, as did Christine Blasey Ford.

Women who were once terrified of talking about their experiences were now quite vocal. Perkins, for instance, had broken her settlement agreement. When Weinstein’s legal team failed to pursue her, she went on to speak out against settlements in the British media and before Parliament.

There were noticeable differences between the women, which Paltrow’s affluent home symbolized. Many of the women were solidly middle to upper-middle class, while Kim Lawson had once been homeless. Rowena Chiu pointed out that stereotypes of Asian Americans as the silent “model minority” fed into her hesitancy to speak up (252).

Collectively, the participants wanted their media exposure to end. They acknowledged that “[T]hey had all been part of a genuine realignment, but it was so incomplete” (256), and they questioned how much more they wanted to do. Some, including Ford, worried about their identities being forever linked to their assaults. Yet all the women realized that nothing would change if victims did not share their accounts. A few weeks after the gathering, Rowena Chiu, the only participant who had not yet spoken openly about Weinstein’s harassment, decided to share her story with the public.

Chapter 7-Epilogue Analysis

In the book’s final third the Weinstein investigation reaches its conclusion, Kantor and Twohey publish their findings, and the authors turn their attention to the broader impact of Weinstein’s exposure and downfall. In doing so, they center women’s agency. Victims felt emboldened to come forward with their stories as part of the rapidly growing feminist #MeToo movement. The authors contextualize their own investigation within this broader moment for victims of assault and harassment, which roughly spanned 2017 to 2018. Indeed, they end the main text with Christine Blasey Ford’s story, which, in marked contrast to the Weinstein case, did not end in justice for the victim.

The narrative offers Ford’s fears about coming forward as a lens through which readers can better understand the actions of other victims; Ford’s internal struggle sheds light on the reasons why some victims may choose to remain silent, as well as on the way that society punishes victims for daring to speak out. At the book’s conclusion, Ford is in the process of healing from her experience and rebuilding her life. The trauma of her assault, of having to relive that trauma on national television in front of hostile senators, and of threats to her life and family are all powerful testaments to why many victims never come forward.

Through their retelling of the gathering of survivors at Gwyneth Paltrow’s home, the authors raise important questions about when, how, and to whom victims should share their stories. They also highlight the related issue of how race and class factor into whether victims come forward or get justice. Kim Lawson and Rowena Chiu stand out as examples of the way that racism and class discrimination intersect with misogyny to play into cultures of silence, injustice, and systemic abuse. This section of the book is necessarily open-ended, as many women still struggle to secure justice for what they’ve experienced. However, Rowena Chiu’s decision to finally share her story reminds the reader of what is possible, tacitly encouraging other victims to come forward and activist-minded readers to begin or continue working to dismantle systems of oppression.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text