48 pages • 1 hour read
Jonathan KozolA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The first major theme of Savage Inequalities is the link between inequality and segregation. One of the important tasks of Kozol's argument is to establish that the inequalities manifest in American education are connected to practices of segregation, in both the past and the present. Supplemental to this argument is Kozol’s position that these practices of segregation echo across generations, and predicate future inequality. Kozol's belief is that continuing racial prejudice and separatism, although mostly tacit, help keep these divisions active. These divisions, in turn, spoil opportunity for future generations.
Kozol's concept of "inequality" can be summarized as an "equality of opportunity"—that is, the maintenance of a system whereby all people have the ability to compete academically and economically, and forge their own destinies. In Kozol's view, the current system does not guarantee appropriate materials, resources, and attention to students of lower socioeconomic classes, and students of color.
While most of Kozol's viewpoints here are commonly held, he goes further in his insistence of methods of reform. Kozol is a redistributionist; he supports policies that direct funds and materials from wealthier, higher-performing districts to poorer, lower-performing ones. His rationale is that the latter has much more unfair challenges and obstacles; this imbalance needs to be rectified if progress is to be made. In essence, the equality that Kozol advances would give more to those districts that are falling behind and in need of repair. Also, Kozol supports forced desegregation—known colloquially as "bussing"—a controversial policy. Central to his justification for these policies is Kozol's belief that educational inequalities are not merely the result of chance or natural factors but the effect of long-lasting policies of economic isolation and racial segregation. Kozol argues that these injustices require dramatic steps.
In effect, Kozol argues that the injustice of segregation morally obliges American citizens to spend extra to undo its effects, and make restitution to those affected. The latter part of this argument is perhaps the most controversial of Kozol's claims, yet it is an integral premise. To understand this premise however, we must adjust our concept of what "segregation" means. For Kozol, segregation is not limited to a single, deliberate act by an individual or entity, but the sum of a series of long-term processes that divert away resources and create negative obstacles for poorer communities of color. Repeated examples of these circumstances Kozol cites in Savage Inequalities include the departure of industry, the use of these communities as chemical dumping grounds, refusal to rent or sell to minorities in outlying districts, aggressive policing, and the use of tax breaks and alternative funding structures for wealthier schools. In none of these policies is the government directly responsible for any open discrimination; however, the sum of these effects harms poor communities of color. Kozol believes it is the responsibility of American citizens and their government to correct these issues, and make sacrifices in order to do so.
For Kozol, this is ultimately a moral issue. Throughout the book, Kozol makes the claim that the system of segregation active today persists not so much in that it requires its proponents to be overtly racist or even prejudiced, but can sustain itself merely from collective indifference toward the plight of others. Whereas practices like separate drinking fountains and lunch counters make the issue visible, Kozol believes that these modern efforts of segregation are much more difficult to uproot, as they do not acknowledge themselves as such. Thus, there are two aspects to Kozol's moral issue: the honesty to recognize the harm being done, and the courage to rectify it.
Another major theme of Savage Inequalities is the tension between "equity" and "liberty" in public education. Nearly all of the formal and informal debates on education concern the opposition of these two principles. The argument is that policies support either increasing equity in education reform or increasing its opposite, “liberty.” Kozol believes that this argument is wrong. Specifically, he argues that the rhetoric of this position—that is, the way in which these ideas are framed—is incorrect, and even dishonest. In essence, Kozol argues that this framing produces a false dilemma, which ignores the real process and history by which segregation in schools continues. Throughout Savage Inequalities, Kozol's rebuttals to conservative arguments on school reform attempt to illustrate this false dilemma.
The argument for liberty claims that the families and communities should be allowed to exercise choice on how their schools are funded, and where their children can go to schools. Critical to this argument is the idea that education is a competitive enterprise. However, implicit to this argument is that the competition takes place both inside and outside the classroom. Programs that force students across socioeconomic lines to go to school together, as well as programs that divert funds to struggling schools, remove one's liberty to achieve excellence. Though the unfairness in the school system is regrettable, taking away parents' and community's ability to maximize their own potential would be even worse. The fear of this "leveling" is that it threatens not only to degrade the ability to compete globally but invests government with the ability to micromanage local problems, over the objections of local authorities.
Kozol's counterargument is that the definition of liberty set forth by the proponents of segregated, unequal schools is false. Notably, Kozol argues that the liberty to do a thing is meaningless without the ability for all groups to do that same thing—a capacity he believes is statistically diminished by the current system of inequality. Local authorities, Kozol argues, are not empowered at all, but instead forced to follow the guidelines of the states. This is in line with the plaintiff's opinion from Rodriguez, which argues that to deprive children of an education degrades their ability to exercise other rights. Although Rodriguez’s case doesn't accuse the school districts of racism directly, Kozol advances this view that the de facto segregation of schools has a more sinister effect: to designate individuals, groups, and entire communities as unfit to participate in larger society.
A frequent trope of Savage Inequalities finds Kozol at a different school district, describing, first, the surrounding community. Kozol offers the respective areas’ histories and socioeconomic patterns, and physical characteristics—natural and manmade. These descriptions do more than merely establish settings for action. Throughout Savage Inequalities, Kozol spends a lot of time and effort investigating the link between the environments of segregated schools and the mindset of those living and working there. His argument is that there is no dividing line between the conditions of an environment and the collective psyche of a city’s denizens; the environment affects those who live there, and vice-versa. Kozol's argument runs counter to the argument that a place’s "values"—not environment—determine the success or failure of a school district. The broader, typically implicit argument made from this point is that the culture of poorer communities of color is simply incompatible with educational success, and cannot be fixed with additional resources. Kozol’s view of the interconnectedness of learning and environment directly challenges this view.
In his discussion of East St. Louis, Kozol pays particular attention to the toxins and sewage that have seeped into playgrounds, boulevards, and schools. Kozol makes a connection between the literal poisons that harm these students' bodies, and a figurative poison that affects their minds and habits. In Camden, Kozol highlights how students' consciousness of this disparity reinforces the idea that they are worth less than other, more affluent citizens. Kozol argues that the culture of a place cannot be separated from its specific history, and the real-life circumstances affecting it in the present. However, to insist on a generic vision of "inner-city culture" or "black culture" that skirts these realities is not merely prejudiced or racist, but, as Kozol argues, has a subtle, more destructive object. Specifically, Kozol believes that impositions of monolithic culture on impoverished, segregated communities is a rhetorical ploy used to justify contempt and inaction, to convince oneself and one's community that there is no real responsibility to correct these inequities. This accusation is the argumentative crux of Savage Inequalities, the paradoxical statement that segregation persists, in part, due to our stubborn refusal to acknowledge our collective role in sustaining its existence.
By Jonathan Kozol