logo

44 pages 1 hour read

Miguel de Unamuno

Saint Emmanuel the Good, Martyr

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1930

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Tragedy of Consciousness

The novel suggests that enlightenment and consciousness can be a burden rather than a liberating force, leading to despair and a profound sense of loss. It highlights a tragic irony in which the pursuit of knowledge could lead to the loss of comforting illusions that bring meaning and happiness to life.

This idea underpins Don Manuel’s internal conflict between faith and doubt and his efforts to balance his public duty with personal disbelief. Don Manuel suggests that awareness often exacerbates suffering, even in the case of relatively mundane, worldly concerns: “[Envy] is nurtured by those who are bent on believing themselves envied, and persecutions more often come from a persecution complex than from any persecutor” (59). This insight reflects his belief that knowing the full extent of one’s misfortune can inflict greater pain than the initial troubles. This concept illustrates how enlightenment can lead to increased despair rather than liberation or comfort. Don Manuel’s decision to conceal his existential doubts from the community is motivated by this understanding; he aims to shield his parishioners from the additional burdens that enlightenment might bring. As the story progresses, Angela’s journey from innocence to doubt is triggered by her father’s books, but her existential doubts deepen when she learns of Don Manuel’s disbelief. This mirrors the priest’s own dilemma but also underscoring his commitment to preserving the happiness of the community: Don Manuel’s tears in response to Angela’s doubts reveal his guilt and sadness over passing his existential burden onto her.

Don Manuel’s doubts center particularly on the existence of an afterlife, a belief that, the novel suggests, mitigates the existential dread associated with consciousness of one’s mortality. This sentiment is encapsulated in Don Manuel’s remark that “[Religion] consoles them for having had to be born in order to die” (81), Death hangs over his own head constantly, however, which is symbolized by him sleeping next to the wooden planks that will make his casket decades in the future: “After cutting six planks from [the matriarchal walnut tree], which he kept at the foot of his bed, he chopped the rest into firewood to warm the poor” (61). Despite his efforts to give his life meaning by serving others, this imagery conveys his ongoing battle with despair.

More broadly, the novel suggests that enlightenment might ultimately lead to doubt rather than certainty. Unamuno mentions this in the Prologue, alluding to parallels to Don Manuel and Don Quixote: “It would be the most complete joke on the world if someone who had expressed the deepest truth were to have been not a dreamer but a doubter” (46). Instead of the fulfillment one might expect, the search for deep truths often results in questioning and skepticism, challenging the notion that enlightenment brings peace or happiness. This paradox underscores the narrative’s exploration of how the pursuit of knowledge can strip away the innocence and simplicity that contribute to contentment, positioning doubt as the essence of enlightenment.

The Utility and Morality of Deception

Benevolent deception is predicated on the notion that deceiving others can serve a greater good, particularly when it safeguards their emotional well-being or maintains social harmony. Don Manuel embodies this philosophy, and the narrative explores the ethical implications of such deception, positioning it as a protective measure against the potential harms of unvarnished reality. Don Manuel’s application of this philosophy reveals a paradox: Lying, typically condemned, becomes a vehicle for moral good when it aims to shield the community from despair or discord.

Don Manuel’s strategic use of deception benefits the village’s spiritual health. He rationalizes that “It’s better for them to believe everything, even things that contradict one another, than not to believe anything” (87). This perspective emphasizes the importance of faith as a unifying and comforting force within the community, regardless of the contradictions inherent in the beliefs encouraged: The collective belief system, even if built on deception, is vital for maintaining social cohesion and providing existential solace. Besides concealing his own doubts, Don Manuel bends religious doctrine for the benefit of his parishioners, pretending, for example, that it is not against Catholic practice to bury someone who died by suicide in consecrated ground. Nor is Don Manuel’s willingness to temper or conceal the truth confined to religious matters. As he explains when asked to intervene in a judicial matter, “I don’t drag out of any man a truth that may send him to his death. That’s between him and God….Human justice is not my business” (57). This stance highlights a nuanced ethical framework where the preservation of life justifies the omission of truth.

The novel’s portrayal of Don Manuel’s deception intersects heavily with its portrayal of the burdens of knowledge, as Don Manuel’s action stems from his belief that existence’s harsh realities would be too distressing for most to bear. Don Manuel articulates this to Lázaro: “Truth is perhaps something terrible, something unbearable, something deadly; simple people would not be able to live with it” (79). Ironically, this perspective has biblical precedent, as Don Manuel later alludes to: “Scripture says that anyone who looks on the face of God […] will die without fail and for ever” (95). Don Manuel here intimates that direct confrontation with ultimate truths is beyond human capacity, rendering myths, illusions, and perhaps even deliberate deceptions a moral good.

Saintliness, Legacy, and Mortality

The concept of saintliness places a heavy burden on Don Manuel, shaped by the expectations of his community. He does not believe in his own saintliness, as evidenced when he denies being about to perform miracles: “I am not licensed by the lord bishop to work miracles” (55). This discrepancy between public perception and his views of himself points to the unrealistic expectations placed on him and the limitations of his human capabilities. Nevertheless, for a person who does not believe in the afterlife, public perception is important, as it is the only kind of immortality they can hope to attain.

Don Manuel prioritizes the happiness of his community above all, even in the face of personal despair. Despite his own depression, he projects an image of unwavering happiness, as captured in the observation: “Don Manuel’s imperturbable happiness was the temporal and earthly form of an infinite and eternal sadness that with heroic holiness he hid from the eyes and ears of everyone else” (65). This contrast between his public facade and private suffering becomes a form of martyrdom, as he sacrifices himself for his flock just as Jesus did: He may not believe in his own saintliness, but he becomes a kind of saint.

Moreover, Don Manuel believes that it is important for his people’s spiritual and emotional well-being that this image of him survive his death. As he does not believe in a conventional afterlife of Heaven or Hell but rather in the continuation of one’s essence through the memories of others, his own “immortality” is thus bound up in the benevolent charade he perpetuates. This is evident in Unamuno’s account of Don Manuel’s death: “Don Manuel Bueno seeks, as he goes to his death, to meld—that is, to save—his personality in that of his village” (45). Don Manuel believes that the true afterlife is in people’s memories, and he aims to leave a lasting legacy in his community.

Don Manuel’s two successors, Lázaro and Angela, aid him in this. As Lázaro approaches death, he reflects, “[T]he rest of [Don Manuel] will live on with you. Until one day even we dead will die once and for all” (101). This quote underscores the belief that a person’s impact endures through the memories of others. Angela’s role in shaping these memories—and thus the nature of Don Manuel’s “afterlife”—is two pronged, reflecting the complexity of the man himself. On the one hand, she pens a memoir to commemorate Don Manuel’s life of sacrifice. On the other, worried that the Church would misunderstand what she perceives as the true spiritual significance of that sacrifice, she conceals the memoir so as not to interfere with Don Manuel’s beatification.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text