logo

42 pages 1 hour read

Tom Stoppard

Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead

Fiction | Play | Adult | Published in 1966

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Act IIAct Summaries & Analyses

Act II Summary

Hamlet, Rosencrantz, and Guildenstern engage in a conversation that is unintelligible to the audience until Hamlet remarks, “S’blood, there is something in this more than natural, if philosophy could find it out” (49). Guildenstern notices that the Tragedians are nearby. Hamlet tells Rosencrantz and Guildenstern that they must keep up appearances and asserts that Claudius and Gertrude are mistaken about his mental state. Hamlet believes himself to be mad only when the wind blows “north north-west”; he is far more lucid when it blows south (49). Polonius enters the scene to tell Hamlet that the Tragedians have arrived, but Hamlet proceeds to mock him.

After Polonius and Hamlet exit, Guildenstern confidently declares that he and Rosencrantz “made some headway” in deducing the cause of Hamlet’s strange behavior. Rosencrantz disagrees. He says that Hamlet practically “murdered [them]” by asking 27 questions and evading all but three of their own questions (50). Rosencrantz despairingly insists that the two of them know nothing about Hamlet aside from his symptoms, which leaves Rosencrantz more confused than ever.

Rosencrantz and Guildenstern remember Hamlet’s comments regarding the direction of the wind and attempt to determine which way is south. They look in the direction of the audience and try to orient themselves based on the location of the sun and the direction in which they came. Guildenstern commands Rosencrantz to lick his toe to figure out the direction of the wind; Rosencrantz suggests that Guildenstern should lick it for him. Guildenstern is bothered by Rosencrantz’s statement, but Rosencrantz presses Guildenstern further and offers to lick his toe as a “friendly” gesture (53). Guildenstern laments that the two of them are “condemned” to be cogs in fate’s machine (53). Rosencrantz looks at the audience and shouts, “Fire!” as a way of “demonstrating the misuse of free speech” (54). He then tosses a coin but does not specify whether it lands on heads or tails. Guildenstern muses about the vagueness of memory.

Polonius, Hamlet, and the Tragedians enter. Hamlet decrees that the troupe will perform The Murder of Gonzago the next night and asks the Player to insert a speech he wrote into the play. Hamlet leaves, and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern talk to the Player, who angrily tells them that they left him and the troupe without an audience earlier. He launches into a tirade about how actors cannot possibly exist if they are not being watched, and Guildenstern claps and praises him. Both Rosencrantz and Guildenstern believe they are responsible for getting the Tragedians an audience, but the Player declares that the troupe already had an opening and have experience in playing at Elsinore.

As the Player turns to go, Guildenstern asks where he is going. The Player says that he can wander through Elsinore as he pleases since he has been there before. His sense of direction impresses Guildenstern, who admits that he and Rosencrantz are still “finding [their] feet” and have no idea what to do in their predicament (59). The Player advises them to stay sharp and act naturally. Guildenstern confesses that he does not know if he and Rosencrantz can trust the information Claudius gives them. In response, the Player remarks that everybody must operate based on their assumptions and asks the two friends what they assume. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern describe Hamlet’s emotional state and paradoxically conclude that Hamlet is “stark raving sane” (61). Once Rosencrantz and Guildenstern settle on a diagnosis for Hamlet, the Player quizzes them on the cause of Hamlet’s sane insanity. Rosencrantz cries out that he does not know the cause. The Player informs them that “the old man thinks he’s in love with his daughter” (62), but the pronouns confuse Rosencrantz, who does not understand that The Player is referring to Polonius, Hamlet, and Ophelia respectively.

After Guildenstern finally lets the Player leave, Rosencrantz asks him if he ever imagines being “actually dead” and inside a coffin. Guildenstern admits that he does not think about such things. Rosencrantz then muses on whether it would be better to be dead or to be alive but trapped in a box. Guildenstern tells him to stop, but Rosencrantz continues, stating that “eternity is a terrible thought” (64). Rosencrantz becomes paranoid about other characters coming onstage and cries out into the wings, “Keep out then! I forbid anyone to enter…that’s better” (65).

Claudius, Gertrude, Polonius, and Ophelia join Rosencrantz and Guildenstern onstage, and the five characters recite the lines from Act III, Scene 1 of Hamlet. When Gertrude asks how Hamlet received Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, they profess that Hamlet acted as a gentleman and seemed excited about the play. This answer pleases Claudius, who reveals his plan to have Hamlet confront Ophelia. After Claudius, Gertrude, Polonius, and Ophelia leave, Rosencrantz expresses anguish at constantly being accosted by the members of court as they walk on and off the stage. As Hamlet walks on stage, Rosencrantz feels the need to speak to him but loses his nerve and falters. Ophelia enters and begins talking to Hamlet. Rosencrantz once more falls into a fit of rage because the constant comings and goings remind him of “living in a public park” (68).

A queenly figure enters. Rosencrantz assumes this newly arrived character is Gertrude, but the character is actually Alfred dressed as a queen. The rest of the Tragedians join Alfred in a silent dress rehearsal, or dumbshow, narrated by the Player. The dumbshow depicts a king being poisoned by his brother and the murderous brother’s marriage to the widowed queen. Hamlet and Ophelia enter the scene, and Hamlet begins to shout hysterically at a saddened Ophelia. Hamlet exits, and Claudius and Polonius enter. Claudius weighs the possibility of sending Hamlet to England.

As the Tragedians resume their dumbshow, the Player tells Guildenstern that “events must play themselves out to aesthetic, moral, and logical conclusion” and every event must occur as it does because “it is written” (72). Guildenstern likes plays that mirror real life. In Act III of the dumbshow, the Poisoner/King decides to send his nephew away with two spies who uncannily resemble Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. Although Rosencrantz recognizes that something is familiar about these characters, he does not understand that they are supposed to represent him and Guildenstern. The Poisoner/King gives the spy characters a letter ordering the English king to kill his nephew, but the nephew switches the letter after he disembarks with the spies, and the spies are killed in his stead. The dumbshow ends with “eight corpses all told” (75).

Guildenstern criticizes the Tragedians’ ability to act out death scenes, but the Player insists that dying is “what actors do best” (75). When Guildenstern argues that death scenes in melodramatic plays are not convincing, the Player refutes his argument by saying that theatrical deaths are “the only kind [audiences] do believe” and come to expect (77).

The stage lights go out and come back on “as a sunrise” (77). Rosencrantz and Guildenstern rise up from the position the spy characters previously occupied. Claudius and Gertrude enter the scene to inform Rosencrantz and Guildenstern that Hamlet murdered Polonius. Claudius also orders them to find Hamlet and bring Polonius’s body to the chapel. Unsure how they will capture Hamlet, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern procrastinate. Hamlet comes to them but does not tell them where he hid Polonius’s body. Hamlet calls Rosencrantz a “sponge” (83) and accuses him and Guildenstern of colluding with Claudius. A guard seizes Hamlet and carries him away.

The lighting changes to indicate the characters are outdoors, and Guildenstern expresses bewilderment: “And yet it doesn’t seem enough; to have breathed such significance” (84). Relieved to have completed their task, Rosencrantz does not exhibit the same distress as Guildenstern. Guildenstern reminds him that Claudius wants them to accompany Hamlet to England. They find Hamlet talking to himself. Rosencrantz mutters, “They’ll have us hanging about till we’re dead” (85). He asks Hamlet if he is ready to go, but Hamlet orders them to start out ahead of him before resuming his inaudible monologue. Guildenstern exhibits trepidation about leaving for England, but Rosencrantz reassures him that by saying they will be free if they go.

Act II Analysis

The Player initiates the play’s pattern of self-acknowledgement in Act I by breaking the fourth wall, and that pattern continues in Act II, as both Rosencrantz and Guildenstern fret over “finding [their] feet” (59) in the plot of Hamlet. They despair over their inability to catch on and perform, since they are dropped in the middle of a drama—both literally and metaphorically—with which they are unfamiliar. Everything they know about Hamlet comes from the lines they have received from Claudius and Gertrude, and they resemble actors trying to make the most out of a few lines of script. This metaphor is strengthened when Guildenstern says, “But we don’t know what’s going on, or what to do with ourselves. We don’t know how to act” (60). Here, Stoppard compares the act of navigating existence in reality to the act of performing on a stage, as he does several times throughout the play.

Although it is the longest and arguably most eventful act in the play, Act II is marked by Rosencrantz and Guildenstern’s passivity and inaction. Many major events and conversations from Hamlet take place during this act, but they are periphery and fleeting to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, who cannot participate and must remain minor players despite being the protagonists of their own play. Even if they wanted to participate in the action, there is a mysterious block that prevents them from doing so.

At one point, Rosencrantz attempts to grab Hamlet while Hamlet delivers his famous “to be or not to be” soliloquy from Act 3, scene 1 of Hamlet, but “[Rosencrantz’s] nerve fails” (68) and he cannot go forward with his plan. His failure in this moment builds on the play’s discourse surrounding the question of free will. Rosencrantz is not free to grab Hamlet because that action does not appear in the script for Hamlet. Furthermore, the conventions of drama state that soliloquys such as the “to be or not to be” speech—arguably the most famous lines in Hamlet—should not be tainted by the interference of a minor character. Informed by this convention, the script decrees that Hamlet, the star of the play, deliver these important, critically acclaimed lines while Rosencrantz and Guildenstern stand idly by. Shakespeare’s script conjures a deterministic world that favors Hamlet over Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, chaining the two characters in passivity and once again raising the major thematic question of whether free will exists.

Rosencrantz becomes aggravated by his passivity and the claustrophobia of the stage. He is aware of his lack of freedom, and he feels as though he is “overawed” (68) by Hamlet, Claudius, Gertrude, Ophelia, and Polonius—characters who bear more significance in the plot and who confuse him by constantly coming and going. Rosencrantz makes a few frantic attempts to assert his freedom and dominance throughout Act II. First, he yells, “Fire!” at the audience—a reference the Schenck v. United States Supreme Court case, which determined the limits of free speech—to demonstrate “the misuse of free speech” (54). Then, he tells the characters waiting in the wings not to come on stage. Both of these acts fail to prove he has any freedom since the “fire” comment is still scripted despite its unexpected delivery, and his later decree does not stop any of the other characters from entering the scene.

Rosencrantz and Guildenstern’s deaths are foreshadowed multiple times throughout the play, but the most notable foreshadowing is the dumbshow of The Murder of Gonzago, the metadrama, or “play-within-a-play,” from Hamlet. In Hamlet, The Murder of Gonzago functions as a mirror for the events that precede the play’s opening and as Hamlet’s tool to gauge whether Claudius is guilty of murdering the former king. In Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, The Murder of Gonzago continues to serve its original purpose in Hamlet, but new elements have been added to the metadrama as it appears in the latter play. Two new characters—spies sent to deliver the Poisoner/King’s nephew to the King of England—are added to mirror Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. These spy characters are given the same task and wear the same clothing as Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern rise from the dead spy characters’ positions the next morning. The likelihood of their addition being merely coincidental is impossible. The Player blatantly reveals the ending of the play and Rosencrantz’s and Guildenstern’s fates to them. However, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are ultimately unable to recognize what they are watching as foreshadowing. Rosencrantz sees some familiarity in his spy counterpart, but he does not recognize him as himself because he has no sense of self.

At the end of Act II, Guildenstern expresses concern regarding their upcoming voyage to England. He dreads going on this journey since it entails uncertainty, remarking, “I like to know where I am. Even if I don’t know where I am, I like to know that. If we go there’s no knowing” (87). Here, Guildenstern acknowledges his discomfort with uncertainty. Just as he cannot bear not knowing the reasons behind the break in the law of probability at the beginning of the play, he cannot bear not knowing where he is. His anxiety about being uncertain of his geographical location symbolizes an anxiety about being uncertain of his place and role in the absurd universe. Rosencrantz comforts him and assures him that going to England is beneficial to the two of them since it allows them to be free from the tyranny of being “overawed” (68) and uncertain about what they are meant to do at Elsinore. Guildenstern weighs the options and gives into passivity, letting destiny take its course. His surrender calls the existence of free will into question since one can either interpret this surrender as predetermined by the script or an example of freely choosing not to choose.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text