60 pages • 2 hours read
Richard PowersA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Throughout Todd and Rafi’s lives, games are a recurring motif. For Todd, board games represent the lessons about competitiveness he learned from his father, who introduced him to increasingly complex games; as soon as Todd could reliably beat his father at a game, they’d move on to something more complex. Once Todd could consistently beat his father at chess, they had little place else to expand. Todd was on the precipice of expanding into business (a game his father obsessed over), but Michael died in a car crash before Todd could realize this vision. Even before his father’s death, however, Todd had passed along his love of competitive games to his friend Rafi. Like Todd’s father, Rafi’s father imbued in him a relentlessly competitive spirit. Rafi learned many games from Todd and then introduced Todd to Go, an ancient and complex strategic game. Importantly, Rafi and Todd arrive at Go under their own volition. Go is their game, which they learn to play together. It represents their friendship, even if they inherited the competitiveness that drives them from their fathers. For these two young men, Go becomes a symbol of their friendship and of how they both feel the burden of their fathers’ influence.
Just as Todd’s father taught him increasingly complex games, Todd and Rafi search for increasingly complex games with which to test themselves. Though Go remains their game of choice, they dabble in board games and other ventures. Individually, Rafi obsesses over literature while Todd obsesses over computer programming. Each treats these pursuits as they treat their games: as a framework of rules in which they must operate in pursuit of victory. They learn to turn the world around them into a game, making everything from art to computer programming an expression of the same competitiveness that drove them toward complex games. Playground emerges as the ultimate manifestation of this pursuit. It represents Rafi and Todd’s turning society into a game by creating a social media network that exists to gamify human interaction. They pattern Playground with the same systems of reward and rules that attracted them to games. Playground is a game in which the players are infinite, and the stakes are possibly existential. For these two men, however, Playground is an expression of the shared love of games that first brought them together and has shaped their lives.
Playground is the ultimate expression of what games mean to Rafi and Todd, yet it’s also the pinnacle of their relationship. The meeting in which they plan out the gamification of Playground is their last real burst of togetherness. After this, everything falls apart. Both men are stubborn, so neither can directly apologize after their argument. Since they can only really communicate through the language of games, Rafi uses this language to try to rekindle their relationship. He elevates the game, issuing a possible legal demand to Todd. Unfortunately for Todd, he doesn’t grasp that Rafi is turning the legal system into a gameboard until it’s too late. They’re playing a different game now: Since Rafi is too proud to apologize and too alienated to articulate his desire to bring Todd back into his life, he tries to start another game. That Todd places all the money he won in the lawsuit into an account for Ina shows that the money wasn’t the point. He missed his competition with Rafi and with him gone, Todd has no more games to play. His memory is failing, so he shares all his memories with an AI device to make one last game. Like the grandmasters playing against chess computers, Todd wants to develop a computer program to give him one final game against his friend. However, as Rafi feared, the game (and AI in general) can’t replace the humanity at the heart of their game. Todd’s final game symbolizes the inhumanity of AI.
The Philosophy of the Common Task by Nikolai Fyodorovich Fyodorov is an important book for Rafi. Fyodorov advocates for an idea that he labels the “common task.” According to Fyodorov, a common task is one that can unite an ailing humanity in a shared project; it’s a solution to the alienation that Fyodorov recognizes in the people around him, an alienation that Rafi recognizes and feels himself. Rafi relates to Fyodorov both personally and philosophically. Not only does he agree with the philosophy of the common task as a unifying principle but he also empathizes with Fyodorov’s relative obscurity. When he tells Todd about Fyodorov for the first time, Rafi extolls the respect that Fyodorov earned from many of his time’s greatest writers, only to slip away into anonymity. This idea of lost genius resonates with Rafi as a young man who feels he’ll never be able to explain himself to the world. Rafi is one of the smartest characters in the novel, but his intelligence imbues him with a pessimistic fear that he’ll create something remarkable only for society to ignore it, just like Fyodorov. In essence, the common task symbolizes both Rafi’s desire to reconnect with an alienated world and his fear that his work won’t receive recognition.
Rafi is particularly vocal about Fyodorov’s notion of resurrecting the dead, another element of The Philosophy of the Common Task, or rather the Rafi of Todd’s memory talks at length about this. Just as the character and fate of Fyodorov resonated with Rafi, the discussion of a technology that could achieve the unimaginable resonates with Todd. Todd’s fixation on this element of Fyodorov’s writing illustrates clear difference between himself and Rafi. Todd can’t access Rafi’s private thoughts and thus misinterprets Fyodorov’s importance to his friend. He takes the idea of the common task so literally that he throws all his resources into resurrecting the dead through AI. Todd discards the unifying element of the common task, choosing to pursue resurrection as an individual pursuit (his personal AI, seeded with his memories) rather than as a social project. This misinterpretation highlights Todd’s growing disconnection from society and his failure to fully understand Rafi. Rather than reaching out to Rafi or creating a social project, Todd retreats into his memories and tries to resurrect a personalized version of Rafi that offers catharsis. He turns the social impact of the common task into an individual quest for redemption, foreshadowing his inevitable failure.
Todd’s attempts to create a common task fail since he dies before the AI device can finish telling the story. Nevertheless, the wealth that he plans to leave to Ina represents an alternative common task that has escaped his attention. As a young man, Todd found Evelyne’s book about the ocean captivating. The AI device recognizes this and includes the deceased Evelyne on the artificial Makatea, filling her with doubts about humanity’s destructive attitude toward the ocean. Furthermore, the US consortium that plans to invest in the island includes Todd as a member, illustrating his failure to understand that protecting the oceans is a vital common task. Armed with Todd’s billions, Ina could turn French Polynesia into the world’s largest nature reserve. She can use his money for good, uniting the people of Makatea and the rest of Polynesia in a project to save the oceans. Protecting the oceans is a subplot in the AI story, one that Todd overlooks in favor of his relationship with Rafi. Focused on bringing Rafi back to life, Todd misses his opportunity to carry out the common task. However, the inheritance will enable Ina to honor Rafi’s life through the creation of a common task, symbolizing how she understood Rafi in a way that Todd never did.
A small island in the Pacific, Makatea has been ravaged by colonial empires of the past. The island was rich in phosphate, an essential ingredient in many chemical fertilizers, and French mining companies plundered the island. This decimated the natural world, while the companies paid the local people a pittance to put their health at risk. In addition, the colonial introduction of Christianity replaced the old culture of the island. In essence, Makatea symbolizes the destructive nature of colonial extraction. By the novel’s era, some 60 years after the mining companies left Makatea, the island’s people, culture, and environment are only just beginning to recover. Colonial destruction likewise informs the politics around the referendum that takes place during the novel. A US consortium proposes to rebuild Makatea’s abandoned ports to turn the island into a staging area for the development of their ocean-going cities. The prospect of Western investment returning to Makatea represents the threat of neocolonialism. The colonial era may have ended, but the threat of exploitation continues.
The end of the novel reveals that the version of Makatea it portrays is an artificial reality, a story that an AI device tells to a dying man. For Todd, the island becomes home to the dead figures from his past. Ironically, the neocolonial threat to Makatea is itself a resurrection, bringing exploitation back to life when the people of the island are finally free. Fundamentally, the artificial version of Makatea symbolizes Todd’s desire to reunite with his friends as well as the impossibility of such a reunion. This Makatea isn’t a real place and can’t give Todd the real closure he seeks during his final days. Ultimately, the artificial Makatea becomes a symbol of Todd’s futile quest to undo the damage he has done.
By Richard Powers
Books & Literature
View Collection
Books that Feature the Theme of...
View Collection
Brothers & Sisters
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Community
View Collection
Earth Day
View Collection
Education
View Collection
Fate
View Collection
Fathers
View Collection
Friendship
View Collection
Loyalty & Betrayal
View Collection
Marriage
View Collection
Mortality & Death
View Collection
Order & Chaos
View Collection
Popular Study Guides
View Collection
Power
View Collection
Teams & Gangs
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection
The Booker Prizes Awardees & Honorees
View Collection