logo

63 pages 2 hours read

Charles Dickens

Our Mutual Friend

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1865

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Symbols & Motifs

The River Thames

The River Thames is an essential part of the plot and the aesthetics of Our Mutual Friend. The river winds through the city and the surrounding towns, uniting the rich and the poor alike despite The Rigidity of Social Class: The same river on which the poor boatmen float back and forth in search of ill-gotten gains facilitates international trade and brings John Harmon back from his exile abroad. The dirty, polluted river runs thick with the waste of the city, creating a unified symbol of the cost of London’s success. The Thames becomes a symbol of the pollution at the heart of the society itself; from murder to blackmail to the predatory practices of wealthy and poor people alike, the dirty river brings everyone together and mires them in the pollution of immorality.

Amid this corruption and pollution, the Thames plays an important narrative role. The story begins with a body being fished out of the water by Gaffer Hexam. This act is rife with the immorality that the river symbolizes, as Hexam searches the dead man’s pockets for any money. This is not the first body that will be found in the Thames; even Hexam himself will fall into the river and drown, implying that he has fallen victim to his own corruption. This points to the Thames’s symbolic moral dimension, carried even further in the case of Riderhood. Riderhood has a quasi-religious belief that, having survived a near-death experience in the water, he cannot drown again. Riderhood is shown to be incorrect, drowning in the river after attempting to blackmail Headstone. His death—as well as the death of Hexam—illustrates the forceful leveling effected by the river. In spite of whatever beliefs or talents these men had, they fall victim to the same human fragility which affects everyone else.

The river’s final, ironic role concerns the two men who survive falling into it: John and Eugene. John emerges with a new identity and Eugene with a new sense of morality, suggesting that in both cases, the Thames provides a symbolic baptism. This is unexpected given the river’s literal and figurative pollution, but it speaks to the novel’s somewhat cynical tone: Characters receive new life only after a brush with death and corruption.

The Dust Heaps

The vast Harmon fortune at the center of the plot was made from dust heaps. Dust heaps were giant mountains of dust, debris, garbage, and anything else that people wanted to throw away; they performed a public sanitation function as an improvised dumping ground in the urban environment and thus symbolize the rapid industrialization that has affected London. During the Victorian era, the city of London expanded rapidly. The newly dense urban environment was suddenly populated by a vast number of people who lacked the social institutions and knowledge to deal with all the wasteful byproducts of the modern age. The factories did not know what to do with the waste materials produced during manufacture, while the poor and rich neighborhoods alike lacked a means of disposing of regular household waste. Harmon’s dust heaps are a private, enriching enterprise—a way of capitalizing on the sudden needs of a changing society that has not yet formulated a social response to new demands. Their profitability suggests the way in which the rapidly changing city can make certain individuals very wealthy, but it also raises ethical questions about the societal costs (e.g., pollution) of such endeavors.

In fact, the heaps’ immense value reflects poorly on material wealth in general, suggesting that it too is “dirty”—exploitative and corrupt. However, the symbolism can also be reversed. Dust heaps contained lost items and valuables, but the “junk” itself also had value. The dust and other materials could be sold to manufacturers and factories to produce bricks, building supplies, and other goods. In this sense, the dust heaps serve as a reminder that “wealth” may exist in unexpected places, foreshadowing Bella’s realization that a happy marriage is preferable to a rich one.

Throughout the novel, the dust heaps are slowly cleared away. As the dust heaps disappear, many of the mysteries of the plot are similarly swept away. During one of his late-night literary sessions with Silas, Boffin fetches a bottle from the dust heaps that he once managed as Harmon’s employee. The item is later revealed to be a third will that clarifies the true ownership of the Harmon estate once and for all. The dust heaps here symbolize the filthy detritus of the past, which must be swept away before the future can be clarified. John Harmon’s identities, Boffin’s deceit, and Silas’s blackmail are all resolved once the dust heaps are removed.

Wills

The will motif is key to the novel’s exploration of wealth and greed. The novel opens with the death of Old Harmon, whose conflicting series of wills create confusion and encourage duplicitous behavior. The confusing nature of these competing wills, which variously bequeath Harmon’s fortune to the Boffins, the Crown, and John Harmon (on the condition of his marriage to Bella), symbolizes the spiteful legacy of John’s father. The dead Harmon was a bitter and cruel man who abused and alienated his family and did nothing to help anyone during his life. His wills symbolize the extent to which his cruel tricks linger after his death. Like the emotional trauma that continues to affect John, the dead Harmon’s legacy is one of bitter, twisted confusion that merely complicates the lives of those he supposedly wanted to inherit his estate.

In particular, the envy and scheming that the wills encourage suggest the corrupting effects of wealth (or the desire for it). When Silas and Venus discover a will that seems to disadvantage Boffin, they do not take the will to the authorities but rather attempt to blackmail him in exchange for keeping the will a secret. The second will (and the way in which it is used) symbolizes Silas’s break from morality. He has no interest in doing what is right—only in doing what will benefit him the most.

Ultimately, the second will is rendered meaningless by the discovery of a third will that grants everything to Boffin. However, Boffin decides to give everything to John and his new wife, Bella. This decision accomplishes the intention of the first will without any of the manipulative demands that the dead Harmon originally included, indicating Boffin’s rejection of the dead man’s cruelty. In effect, all three wills are rejected because they are undermined by Boffin’s final judgment, which is based on what he believes to be right rather than what some legal document demands. While this results in a happy ending for the novel’s characters, it indicates Dickens’s skepticism regarding both the legal system’s ability to adjudicate matters appropriately and society’s ability to distribute money fairly; the virtuous receive their reward only through a form of deus ex machina.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text