50 pages • 1 hour read
Zora Neale HurstonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Zora Neale Hurston was born in Notasulga, Alabama in 1891 to two working class parents. Her family relocated to Eatonville, Florida when Hurston was very young. The first decade of her life is largely a mystery, as she intentionally lied to her biographer and others throughout her life, claiming to be born in 1901 instead. What is known about her childhood is that she and her stepmother engaged in a tumultuous relationship after Hurston’s mother died. During her life, Hurston published four novels, several nonfiction works, and many short stories, essays, and articles. She was part of the Harlem Renaissance movement, an artistic and literary movement that aimed to celebrate Black perspectives. She attended Howard University, Barnard College, and Columbia University and won two Guggenheim Fellowship grants for her research in Jamaica and Haiti. She died at the age of 69 in 1960 in a welfare home in Florida and was buried in an unmarked grave until fellow author Alice Walker rediscovered her grave in 1973. Posthumously, she is recognized for her major contributions to modern literature, namely in regards to Black American and feminist literature.
Hurston’s work was highly influenced by the complex sociopolitical changes that transpired from her birth through World War II. As such, her writing reflects nuanced ideas that are not always easily digestible for readers. For example, her views about Black folklore as reflected in Mules and Men are left largely unstated in the work and are rather implied by the content she chose to include, or exclude, and the tone of the work. Hurston viewed folklore as artistic syntheses of the world around an emerging cultural zeitgeist—something that many Black Americans had to negotiate during and after slavery. Her views regarding politics, especially as precursors to the Civil Rights Movement in United States began at the end of her life, ostracized her from many other salient Black authors and artists of her time. For example, she condemned the 1954 Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education because she feared it would cost many Black teachers their jobs, thereby depriving Black students of the support they need from these teachers. Her transition into obscurity during her life is congruous of many of her aims in publishing Mules and Men: Like the disappearing folklore and hoodoo that reflect ideas that are sometimes problematic when read today, Hurston too disappeared when neither Black nor white audiences were interested in the conflicting complexities of her work.
The posthumous revitalization in Hurston’s work initiated by Alice Walker is an important factor when assessing Hurston’s writing. What was too complex, undesirable, or mysterious about Hurston’s work while she was alive has gained a new sense of appreciation. This is in no small part related to the authenticity of Hurston’s writing, as readers today are offered a unique view into a past that is not well-documented. Before her death, the Black literary tradition in the United States moved away from the semi-phonetic representations of Black speech because many white authors had used these conventions while upholding racist rhetoric. Her contemporary authors of color felt that representing speech in this way was actually furthering racist and reductive views about Black and African Americans. Decades after this debate, however, works like Mules and Men now function as a time capsule, and Hurston’s unrelenting emphasis on authenticity renders her representations of Black communities in the Deep South valuable commemorations of times and people long past.
Franz Boas was a German anthropologist who lived and researched for the greater part of his career in the United States at Columbia University in New York City. Born in 1858, he relocated to the United States in 1887 where he resided for the remainder of his life. He died in 1942 and is known as the “father of American anthropology” because of his extensive contributions to changing the field and its theoretical standards.
Boas was Hurston’s professor and mentor at the beginning of her writing career and time at Barnard College, a school within Columbia University. Boas stands out amongst other anthropologists of his time because he opposed the scientific racism rampant during his life and suggested the new theory of cultural relativism. Anthropology was a field hugely hindered by elements of scientific racism: If one culture or race is presumed to be superior—and it is almost exclusively white Euro-Americans who were presumed to be superior—then there can be no true assessment of any culture or social group. Boas’s cultural relativism, therefore, paved the way for authors like Hurston to create inclusive anthropological works that, like Mules and Men, are not focused on white communities or cultural comparison.
Charlotte Osgood Mason was an American philanthropist who funded the work of several artists and authors during the Harlem Renaissance, many of whom were Black. She lived from 1854-1946 and was a white woman of generational wealth. Her patronage to artists like Hurston was essential during the Great Depression, when many institutions were underfunded. She gave over $100,000 in funding during her lifetime, which equates to over $1 million in 2022.
Mason funded Hurston’s work on Mules and Men from 1928-1932. This funding was essential in the production of this work because Hurston faced many difficulties in publishing it—she took over two years organizing her notes and writing the final product. Mason, however, shared a problematic relationship with the artists she funded, Hurston included. She and Hurston had several disagreements over the publication of Mules and Men, indicating that Mason felt she could exercise some influence over the work. In Rampersad’s Foreword to this book, he reveals that Mason pushed Hurston to research hoodoo because she was interested in the topic herself. Mason’s visible involvement in the works she funded leaves some scholars with the impression that certain aspects of Mules and Men were tailored to appease her.
Marie Laveau was probably born in 1801 and died in 1881 in New Orleans, Louisiana. She is still known as “The Voodoo Queen of New Orleans” and practiced hoodoo somewhat openly. She was a woman of color who was subject to many rumors about her relationship to hoodoo throughout her life. Her daughter, who is most likely the subject of discussion in Part 2, Chapter 2 of Mules and Men, was named Marie Laveau II. She was born in 1827 and is said to have held feasts on the Eve of Saint John, just as Turner states.
Laveau’s role in Mules and Men is tangential: She is long dead before Hurston arrives in New Orleans looking for hoodoo doctors. This is, however, indicative of Laveau’s infamy that renders her a caricature of herself, often preceded by the legends and myths surrounding her life. Because hoodoo is so mysterious and entwined with superstitions and myths, Laveau’s relationship to the practice cements her as the face of this mystery. The extent to which Laveau practiced her hoodoo is unknown, as it was already mystified before her death: Many articles were written about Laveau and her allegedly devious hoodoo rituals while she was alive. The obsession with Laveau recorded in Mules and Men illustrates that she remains an essential hoodoo figure—one that now supersedes the woman who lived in the 19th century, as shown by the conflation of Marie Laveau and her daughter.
By Zora Neale Hurston