logo

70 pages 2 hours read

James S. A. Corey

Leviathan Wakes

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2011

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Value of Connection, Family, and Home

Leviathan Wakes emphasizes the theme of family and home on a macro and micro scale. Planets, stations, and spaceships are all important as places characters call home. And all the major characters have strong emotional ties to family, or the idea of family, whether those bonds are bound by blood or by choice.

Miller’s family isn’t mentioned, beyond references to his ex-wife and his regret over not having had any children of his own. On Ceres, he lives in a tiny apartment that he calls his “hole,” not his “home,” which reflects his general sense of isolation and disconnection. Miller’s lack of close connections exacerbates those feelings. His infatuation with Julie Mao and clear envy of the camaraderie between the Roci crew illustrate his intense longing for family connections. When Holden says, “I want the whole crew together” (386), Miller weeps upon realizing he’s included in that number. When that relationship sours, Miller takes solace in his imaginary Julie, who says, “You knew it couldn’t last. […] You knew you didn’t really belong there. You belong with me” (443). As a figment of Miller’s imagination, this “Julie” is really Miller speaking to himself, consoling himself over the loss of something he desperately wants but can’t have. That he settles for “belonging” with a hallucination reveals the wounded state of his psyche.

Amos doesn’t have any close family connections in Leviathan Wakes, but later entries in the series reveal he grew up an orphan in Baltimore, Maryland, where he was raised by a sex worker and then recruited into a crime gang. The narrative draws a direct connection between Amos’s dubious morality and his childhood steeped in crime and poverty. He opens up to Miller in the bar after the raid on Protogen:

I know what I am, and my moral compass? I’ll tell you, it’s fucked. A few things fell different when I was a kid. I could have been those ass-bandits on Thoth. I know that. Captain couldn’t have been. It’s not in him. He’s as close to righteous as anyone out here gets (431).

As the Roci crew coalesces into a familial unit, Amos adopts Holden as his moral compass, and he folds the crew into the small circle of precious people to whom he is fiercely loyal—because life has taught him that it’s rare to find people one can trust implicitly, whether on the streets of Baltimore or in the vacuum of space.

Naomi’s family isn’t mentioned in Leviathan Wakes, but later in the series it becomes clear that family is one of her primary motivations. She has a son who was taken from her years earlier, and she has never given up hope of reuniting with him. Alex’s family also takes on importance later in the series, when readers learn he essentially abandoned his wife and child to pursue his adventures as a space pilot. Alex seems of two minds about this—he regrets leaving his family on Mars, but he keeps his distance anyway, choosing to stay with his newfound family on the Roci.

Among the crew, Holden is the only one with a stable family and a home waiting for him. His early family life in Montana seems idyllic. He is the only child of eight parents, and he thinks of his family often and fondly. The family’s 22-acre farm is compared to a national park on Earth, where available open land is scarce. Holden could walk away and retire there at any time, yet, much like Alex, he leaves his family behind in pursuit of something more, something he can truly call his own. The Canterbury is described as the only home he’s known for five years, and its crew is likened to his family. This is a prelude to the Rocinante becoming a true home for its five-person crew and their developing family bonds. Holden’s feelings are evident when he leaves Tycho Station, where he has comfortable quarters, to spend a night sleeping in a cot on the Roci, which feels like home. This underscores the value and significance of found families made by choice.

Conflict Incited by Tribalism and Othering

Leviathan Wakes, and the broader Expanse series, explores the pervasive themes of conflict and tribalism within a vast and complex setting, portraying how various factions, including corporate interests, political entities, and emerging societies, vie for power and resources. Though this worldbuilding, the authors delve into the intricacies of human relationships and examine how individuals navigate loyalty, betrayal, and alliances amid conflict, ultimately offering nuanced commentary on the persistent nature of tribalistic tendencies among populations even when humanity expands beyond the confines of Earth. This commentary is ultimately critical, as these divided interests give rise to discord and conflict, which in turn has consequences that ripple throughout the Sol system.

As the first entry in a nine-book series, Leviathan Wakes engages in a lot of worldbuilding, establishing the setting for its sequels. Earthers and Martians are most like the book’s readers, and they receive comparatively little focus in this book, which focuses more exclusively on the Roci and the Belt. Even so, tribalism is clear in the power struggle between Mars, Earth, and the Belt, which are gripped in a military stalemate that turns into outright war after the destruction of the Canterbury. Earthers are framed as entitled aristocrats, and Martians as rebellious colonists. Earth fears Mars’s technological superiority, and—though it has attained independence—Mars still resents its former overseer. Both planets depend on the Belt for resources, but many Inners exhibit prejudice toward the Belters, the working-class people who provide them. It’s suggested the discrimination stems partly from Belters evolving certain physical characteristics that mark them as different from most Earthers.

These physiological differences are undeniable. Belters are taller and thinner, and their bones are brittle, consequences of a life lived in low gravity. However, Belters share other environment-related differences that unite them as a tribe. As Miller points out, Belters know that water deliveries are critical, and resource delivery disruptions aren’t merely an inconvenience but a matter of life or death. This is why they view the destruction of a water hauler like the Canterbury as justification for war.

Although Belters are inclined to be fighters—both defensively and preemptively—as a political entity, they are massively overpowered by the technological and economic superiority of the inner planets. They engage in guerrilla tactics to assert their voice and secure power, but the inner planets, who would prefer to keep the belt subservient, view these attempts as terrorism. Belters already harbor suspicion and contempt toward the Inners, based on a long history of mistreatment, exploitation, and mutual mistrust, but the Canterbury’s destruction heightens the antagonism between the three powers. Miller witnesses this firsthand on Ceres when he sees Belter kill a Martian woman in the riots on Ceres, and when he observes changing sentiments toward his Earther partner, Havelock.

It is surprising, then, when Havelock accuses Miller of buying into a racist viewpoint about Belters. The “selective effect” is based on the notion that Belters have become so altered by their physical environmental requirements that they’ve become something less than human. This is a complex thematic idea, since it introduces the notion of racism based on environmental dependencies. It’s an Earther who expresses contempt for the viewpoint, while Miller—a Belter—protests that he doesn’t agree with it but thinks to himself that he probably does.

So, while Inners might marginalize Belters for various perceived differences, Belters themselves tend to be isolationist in their thinking. Many are suspicious and contemptuous toward the Inners, perhaps disregarding their humanity and seeing them only as a threat.

These disparate groups are so entrenched in their cultural and ideological differences that they lose sight of binds them together: their humanity. The Protomolecule, an ancient alien technology so complex that it defies human understanding, thus becomes a sort of a foil for humanity. It is both a threat—its first course of action upon reawakening is annihilation Earth, and its mysterious activities on Venus foreshadow more conflict to come—and a mirror, one that exposes the triviality of tribalistic divisions when all humanity is facing the same threat. The series is ultimately a meditation on human nature, one that questions whether people are able acknowledge their similarities and overcome their differences when the fate of humanity is at stake. The lack of cooperation in the book’s final chapters, in which individuals make the hard choices while the higher powers squabble over authority, even when dealing with an unprecedent development that could obliterate the very cradle of humanity, suggests this is unlikely. The emergency of the Protomolecule doesn’t inspire unity but arms race and further brinkmanship, in which each faction works to secure its own best interests. Indeed, tribalistic conflicts between groups underlie the conflicts that unfold in the next eight novels.

Cynicism Versus Idealism

Leviathan Wakes ponders many philosophical questions, including the value of cynicism versus idealism. This balance between cynicism and idealism is most apparent in the story’s two key viewpoint characters: Miller and Holden. While cynicism and idealism are opposites, the authors imbue these two characters with both traits—suggesting that neither can function without the other as a counterweight.

Miller is almost a caricature of a cynical beat cop. As an exchange with his lifelong friend Sematimba illustrates, he would rather be the boot than the ass. He is sarcastic and hardened to the depravity of the criminal element he encounters every day. As the name “Miller” suggests, he grinds away at his job. He works hard, but he derives little joy from it.

On the surface, Miller is the picture of a jaded, pessimistic cynic. Yet his rich inner life contradicts that stereotype. He is sensitive, conjuring up images an elusive young woman who provides him companionship in much the same way imaginary friends comfort lonely children. It turns out he is principled: He is supposed to kidnap Julie and send her to her parents, but he roots for her when she resists them, and he later admits that even if he found her in time, he never would have sent her home, despite the potential financial reward.

The cynical Miller can kill without remorse, but he gets no pleasure from it, as seen when he kills Dresden, the architect of Protogen’s mass murder experiments with the Protomolecule. This decision is guided by both cynicism and idealism. Miller believes Dresden could sway others to carry out evil on a grand scale, which suggests a cynical view of human nature. Yet in Miller’s mind, Dresden could damage humanity in unimaginable and irreversible ways. He kills Dresden not because of crimes already committed but because of the man’s potential to cause greater destruction. Miller knows his decision is not compatible with social norms or jurisprudence like due process of the law, but he willingly sacrifices his own interests for the greater good—practically the definition of an idealist.

Miller is not aware of his idealism, though, which is something of a tragedy. If his behavior was less cynical, he might be more capable of making the human connections he longs for. However, if he had those connections, he probably would not be driven to leave everything behind and seek emotional satisfaction in the embrace of the Julie-piloted Protomolecule. Miller’s desire to find Julie enables him to find himself. Once by her side, Miller persuades Julie to guide Eros toward Venus (not a coincidence that it symbolizes love) to save Earth. He does the job every cop is supposed to do: protect the people.

Idealism is apparent in many of Holden’s choices; it is his most obvious character trait. His idealism was display when he stood his moral ground against a senior officer in the UN Navy and was discharged for his insubordination, and when he compels the captain of the Canterbury to abide by the rules of space travel and undertake an unlikely rescue mission. It is especially clear in his belief that it is right to share all the facts he has about the attack on the Canterbury, whether they’re complete or not. Though noble, this impulse is naïve; Holden doesn’t have the political savvy to anticipate or understand the repercussions of his actions. In fact, he’s later blamed for starting a war between the Belt and Mars.

Yet, this view of Holden is incomplete. Readers learn that on the Cant he wanted to stay under the radar. He wanted to do his job well but avoid leadership responsibilities. His relationships with women were mainly superficial. His inner monologues are filled with self-doubt. He’s also mistrustful, as seen in his initial refusal to collaborate with Fred Johnson. Each of these traits reflect a level of cynicism despite Holden’s strong ideals.

Others see Holden in a better light than he sees himself. Naomi tells Holden he’s the “most righteous” person she knows. She admires his commitment to a set of moral and ethical standards. Miller behaves as though he’s contemptuous of Holden’s idealism. For one thing, he believes it’s prudent to analyze information, consider the consequences, and share it selectively—not broadcast it irresponsibly. However, though Miller’s external persona is cynical and Holden’s is idealistic, each man has his own moral compass, and they share many of the same end goals. They have very different ideas about the best course of action, but both combine attributes of cynicism and idealism.

As foils, Miller and Holden are two sides of the same coin: They have many differences, yet they’re more alike than they realize. This is reflected in the book’s alternating perspectives. Both are crucial to telling a complete story, just as a healthy dose of cynicism is key to tempering unbridled idealism, and vice versa.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Related Titles

By James S. A. Corey