logo

50 pages 1 hour read

J. Hector St. John de Crèvecœur

Letters From An American Farmer

Nonfiction | Collection of Letters | Adult | Published in 1782

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Key Figures

James

James, a yeoman farmer and the author of the majority of the letters, is friendly and accommodating. He is also modest about these attributes, insisting to Mr. F.B. that “I gave you nothing more than what common hospitality dictated” (9). He is equally modest about his ability to write, expressing surprise that Mr. F.B. does not have “persons more enlightened and better educated” (9-10) with whom to exchange letters and declaring that the task of describing life in America requires “a variety of talents which [James does] not possess” (9). James is extremely humble and has only simple aims, claiming to have “never possessed nor wish[ed] to possess anything more than what could be earned or produced by the united industry of [his] family” (202), and to be satisfied with “the narrow circles in which [he] constantly revolve[s]” (38). He also claims to “envy no man’s prosperity,” wanting only “to teach the same philosophy to [his] children” so that they can “be like their father, good, substantial, independent American farmers” (38). It is interesting to note that, despite such celebrations of humble American lives, he is, initially at least, intimidated by the task of writing to Mr. F.B. precisely because his correspondent is an educated Englishman.

James is highly critical of Europe’s traditional hierarchies and exploitation of the poor, seeing America as a place where common people can live free, work for themselves, and build happy, humble lives. He repeatedly points out that America “is not composed, as in Europe, of great lords who possess everything and a herd of people who have nothing” (39-40), and suggests that Americans are all “united by the silken bands of mild government, all respecting the laws without dreading their power, because they are equitable” (40). He even goes so far as to declare America “the most perfect society now existing in the world” (40). One aspect of life in America that he especially values is the chance to commune freely with the natural world. He is fascinated by nature, and says that “the whole economy of what we proudly call the brute creation is admirable in every circumstance,” and compares favorably to “the imperfect systems of men” (35). However, to a degree, this changes towards the end of the book. After seeing “a Negro, suspended in [a] cage and left there to expire” (164), James, who is a slave owner but who deplores the more overt cruelty of Southern plantation slavery, begins to despair of humanity in general, asking “[t]he history of the earth! Doth it present anything but crimes of the most heinous nature[?]” (159). He includes nature in this morbid speculation, too, observing that “we often talk of an indulgent nature, a kind parent […] Yet if we attentively view this globe, will it not appear rather a place of punishment than of delight?” (160-61). Despite this, he still considers the natural “state of men in the woods” to be superior “to that of men in a more improved situation” (163). As the Revolutionary War draws nearer and James comes to be disillusioned with both Europe and America, it is with this idea in mind that he decides live with Native Americans so that he can “revert into a state approaching nearer to that of nature, unencumbered either with voluminous laws or contradictory codes” (201).

The Minister

James’s local minister is the first person to introduce the key themes of American identity, social differences between Europe and America, and the relationships between people and the environments in which they live. Himself a humble man who, “like the rest of us, […] must till his farm” (10), he believes that Americans “have in some measure regained the ancient dignity of our species,” living humbly with “simple and just” laws (13). He argues that the traditionally-stratified societies of Europe cannot understand the potential of common people given the chance to thrive, suggesting that James “will appear to [Mr. F.B.] something like one of our wild American plants […] which an European scholar may probably think ill-placed and useless” (17). It is these views on the value of humble men, the importance of simple, natural living, and the great worth of the American colonies that lead him to encourage James in his letter writing. Dismissing James’s modesty, he tells him that, while his letters may “be not elegant, they will smell of the woods and be a little wild” (12) and insists that he will be a “more entertaining” correspondent “dressed in your simple American garb than if you were clad in all the gowns of Cambridge” (17).

James’s Wife

Although James makes reference to her throughout the book, his wife only appears in a prominent manner in the first letter. Here, she is highly skeptical about James’s correspondence with Mr. F.B., asking him “would’st thee pretend to send epistles to a great European man” (10) who “knows most of our famous lawyers and cunning folks; who hath conversed with many king’s men, governors, and counsellors[?]” (10-11), and insisting that Mr. F.B. surely “means to jeer thee!” (11). Once she is sure of Mr. F.B.’s “sober earnest intention” (11), she still urges James to keep his writing “as a great secret as if it was some heinous crime” (19). Her skepticism, which serves as a counterpoint to the minister’s enthusiasm, actually comes from the same place: a love of, and respect for, the humble lifestyles of American farmers. Where the minister thinks that such lives should be celebrated and discussed for the edification of the educated-but-ignorant Mr. F.B., James’s wife thinks they should simply be lived, as humbly as possible. That is to say, she believes that even to engage in writing to an educated Englishman is a betrayal of their simple lives, and represents James moving away from a life like his father’s, spent as “a plain-dealing, honest man […] of few words” (19).

Andrew

James (and, we might infer, de Crèvecoeur) presents “honest Andrew” (79) as an American success story, or an example of how America provides an opportunity for the poor of Europe, long exploited and overlooked in their native lands, to build good lives for themselves. Along with his family, Andrew leaves a life of poverty on “the island of Barra” (72) in Scotland to emigrate to America. He arrives with very little but is instantly welcomed by his new neighbors, which serves as a display of the friendly, accommodating nature that James considers key to the American character. Andrew works hard for others, laboring tirelessly to earn enough money to purchase some land and displaying the industriousness that James also presents as central to American identity. Through his own sober determination and the support of his new community, Andrew is eventually able to build himself a farm and a home in which he can live a simple and rewarding, self-sufficient life “unencumbered with debts, services, rents, or any other dues” (82). As such, he stands as example of an early form of the American Dream, showing the successes that can come through “sobriety and industry, when united with good land and freedom” (82).

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text