logo

40 pages 1 hour read

Sarah Vowell

Lafayette in the Somewhat United States

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2015

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Key Figures

Sarah Vowell

Sarah Vowell is the author of the book as well as an active participant in the story she tells. The framing device of Lafayette in the Somewhat United States involves Vowell visiting different landmarks that celebrate Lafayette’s contributions to American independence. She acts as a moderating voice between myths Americans tell themselves about the Revolutionary War and the truths, which do not always reflect Washington, the American cause, or the rebels’ dependence on the French reinforcements in the most flattering light.

Vowell writes with humor and sarcasm. She clearly loves America but is at ease poking fun at, and asking serious questions about, what she sees as its hypocrisies. For instance, Americans fought for their freedom from the British Empire. But they actively participated in the institution of slavery. Considering American politicians that “all men are created equal” in the Declaration of Independence, their acceptance and promotion of slavery contradicts that belief, showing that America was willing to fight for the independence of some people, but not all.

As in her other nonfiction books, Vowell’s presence in the story makes the history more accessible and livelier. Her light, irreverent writing style is more inviting than many history texts.

Lafayette

Although he is only referred to as Lafayette, the Frenchman’s full name and title was Marie-Joseph Paul Yves Roch Gilbert du Motier, Marquis de Lafayette. When he enters the story told in Lafayette in the Somewhat United States, he is a headstrong, wealthy, recently orphaned teenager. He craved father figures and “tended to confuse glory with love” (31).

Vowell compares Lafayette’s ambition and lust for glory to that of Theodore Roosevelt, the 26th president of the United States and another man who found the idea of sitting on the sidelines during a war unbearable.

In America, Lafayette proved himself to be a courageous, clever, and useful soldier. He was charismatic and persuasive enough to gain the favor of powerful men like George Washington, who agreed to give him a command despite being a foreign-born teenager whose country was not yet involved in the conflict.

Lafayette also showed he was immature and emotionally callous. When the war began, he saw it as an opportunity to enrich his own life and indulge in his quest for glory. He abandoned Adrienne, his pregnant, teenage wife, leaving her alone in France while he went on his adventure. He put the American cause above his own safety and never prioritizes his family or domestic obligations.

Lafayette was also given to embellishments. Many of the letters Vowell quotes from in the book have a grandiose air and paint Lafayette in such a flattering light that it is as if he wrote them hoping they would be read and studied one day.

One of the reasons why Vowell decided to write about Lafayette is that, whatever his faults were, he was one of the few people Americans were able to agree on during the war. In a partisan country given to petty infighting, Lafayette was a symbol of common ground, courage, and devotion to the cause of American independence.

George Washington

In Lafayette, Washington appears as the commander of the Continental Army and the most influential figure in Lafayette’s life. He was the teenager’s primary father figure after Lafayette arrived in America. Washington was a steadying influence, and Lafayette was occasionally capable of penetrating the leader’s legendary reserve and aloofness. Washington showed genuine affection in his letters to the Frenchman, speaking openly of his admiration for Lafayette and encouraging him.

Washington provided a stark contrast to the men who viewed the war as an adventure or opportunity to self-mythologize. Washington served as commander because he believed the war was worth fighting and that he could best command the Continental forces; therefore, it was his duty to do so.

Christopher Densmore

Densmore is a curator at the Friends History Library, located in the Quaker college at Swarthmore. Densmore appears briefly in the book, but his statements about history raise provocative questions for those who believe there are justifiable wars and for those who do not expose themselves to multiple historical narratives. Densmore may be the closest thing to a detractor of Lafayette in the book: He knew “exactly who he was” but also “had a problem with him” (115). But Densmore’s problem with Lafayette is not personal. It was simply that he is a pacifist, while Lafayette gloried in combat.

Densmore tells Vowell, “We understand our history as war” (111). He believes that tying the American story to a military victory glorifies war and may lead to Americans visualizing their nation as a country of fighters.

Densmore also acts as a foil to Vowell. She is well versed in history, particularly American history, yet she had not drawn the same conclusions as Densmore. By writing another book about war, in Densmore’s view, Vowell adds to the problem of Americans conflating history with war.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Related Titles

By Sarah Vowell