logo

87 pages 2 hours read

Bryan Stevenson

Just Mercy

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2014

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.

Key Figures

Bryan Stevenson

Bryan Stevenson is the book’s narrator and central figure. Over the course of Just Mercy, Stevenson progresses from a timid, unexperienced intern to an accomplished, dedicated lawyer, educator, and activist. Stevenson grows up in a rural, black family in Southern Delaware. Despite the technical dissolving of Jim Crow and legal segregation, Stevenson’s larger black community is “strong and determined but marginalized and excluded” (13). His family values education and the women of the family, in particular, urge Stevenson to look outside his own experiences. His mother is quick to correct him when he laughs at a boy with a speech impediment. His grandmother, the daughter of slaves and the family matriarch, tells him that “‘You can’t understand most of the important things from a distance, Bryan. You have to get close’” (14).

Stevenson grew up in a rural black community, and this connects him to many of his clients and their families. While his adult life was marked by an elite education and professional degrees, this does not erase his race or his childhood class status. He was raised by people who lived through the heyday of KKK, Jim Crow, and the Civil Rights Movement. He feels a strong connection to others who had similar experiences. When Mrs. Williams braves a police dog to enter Walter’s hearing and tells Stevenson that she is present, he feels “A deep sense of recognition” (180).

Stevenson’s early experiences inform his outlook and approach to life. Throughout Just Mercy, Stevenson displays high levels of empathy and a particular sense of fairness and justice. From the first time he meets a death row client, Stevenson approaches these men and women as human beings with rights and value to the world. Despite the fact that many of them have committed crimes—often murder—he consistently uses the word “we” in his narrative. Stevenson manages to see strong connections between himself and his clients. At one point, he states, “We are all broken by something…We all share the condition of brokenness, even if our brokenness is not equivalent” (288). Stevenson acknowledges his own brokenness and asks the reader to see theirs. From this, it is clear that Stevenson highly values the communal human experience and does not see criminality as something that erases a person’s humanity. He is a tireless crusader for justice on behalf of marginalized people largely ignored by society. It is this innate, righteous thirst for fairness in an unfair world that drives his work. It is no coincidence that he chooses to structure his book around the Walter McMillian case. It is, at its core, a true and obvious injustice, the very thing Stevenson has devoted his life to fighting. On the eve of Walter’s hearing, Stevenson resolves that Walter’s innocence will be determined not by legal maneuvering, but “would be based on simple justice—he was an innocent man” (208).

Walter McMillian

Walter McMillian is a man wrongly convicted of murdering a white woman. He languishes on death row for years before the hard work of Bryan Stevenson and the Equal Justice Initiative frees him. After gaining his freedom, he travels the country speaking of his experience before tragically succumbing to trauma-induced dementia and dying in 2013. Stevenson, who spent many hours with Walter both during his imprisonment and after, describes him as a “kind, decent man with a generous nature” (103). He is, of course, not without his faults. His involvement in the murder trial stemmed from his affair with a younger white woman. He cheated on his ever-faithful wife and drank too much. And yet, for any bad decisions he has made, Stevenson and his family all believe Walter to be a person who consistently tries “to do the right thing” (104).

Walter is shown to be introspective and contemplative, and Stevenson acknowledges that his time in prison may have contributed to this. Without much to do, Walter escapes into his thoughts. He is concerned for the well-being of others, particularly his fellow death rows inmates. Each execution he witnesses makes him deeply sorrowful and physically ill. When he is finally freed from prison, he is anguished at having to leave the friends he has made. Even in his moment of greatest triumph, he is still thinking of those left behind.

After he is released, Walter channels his energy into remaking his life. He speaks at many events and to Stevenson’s law students, something Stevenson is grateful for. Stevenson notes what a tremendous effect Walter’s “personality, presence, and witness” (249) has on the students. When he speaks to groups, Walter is clear to state that he is not “angry or bitter” (249) about his experiences, something which displays great strength of character and an almost inhuman capacity for forgiveness, given the wrongs Walter has experienced. This is something that Stevenson remarks upon at Walter’s funeral—his mercy. “Walter’s strength, resistance, and perseverance were a triumph worth celebrating,” Stevenson writes, “an accomplishment to be remembered” (313).

Ralph Myers

Ralph Myers is the chief witness against Walter in his first trial and the chief witness for Walter in the hearing to overturn Walter’s conviction. Stevenson first describes Ralph as a “white man with a badly disfigured face and a lengthy criminal record” (31). Ralph has endured terrible hardships in his life, including a childhood in foster care in which he was terribly burned in an accident. He has emerged “emotional and frail,” a “tragic outcast” who “craved attention,” (31) which makes him an easily manipulated witness for the prosecution. He is coerced, bullied, and threatened into falsely implicating Walter in the murders. Ralph is not without a conscience and frequently tries to recant his false statements. For this, he is placed on death row, transported to mental facilities, and further threatened by Sherriff Tate and others. Ultimately, Ralph manages to redeem himself. Of his own volition, he contacts Stevenson and offers to speak on Walter’s behalf. He is Stevenson’s star witness at the hearing. He is “direct and persuasive” and his testimony is key in getting Walter freed.

Sherriff Tate

Sherriff Tom Tate is the corrupt, racist county sheriff directly responsible—along with many others—for Walter’s wrongful conviction and imprisonment. Remarkably, he shares a surname with the fictional Heck Tate, the sheriff in To Kill a Mockingbird. He is proudly provincial and never “ventured too far from Monroeville” (33). He is also unabashedly racist, spewing “racial slurs and threats” (47) at Walter during interrogation. Sherriff Tate is new to his position during the murders and feels intense pressure to close the cases. Because of this, he is willing to hide evidence and bully Ralph Myers into false testimony. Even when it is clear that Walter is innocent, Tate won’t release him. “The arrest had been too long in the making to admit yet another failure” (51). He appears to have few scruples and is more concerned with his standing in the community than in truth or real justice

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text