52 pages • 1 hour read
Tahereh MafiA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Love triangles are a common, though often polarizing, trope in young adult romance novels. Following this trope, each potential partner represents something more than themselves as an individual to the protagonist; typically, each romantic option indicates a choice the protagonist must make in other avenues of their life, such as in the tension between clinging to a past version of themselves or progressing and changing, even when that change is frightening or difficult.
Ignite Me’s romantic tension between Juliette’s two love interests, brothers Adam and Warner, provides a twist on this trope, as Juliette does not truly consider a romantic relationship with Warner until after she has ended her relationship with Adam (in previous installment Unravel Me). This difference creates a more stark “breaking point” between Juliette’s experience with the two contrasting values that her love interests represent (though there is some “in between” represented in Unravel Me). In Ignite Me, Juliette measures her current self against her past self—represented in the first novel in the series, Shatter Me. While Juliette describes this version of herself as “broken,” Adam—who’s resistant to any shift in Juliette’s personality—characterizes it as “goodness” or “sweetness,” framing any growth or change in Juliette, by implication, as a rejection of this goodness regardless of the increased happiness these changes afford her. Warner, by contrast, continually praises Juliette’s increasing strength and confidence. Warner’s view of Juliette, the text implies, adheres more closely to the version of herself that Juliette herself wants to embody in Ignite Me—a version she eagerly adopts following surviving being shot by Anderson—whereas Adam can’t let go of the person she used to be. As Juliette tells Kenji in Chapter 39, she isn’t choosing between the men, but rather choosing to put herself first.
Yet Adam’s continued insistence that his relationship with Juliette is not over (despite Kenji and other Omega Point members’ claims that they witnessed Adam and Juliette’s dramatic breakup) brings the love triangle back into the present of the narrative. By raising this romantic tension after Juliette has made the choice to end things with Adam, Tahereh Mafi centers the aftermath of that decision, refocusing the choice on Juliette rather than on the two male love interests. Additionally, as Juliette grows closer to Warner, Adam’s response to that rejection—wishing she had died, and calling her “crazy” despite knowing her painful history incarcerated in a mental institution, reinforces Juliette’s confidence in her choice. Adam’s behavior in the wake of Juliette’s rejection provides a stark contrast with his behavior during their relationship when he insisted he loved her, would do anything to be with her, and sought to protect her. In this way, Juliette’s choice to be with Warner also represents a desire to embrace her personal growth, strength, and confidence—something Adam refuses to do.
Dystopian fiction is often characterized by its dark tone and exploration of serious topics within the dystopian world of the text that provide commentary on the society from which the author writes. Though often less grim than adult dystopian fiction and more likely to contain romantic subplots, YA dystopian fiction is likewise somber in tone and less likely to contain strong friendships than other YA subgenres, such as contemporary YA, where friendships are frequently represented as the center of a protagonist’s social life. The absence of these friendships in dystopias reinforces the alienating conditions created by systems of oppression that define the society as dystopian, frequently leading to the physical and social isolation of the protagonist. Ignite Me, by contrast, includes a strong friendship characterized by lively banter between Kenji and Juliette—often even in the midst of serious scenes, such as when they quip about Juliette’s inability to swim even as they face daunting odds on Anderson’s ship in the final battle of the novel. Mafi leaves only one scene in the text free from banter, thus underscoring its gravitas and Juliette’s growing feelings for Warner: the episode where Warner (who, unbeknownst to Juliette, is grieving his mother’s death) does not arrive to a scheduled meeting point and she is worried for his safety.
The moments of levity and joviality that Juliette’s friendships lend to Ignite Me (and the fact that only an interpersonal issue, not a societal one, can disrupt this joviality) create a nuanced tone for the novel in which the darkness of Juliette’s circumstances is balanced by the affection and pleasure of her closest relationships. In this way, Mafi underscores the importance of such friendships as beacons of hope despite the cruelty and oppression of The Reestablishment. Friends (and, as Kenji continually asserts, best friends) in Ignite Me thus emerge as even more central to the lives of the teenage characters as they navigate difficult, painful, and life-threatening circumstances.
While Kenji continually reminds Adam that his romantic feelings for Juliette are not of central importance given the danger they find themselves facing, he does not contend that friendships are equally unimportant. Rather, the reverse emerges: Friends, in a world where traditional kinship structures are routinely and intentionally dismantled, become surrogate families—a necessary transition since the characters’ biological families are almost unilaterally dead, abusive, or otherwise estranged. As part of a bid to stamp out any resistance, The Reestablishment’s desire for control privileges the citizens’ relationship to the (corrupt) state above all, viewing any other relationship or allegiance as a threat. In such a world, friendships become an act of defiance against a corrupt and oppressive system. In Ignite Me, even family members who are present in one another’s lives and not overtly hostile to one another—such as Warner and Delalieu—experience a dearth of familial intimacy due to the pervasive atmosphere of suspicion created by the totalitarian regime in which they live. When Juliette learns of Warner’s distance from his grandfather, she understands, thinking, “Just because you’re bound by blood does not make you a family” (194). In fact, in Juliette’s experience blood connections almost never result in a supportive or loving relationship. Friendship, by contrast, is framed as the primary affective connection between characters in the novel—a relationship that is portrayed as life-sustaining, capable of becoming a mode of resistance in itself.
By opening Ignite Me with her protagonist’s overt intention to kill Supreme Commander Anderson, Mafi establishes a moral compass for the novel in which violence can be both necessary and morally right when it is required to destroy a cruel and oppressive regime. In Chapter Two of Ignite Me, Juliette, upon learning that her friends are (allegedly) all dead, vows to kill Anderson: “revenge/I think/has never looked so sweet” (12). Her plan will transform and evolve over the course of the novel to include aspirations for the greater good in addition to personal revenge. Juliette ultimately comes to believe that she should be the one not only leading the resistance against The Reestablishment, but also leading any future government established in the wake of The Reestablishment’s destruction. Mafi foreshadows Juliette’s emergence as a resistance leader in the novel’s early pages, when Juliette insists that she has always “known, deep down, [she] should be leading this resistance” given that she has “nothing left to lose and everything to gain” (26). While these qualifications change as Juliette learns her friends are alive, grows closer with Warner, and begins to find joy in her life despite difficult circumstances, the novel never wavers from its stance that Juliette’s plan to kill Anderson is, if not entirely moral, at least sufficiently justified.
The resulting implication is that Juliette’s motivations for killing Anderson are, if not immaterial, at least epiphenomenal to the fact that killing Anderson is a necessary step to overthrowing The Reestablishment. The novel does, however, waver somewhat on the logic of that necessity. Anderson is the emblematic “big bad” that denotes The Reestablishment’s power, imbued with apparent dictator-like status in the way his very name invokes fear in the citizens of Sector 45. He has nearly endless military resources at his disposal. Yet, at the same time, Castle reminds Juliette that Sector 45 is only one of 555 sectors within The Reestablishment’s control; Anderson is only one leader within the large group of The Reestablishment’s elites. The material effect of controlling this one sector and taking out this one leader, no matter the status he has been granted within the trilogy, may have limited effect in the larger scope of the revolution.
Even so, the novel does not present Juliette as being wrong to want to kill Anderson, no matter her reason for doing so. As Juliette asserts to the remaining Omega Point rebels as she claims the mantle of future leadership, “[They] can’t just sit back and watch people die when [they] have the power to make a difference” (134). Killing the leader of a violent regime is thus presented as a restoration of justice, a righteous act that begins to balance the scales of power back in favor of a long-oppressed people.
By Tahereh Mafi
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Diverse Voices (High School)
View Collection
Fantasy & Science Fiction Books (High...
View Collection
Friendship
View Collection
Religion & Spirituality
View Collection
Romance
View Collection
Valentine's Day Reads: The Theme of Love
View Collection
War
View Collection