logo

57 pages 1 hour read

Ingrid Rojas Contreras

Fruit of the Drunken Tree

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2018

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Character Analysis

Chula

The character of Chula is based on the author herself, and she is the novel’s protagonist and first-person narrator. The story follows her from ages seven to 15, and her narrative perspective is characterized by youthfulness, curiosity, and sensitivity. Chula’s narrative voice is deeply personal, emotionally driven, and rich in detail. Her emotional state comes across not only in what she expresses directly, but also in the pacing and structure of her sentences. Strikingly short sentences denote periods of depression, apathy, or boredom, while long, run-on, and ungrammatical sentences describe instances of agitation, overwhelm, or panic. Chula favors free indirect over direct narration. The text is thin on dialogue, and the reader rarely hears Chula’s “speaking” voice.

Chula is highly sensitive, and her empathy, curiosity, and vivid imagination inspire her to try to experience other people’s perspectives. For example, when Chula perceives the burden of responsibility that Petrona bears, she feels “sorry for Petrona” (18); when a girl Chula’s age is killed in a nearby car bombing, she effortfully imagines “what ceasing to exist would be like” (39). Chula even “sympathize[s] with Pablo Escobar’s family” when she hears that they are “begging for refugee status” (253) because it reminds her of her own family’s plight. Her sensitivity makes her more susceptible than Mamá or Cassandra to pangs of guilt and pity toward Petrona. This burden of empathy hinders Chula’s recovery from the trauma of fleeing Colombia.

Chula’s insatiable curiosity, paired with her sensitivity, causes her to become obsessed easily with people, words, and images she encounters. This compulsive tendency is most clearly evident in her instantaneous obsession with Petrona and her persistent fantasies about Pablo Escobar’s life, but also appears in her fixation on phrases she hears and images she sees. In the wake of the shooting of Galán, for example, Chula hears the radio newscaster use the phrase “fighting for his life,” and those words turn over in her head repeatedly for hours (72-75). Her thoughts likewise revisit striking images she has encountered, including the dead “girl’s shoe” (38), the cactus thorns that injure Abuela, and Pablo Escobar’s “sepulchral black, beady eyes” (246). Repetition and obsessive attention to detail are therefore defining characteristics of Chula’s narration. 

Petrona

Though Petrona’s voice occupies less of the text than Chula’s, her first-person perspective is critical. Her narrative style is different from Chula’s. For example, Petrona expresses herself indirectly, provides few details, and does not clearly betray her emotional state. The oblique quality of her narrative voice reveals her fear of knowing too much or saying too much, which are fears formed by her lived experience of loss and exploitation.

From the start of the novel, Petrona embodies the principle of silence as protection; silence is the strongest tool she has to protect herself and her loved ones. Because Petrona is responsible for her family as her family’s sole breadwinner, the reader can easily forget that she is 13 years old at the story’s beginning and 15 years old at the time of her assault. Petrona’s susceptibility to Gorrión reflects her inexperience as well as her emotionally starved state. Gorrión is Petrona’s first love, and he fulfills a deep-seeded need for care and attention; at the time at which they meet, Petrona’s family members are treating her exploitatively even though she is only a child.

Petrona’s narration employs a distinctive style for dialogue. Direct quotes are formatted in italics within unbroken narrative paragraphs. This unique formatting blends external dialogue into Petrona’s internal monologue, creating the impression that Petrona is locked in her own thoughts and cut off from the real world around her—a telltale symptom of trauma. 

Mamá

Mamá, like the author’s own mother, was raised in poverty and ascended to affluence. Her character embodies the uncomfortable cultural and socioeconomic differences between her past and her present. Mamá’s desire to hire a maid who reminds her of herself showcases her sense of obligation to help others overcome adversity as she did. Under the threat of danger, however, this benevolent urge clashes with Mamá’s impulse to protect herself and her family. When the kidnapping of her husband and the attempted kidnapping of her daughters test Mamá’s altruism, Mamá’s self-preservation instincts prevail.

Mamá’s decision to plant the poisonous Drunken Tree in the family’s front yard is evidence of her subversive nature. The tree’s presence discomfits her affluent neighbors, setting the Santiago household apart from others in their privileged community. The tree and its fruit, which can be weaponized, function paradoxically as both shield and threat: Mamá preserves it to intimidate and ward off others, but Chula notes, “we ourselves were afraid of it” (7). Mamá’s subversive nature is also evident in her affairs and flirtations with men other than her husband. These dalliances betray her discomfort in her domesticated role of upper-middle-class housewife and her urge to assert her own agency. Although Chula describes her home life as “a kingdom of women, with Mamá at the head” (7), the fact that the family depends on Papá’s financial support proves that Mamá and her daughters are not actually independent. 

Cassandra

The character of Cassandra is rendered through Chula’s perspective. Less complex than Chula, Cassandra serves primarily as a foil to Chula. In her displays of authority over Chula and occasional mild bullying, Cassandra plays the archetypal role of the big sister. Cassandra is Chula’s main sounding-board for musings, questions, and fantasies, and she offers confident answers and assurances even when she has no substantiating knowledge. She appoints herself as emissary between Chula and her parents, delivering the diagnosis that Chula is “traumatized” (77) and warning her that her parents might “find a psychologist who would do a pro bono” on her (117).

Cassandra’s air of authority blinds Chula to the foolishness of so many of her claims. Chula looks up to her older sister and follows her lead even when the risk of danger is grave, as when they secretly pursue Petrona and narrowly escape being kidnapped. Cassandra has less empathy than Chula, as demonstrated by their different coping strategies upon arriving to the United States. Chula shuts down emotionally while “Cassandra complie[s] perfectly and automatically with the rules of forgetting and moving on” (279). Living without empathy and sentimentality proves to be a winning strategy for Cassandra, who excels academically and professionally in her new life.

Gorrión

Gorrión is one of only two named male characters in the novel. He, like Papá, is rendered in broad and sketchy strokes. Gorrión and his love exert a powerful force over Petrona. Petrona is susceptible to his influence because he provides her with care and affection. Gorrión’s morality seems flimsy in contrast to Petrona’s careful grappling with her conscience. His expressions of his liberal politics sound halfhearted which suggests that his betrayal of Petrona to the violent left-wing guerrilla is motivated by fear and weakness rather than genuine ideological allegiance. Gorrión appears immature, self-centered, and manipulative when compared to Petrona, who is driven by devotion, responsibility, and prudence. 

Papá

Although Papá’s role in the novel is peripheral due to his absence for long stretches of time, he is crucial to the Santiagos’ family structure. The lives of Mamá and their daughters depend on his income, and his cool and erudite personality contrasts with Mamá’s fervid demeanor. Papá is confident in the face of fear and downplays suggestions of danger. When the family temporarily escapes Bogotá for El Salado, he comforts his daughters, boasting that “your papá can take the guerrillas” (90). As well, when the threat of guerrilla infiltration in his workplace first arises, he brushes off the suggestion. Papá’s hubris is punished when he is kidnapped and imprisoned for over six years.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text