logo

42 pages 1 hour read

Suzanne Simard

Finding the Mother Tree: Discovering the Wisdom of the Forest

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 2021

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 4-7Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 4 Summary: “Treed”

For her 23rd birthday, Simard and her friend Jean go hiking in mountainous British Columbia. Simard and Jean work for the Forest Service as ecologists cataloging the different plant and fungi species in the region. Simard is unsure if she wants to return to her seasonal job with the logging company, as she is “in love with forestry but furious at what [is] happening” with clear-cuts and quick growth schemes (65). As they hike, Jean tells Simard how the Coast Salish people believe in the personhood of trees and a network of cooperative fungi under the earth. Simard is startled to hear of such a legend, resolving to continue her own research into the topic.

Simard examines the roots of the grasses they pass and consults her field guide; the fungi on the grass roots are arbuscular mycorrhizas, mostly located within the roots, compared to the ectomycorrhizal fungi that live externally on some pine tree roots. The pair approach the subalpine section of the forest and notice grizzly bear scat. They continue, but when they reach a portion of the trail with fresh claw marks, they begin running back down the mountain. They find an abandoned cabin and camp there for the night.

The next morning, Jean notices a cached deer carcass that a bear has stored near their camp. They quickly pack their things and begin running back down the mountain but encounter a mother bear and her two cubs on the trail. Simard and Jean climb up nearby trees and wait out the bear. They climb down several hours later. On the hike back down, Simard contemplates how essential the pine forest has been not only to her own survival, but also to that of her entire community. She wants to be “a new breed of silviculturist who honor[s] this responsibility” (76). She resolves to find another way to work in the forest rather than with the capitalistic logging company.   

Chapter 5 Summary: “Killing Soil”

Simard hikes with her mother near the alpine Stein Valley. They reflect on the lichens and moss growing on the trees around them, with Simard’s mother remarking that “It just takes one plant to get going, then the others come along” (81). Simard is heartened by her mother’s steady, straightforward personality and the quiet patience of the forest.

Jean and Simard share an apartment in Kamloops. Jean suggests contacting Alan Vyse at the Forest Service for a silviculturist research position. Simard lands an interview with him; they discuss her experience with the clear-cuts of the logging company and her career goals. Alan hires her as a researcher the following February to monitor weeding effects in specific clear-cuts. Though it is not exactly what Simard wants to be researching, she is grateful for the experience. She hires her sister, Robyn, to work as her assistant.

When Simard and Robyn reach the Blue River clear-cuts, Simard worries about the ethics of the experiment: “I was in charge of an experiment that required me to kill plants, creating yet another type of displacement” (85). Under Alan’s guidance, Simard conducts an experiment that uses different amounts of the herbicide Roundup in places throughout the clear-cut to test the efficiency of the government’s “free-to-grow” policy, which eradicates all other plants around a pine seedling. Wearing protective equipment, Simard and Robyn spray the Roundup and wait a month to measure growth rates. The highest dose of Roundup results in the most non-competitive free-to-grow space.

Simard is contracted to design another weeding experiment for free-to-grow policies, which she considers to be an “all-out war on native plants and broadleaf trees” (91). She is soon offered a permanent position at the Forest Service with Alan as her supervisor. She receives a grant to study the relationship between birch trees, conifers, and mycorrhizal fungi; she hopes to prove that birch trees contribute to the conifers’ growth and should be considered more than weeds. Simard has to replant over the course of five years, until the fifth iteration of the experiment includes a transfer of soil rich in fungi. The transplanted soil significantly contributes to plant growth. Simard must accept the responsibility of standing up to the policymakers, sharing her research, and hopefully stopping the incessant spraying of pesticides and herbicides that are killing the forest. Simard enrolls in graduate school at Oregon State University.

Chapter 6 Summary: “Alder Swales”

Simard begins an experiment for her master’s degree to test whether alder is truly the “pine killer” policymakers have labeled it. With Robyn’s help, she conducts the experiment in an old clear-cut full of Sitka alders. Simard hopes to discover that the alders cooperate instead of compete with pines. A group of prisoners is briefly assigned to help set up the experiment, but the guards must transport them back to the prison when a fight breaks out. Simard enlists the rest of her family as research assistants. She also enlists Don, a research assistant that Simard met at Oregon State and with whom she has just begun a relationship. Over the course of several weeks, Simard and her family monitor the resources and soil in the clear-cut. One task uses a radioactive neutron probe to test for water in the soil, and Simard and Robyn are briefly exposed to radioactivity. Preliminary results from the experiment suggest that alders do take most of the water from the soil; next, Simard must compare water resources in middle and late August. In doing so, she discovers that the alder is actually helping to reroute groundwater and remove water stress on the pines, as well as providing the pines with necessary nitrogen.

Simard returns to Oregon State and moves in with Don. They each pursue graduate work, with Simard needing to convince policymakers of the benefits of alder for pine growth. Her main issue is securing enough evidence; the seedlings she has planted will need decades to grow to full maturity. Through further research, she begins to hypothesize that mycorrhizal fungi are responsible for the nitrogen transfer between alder and pine. Don advises her to prepare for public speaking and conferences if she wants to convince policymakers away from their capitalistic practices. Simard completes her master’s degree. She and Don move to Canada and get married when she is 29 years old.

Chapter 7 Summary: “Bar Fight”

Four years later, Simard is a doctoral student attending a conference to present her research on alder and pine cooperation. She is frightened of public speaking and is speaking to an audience that mostly supports the use of Roundup and other toxic herbicides. As Simard presents her research, she notes the policymakers in the audience looking increasingly annoyed with her. Simard continues despite several men leaving the audience and others talking through her speech. She proposes a long-term view of forest conservation rather than the “short-term growth gains” that profit the policymakers most (133). She notes that the foresters in the audience seem grateful to hear that her results “matched some of what they were seeing in the bush” (135). After the conference, Simard and Jean meet up with Kelly at a local bar.

Simard is upset about the reception of her research and feels particularly insecure about her status as a woman in the scientific research community. Both she and Kelly drink heavily. They toast to Kelly’s wife’s newly announced pregnancy. When Kelly makes an offhand, misogynistic comment, Simard is deeply hurt. The two argue loudly, with Simard defending a woman’s right to be more than a housewife and mother, as Kelly advocates. Simard leaves the bar furious with her brother.

Chapters 4-7 Analysis

As Simard becomes more established in the academic forestry community, she begins to act more confidently in accordance with her ethics and love for nature. At the center of her motivation is her desire to replicate her family’s mindful hand-falling practices in a large-scale way that will both appease policymakers and keep the forests healthy.

At the beginning of Simard’s studies, she can’t always adhere to her moral code while also advancing in her field. In order to gain experience conducting scientific research, Simard must begin by conducting weeding experiments under the direction of Alan Vyse, briefly compromising her ethics in order to further her career path: “I felt one step closer to having the skills to solve the puzzle of my little yellow seedlings” (87). She must learn how to be a scientist and researcher before she can change the industry and its policies. The need for patience again finds a parallel in nature; the trees Simard most wants to study require decades to grow, and any investigation of their cooperative nature must be similarly long-term. Yet Simard’s experiment with the alder and pine makes it clear she can wait to ensure she’s seeing the complete picture. However, policymakers are often less willing to postpone action (especially profitable action) until the results of a lengthy study come in.

When Simard is finally able to conduct her own graduate student experiments and prove that the soil and mycorrhizal cooperative fungal networks are essential for pine growth, she must face the gendered biases of the policymakers. She exhibits personal growth in working on her public speaking skills so she can present her research findings at a conference, but most of the influential men working in the field fail to support her. Simard sets the stage for her experience of the conference by describing its setting: a “cowboy town” where the airport features photos of “leathery cowboys risking their lives riding bareback on bulls and broncos, next to pictures of men who’d died too young working the rivers and land for gold, fur, and cattle” (128). Besides being male-dominated, the images depict an extractive relationship to nature that is ultimately self-destructive. Simard encounters a similar attitude while giving her paper, even as she tries to calibrate her performance for her mostly male audience; she refrains from making a quip about plucking one’s eyebrows, noting that it wasn’t “an analogy [she] could share at this conference” (133).

Fresh from this experience, Kelly’s misogynistic comments and patriarchal views of women’s roles are too much for Simard to take. Her argument with him allows Simard to comment on the widespread nature of gendered bias. She must combat sexism not only academically and professionally but also personally. The argument also underscores the implicit connection between the skepticism Simard faces as a woman and the skepticism she faces as someone challenging the conventional view of nature. Although Simard’s own family has long had a cooperative relationship with the land, her brother isn’t immune to the more “competitive” understanding of nature, talking about how steers “control” the females in their herd. This is the same, masculine-coded worldview that Simard continuously runs up against professionally:

The irony of the bar fight is that it slammed up against the very question I had been pursuing in my doctoral dissertation about collaboration in nature. […] We emphasize domination and competition in the management of trees in forests. And crops in agricultural fields. And stock animals on farms (140).

Though her focus is on changing the capitalistic goals of policymakers, in doing so Simard is also challenging the intertwined problem of patriarchy, highlighting the theme of Feminism, Scientific Research, and Legacy.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text