43 pages • 1 hour read
Olga TokarczukA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
The novel repeatedly focuses on the value of life by asking which lives matter. On this subject, Janina stands in opposition to the traditional values of her culture. Most people don’t consider the source of the meat they eat and that an animal was slaughtered to provide it. They don’t think about the fur coats that keep them warm or the animals that suffer in cages before being skinned. Even pet animals like dogs or cats become prey if they stray onto a hunter’s property.
The powers that be in Janina’s little village favor human life over all other species. In addition, they have allied themselves with one another to reinforce the notion of human dominance by engaging in the practice of sport hunting. The commandant represents the power of the law. Innerd represents the power of wealth. The president represents the power of politics, and Father Rustle represents the power of the church. Each man benefits in some way from conspiring with the rest. To them, value is reckoned in personal benefit. An animal may be valuable for its fur or its meat, but its life has no intrinsic worth other than what can be extracted for human use. Janina sees this power dynamic at play in the photograph that displays her dead pets. She says,
If not for the corpses lying at their feet, one might have thought these people were celebrating a happy event, so self-satisfied did they look. […] The masculine odor of tanned hide, oiled shotguns, alcohol and sweat. Gestures of domination, insignia of power (254).
To the hunters, dead animals symbolize their superiority—their dominion over nature. This perception is diametrically opposed to Janina’s. To her, all lives have value. All living creatures have souls. She is as upset by the murder of a deer as she would be at the murder of a human child. At one point in the story, she can’t contain her outrage against the society that fails to assign a spiritual value to animal life. Her choice of language as she berates a policeman is particularly telling:
What sort of a world is this? Someone’s body is made into shoes, into meatballs, sausages, a bedside rug, someone’s bones are boiled to make broth...Shoes, sofas, a shoulder bag made of someone’s belly, keeping warm with someone else’s fur, eating someone’s body, cutting it into bits and frying it in oil...Can it really be true? Is this nightmare really happening? This mass killing, cruel, impassive, automatic, without any pangs of conscience (106-07).
Janina does not say “something” is made into shoes. She says, “somebody.” She accords respect to her fellow creatures by speaking of them in human terms. To her, the value of an animal lies in its very existence, not the price that can be assigned to its various dismembered parts.
Janina declares that she is an atheist, yet her belief in astrology implies that she sees an orderly cosmos in which the action of a distant star can influence human affairs. This means that connections must exist everywhere. Perhaps her atheism simply rejects the hypocritical religiosity displayed by Father Rustle.
Because Janina sees connections everywhere, she is quick to receive and interpret the mandate from the deer that she should become their avenging angel. Seeing a deer bone stuck in Big Foot’s throat leads her to form an immediate connection between the deer standing outside his cottage door and a cosmic message meant for her ears alone.
Her belief in unseen connections also allows Janina to form an attachment to creatures that are generally dismissed as unimportant in human affairs. If everything is connected, then all forms of life are connected. Her views don’t merely create camaraderie between humans and animals but a commonality that amounts to kinship in the grand scheme of things. When viewed in this way, Janina’s execution of the hunters makes perfect sense. A human acting to protect a family member from harm would be perceived as reasonable. Because humans in Janina’s culture have separated themselves from and elevated themselves above the rest of nature, they fail to see the connections that are so painfully apparent to her.
Janina is a modern-day mystic who perceives connections among all the various parts of creation. Perhaps, she was born in the wrong century. A medieval village might have understood her perspective better. In her unintentionally humorous letter to the police, she cites case after case in which earlier law courts tried to bring animals to trial:
The most famous trial took place in France, in 1521. It was the trial of some Rats, which had been causing a lot of destruction. They were summoned to court by the townsfolk and were appointed a public defense counsel (190).
That such cases exist suggests a significant shift in people’s perception of nature. At one time, the hand of Providence could be seen in the actions of rats. The Newtonian clockwork universe deprived humanity of a sense of the connectedness of all creation so that bringing rats to trial would seem absurd to the modern mind. Because Janina isn’t influenced by Enlightenment rationalism, she still sees the connections and is perfectly willing to bring human rats to trial and execute them for their crimes.
Janina is an eccentric by the standards of her community. She is a vegetarian and an atheist. She believes that astrology dictates the actions of human beings. Most of all, she believes in the sanctity of all forms of life and that hunting is murder. Everyone else in Janina’s immediate circle is equally odd in different ways.
Obviously, Janina’s closest neighbor belongs in this category since she christened him Oddball. His real name is a tongue-twister in the Polish language. Oddball hardly ever speaks and suffers from what Janina comically calls testosterone autism. Similarly, Dizzy is a fish out of water at the conservative police station where he works. He is physically delicate and emotionally sensitive. His greatest joy is translating Blake’s writings into Polish. Most ordinary people would call him a sissy, and even Janina says that he is scatterbrained. Good News is also an oddity. She can’t grow hair anywhere on her body and needs to draw her eyebrows daily with a cosmetic pencil. Even Boros, who is only passing through, is obsessed with protecting an obscure beetle species from extinction.
This collection of characters is dismissed by everyone else in the village. Oddball’s son, the policeman, is patronizing toward his father and mirrors the citizenry’s attitude as a whole. Because nobody can relate to this odd group of characters, they are perceived as useless. Janina is painfully aware of how the community views her and her friends. She says:
But why should we have to be useful and for what reason? Who divided the world into useless and useful, and by what right? Does a thistle have no right to life, or a Mouse that eats the grain in a warehouse? […] Whose intellect can have had the audacity to judge who is better, and who worse? A large tree, crooked and full of holes, survives for centuries without being cut down, because nothing could possibly be made out of it. This example should raise the spirits of people like us. Everyone knows the profit to be reaped from the useful, but nobody knows the benefit to be gained from the useless (248).
Janina may not be aware of the value of the useless, but they serve an essential communal function, nonetheless. Outsiders can see patterns and trends that aren’t apparent to the mainstream because they aren’t immersed in the culture. They are alienated from it. They can hold up a mirror to society and show people what they fail to see about themselves and their world. In that regard, the useless folk may be the most useful.
By Olga Tokarczuk
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Earth Day
View Collection
Horror, Thrillers, & Suspense
View Collection
Mystery & Crime
View Collection
National Book Awards Winners & Finalists
View Collection
Nobel Laureates in Literature
View Collection
Revenge
View Collection
Satire
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection
The Booker Prizes Awardees & Honorees
View Collection