69 pages • 2 hours read
Heather Cox RichardsonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Richardson describes how Donald Trump used business and reality television to manufacture an image of himself as “the Republican success story” (86). Trump “married Republican politics to authoritarianism” (87): a strict hierarchy of people in which he was the “best.” This rise paralleled authoritarianism in countries such as Russia, where Vladimir Putin long wanted to overturn the liberal consensus and interfere with the United States’ attempt to globalize democracy.
In campaign rallies, Trump made “outrageous statements that reporters felt obliged to cover” (92), resulting in twice the media coverage of his Democratic opponent, Hilary Clinton. Trump won the Electoral College and presidency, though he lost the popular vote by almost three million. His inauguration speech described the country as a place of utter “carnage” and positioned himself as the only person who could fix it.
Prior to 2016, Republicans used divisive rhetoric and pointed attacks toward opponents to establish an “oligarchy,” not to create governmental “apocalypse.” In doing so, however, they unwittingly set the stage for someone to step into authoritarianism. Trump echoed “flat-out lie[s]” and “easily disprovable statements” the press would inevitably cover (95). Trump advisor Kellyanne Conway’s infamous statement that such lies were “alternative facts” revealed that Trump’s lies were not just inconsequential statements, but a manipulative rhetorical strategy called “gaslighting.” The constant fight to defend reality, or to determine what reality is, is an authoritarian technique meant “to destabilize a population” (97). Trump started using other authoritarian tactics, like banning people from majority-Muslim countries from traveling to the country, firing those who criticized him, and beginning to separate children of refugees from their parents at the US–Mexico border. Republicans who opposed Trump were “excluded” from halls of executive power, creating a “vacuum” that left “cronies” in the White House.
A 2017 report released by James Clapper revealed that Russia had “interfered” in the 2016 election to help Trump: Two years of subsequent investigations found that Trump’s campaign had “played along.” In 2016, Paul Manafort, who owed millions to Russian oligarchs, became an advisor to the Trump campaign and established meetings between the campaign and Russian operatives, who flooded social media with false information and funneled “dirt” on Hilary Clinton to Trump’s campaign.
Trump “purged” officials investigating his team’s relationship with Russia, such as FBI director James Comey, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coates, and Attorney General Jeff Sessions. He positioned himself as an innocent victim of a “witch hunt.” While Robert Mueller’s report eventually confirmed Russian interference and said Trump’s campaign “expected it would benefit” from this interference, Trump’s team spread disinformation that they were exonerated, even though “thirty-four people and three companies were indicted or pleaded guilty in the attack on the 2016 election and its cover-up” (107).
Trump’s growing authoritarianism emboldened “right-wing gangs” (109), who met at the “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, North Carolina, on August 11, 2017. This was the newest in a long string of far-right protests spanning from anti-New Deal violence in the 1930s, a standoff between neo-Nazis and officials at Ruby Ridge in 1992, right-wing violence after the Waco siege in 1993, the armed defense of a tax evader by the Oath Keepers in 2014, and the 2016 right-wing takeover over Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. The 2017 “Unite the Right” group was the newest racist, anti-government outcropping of such violence. However, this time, this violence was endorsed by the sitting president, when Trump called them “very fine people” (114).
In 2019, news broke that Trump promised he would release Congress-approved money to the new Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky if Zelensky agreed to announce an investigation of Hunter Biden, the son of Trump’s 2020 opponent Joe Biden. After Trump began directly pressuring Zelensky, a whistleblower on staff reported that Trump was pressuring foreign governments to influence the election to help him stay in power. On December 18, 2019, the House voted to impeach Trump, and in January, his trial in the Senate began. Senate Republicans rallied behind Trump, saying the impeachment was a strategy to flip the Senate. Though House member Adam Schiff warned Republican senators that Trump would continue to compromise elections and national security, the Senate acquitted him. Republican Senator Mitt Romney was the only Republican who voted to impeach. The Democratic senators plus Romney “represented eighteen million more Americans than the fifty-two Republicans who voted to acquit” (122), demonstrating how Republicans shored up power by “repressing the majority” (122).
One of the hallmarks of the Trump presidency was nepotism, as he “replac[ed] career professionals with family members and friends” (124). He hired his daughter Ivanka and her husband, Jared Kushner, to be unpaid senior advisors in charge of important international affairs. This troubled a former democratic pillar that stated a government bureaucracy should be loyal to the state rather than its leader.
Trump positioned any civil servant participating in the investigation of him as a “Democrat who wanted to hound him from office” (125). In late spring of 2020, Trump fired the inspectors general of the Departments of Defense, Health and Human Services, Transportation, and the State Department and Intelligence Community, replacing them with “more compliant” figures. In speeches, Trump drew on the image of “the cowboy who saves the villagers by destruction” (126), depicting himself as the savior of a country on the verge of catastrophe. He spun stories about the supposed successes of his administration like he’d run his reality show: “false, scripted, and effective” (126). The appeal to improving individual lives shored up a base so devoted that it became “Trump’s party,” and no Republican could “cross him.”
A political scientist and expert on authoritarianism at Politico reports that authoritarianism “is best understood not as a policy preference [...] but rather as a worldview that can be ‘activated’ in the right historical moment by anyone with a big enough megaphone who is willing to play on voters’ fears and insecurities” (MacWilliams, Matthew C. “Trump Is an Authoritarian. So Are Millions of Americans.” Politico, 2020). In Part 1, Richardson outlines how this activation began. These first six chapters of Part 2 examine how Trump “married Republican politics to authoritarianism” (87), starting with his 2016 campaign and moving through his methods of “destabilizing” the government in the lead-up to the domestic turmoil that characterized the last three quarters of 2020. One of Richardson’s central ideas in these chapters is that Trump fulfilled a potential created by previous generations of Republicans to court the votes of evangelicals and Movement Conservatives. Though their political machinations created the potential for a leader like Trump and primed a base of “extremists,” Richardson proposes that prior to 2016, Republicans never enacted this “extremism” into law. However, because of Trump’s “authoritarian” strategies, over the years they either fell into line with him to keep power or were ejected from their party.
Richardson focuses on several primary authoritarian tactics evident through Trump’s campaign and the first years of his presidency, some of which have precedent in previous administrations and some of which were new. Like his predecessors, Trump strategically manipulated the media, stood behind easily disproved lies, and banned people from countries he rhetorically positioned as enemies. However, some of his tactics that Richardson identifies as authoritarian were unprecedented, like stacking professional governmental roles with unqualified friends and family members to cut down on dissent, openly sympathizing with hate groups after Charlottesville, and working with foreign governments to affect the outcome of a democratic election.
One authoritarian tactic Richardson identifies is how Trump employed the media to further The Use of False History to Manipulate Ideology. Trump made “outrageous statements” in order to get increased media coverage, but reporters wouldn’t always explain “their content of truthfulness” and ended up passing along these statements uncritically (92). These falsehoods cemented together a group of followers driven more by emotion than fact, who “believed they were part of a heroic mission to return to the nation to what he told them were its true rules and patterns” (94). This was a continuation of Nixon’s and Reagan’s ideological separation of Americans into “good” and “bad” categories. On the “bad” side were often non-white, non-Christian people: Richardson says Trump immediately started “destabilizing the government to push an authoritarian agenda” by putting a travel ban on people from “primarily Muslim countries” (97).
Government employees’ reactions to such actions became a litmus test. Anyone who pushed back was fired, including people like Acting Attorney General Sally Yates, who “refused to defend the [travel] ban” (98), FBI Director James Comey, who refused to drop an investigation of Trump’s former advisor Michael Flynn on Trump’s demand, Attorney General Jeff Sessions over his investigation into the Trump campaign’s involvement with Russia’s interference into the 2016 election, and witnesses to Trump’s attempted blackmail of Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky. In their stead, he often instated “loyalists” and family members who were “unelected and unqualified” (124), which “eroded one of the key pillars of democratic government: a bureaucracy loyal not to a leader but to the state itself” (124). Richardson describes how Nixon and Reagan also used rhetoric that conflated loyalty to their person with loyalty to the country, but Trump’s strategic firing and hiring actively created a government that was primarily loyal to him. Consequently, the Republican Party became “Trump’s Party,” as other Republican politicians fell into line with these talking points, erasing another layer of governmental accountability—a point that becomes increasingly important as Richardson discusses the reaction to the 2020 election in the latter part of Part 2.
American Literature
View Collection
Books on U.S. History
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Contemporary Books on Social Justice
View Collection
Essays & Speeches
View Collection
Nation & Nationalism
View Collection
Political Science Texts
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Power
View Collection