logo

45 pages 1 hour read

Antjie Krog

Country of My Skull: Guilt, Sorrow, and the Limits of Forgiveness in the New South Africa

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1998

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Symbols & Motifs

Antagonism Towards Non-South Africans

Throughout Country of My Skull, Krog periodically mentions intrusions by non-South African politicians and journalists, which she always does with a tone of disgust, frustration, and protectiveness towards her home country. She describes foreign journalists at the beginning of the TRC process as only caring about whether any major politicians would be giving testimony, suggesting that they do not care about the testimonies of actual victims and are only looking for a sensational story for their own home press. When more foreign journalists arrive as the process continues, Krog wonders: “Because they are particularly interested in the victims of apartheid? No, because for the first time politicians and political parties are making submissions before the commission” (131).  

As the TRC process wears on, Krog’s distaste for foreign journalists increases. She disdains them for descending on the process when they think it relevant, as opposed to slogging through the entire process from start to finish, as the South African journalists do. Krog feels offended at what she perceives to be a lack of caring about the truth of South Africa, and that the foreign journalists cannot adequately understand or interpret the information they receive because they lack context.

Systemic Misogyny

While Krog focuses predominantly on racism and racial biases before, during, and after apartheid, she also frequently points out gender biases ingrained in South African culture at every level of society, regardless of race. Starting with the selection of the TRC, Krog notes that the commission asks potential female candidates if women should be on the commission, whereas men do not receive the same treatment. She also observes that some detractors are unhappy “over the absence of colored people on the list” (27), but that one of the women is colored, concluding, “Yes, yes, but everybody knows ‘people’ means ‘men’” (27).

Women’s second-class status helps Krog highlight how remarkable it is that the “sound” of the first narrative, i.e. the victims, is clearly female, as mothers and wives talk about the suffering they have endured in losing sons and husbands. Krog reinforces her observations about gender in Chapter 16, which focuses exclusively on black women and their experience with sexual violence. Rape is frequently employed as a way of subjugating women by using their sex against them, turning their own bodies into a “battleground.” Even the Afrikaans language contains inherent racism, as Krog’s friend observes: “The most despicable behavior, cowardice, and loss of control, we have equated with the actions of a black woman” (250).

Black Unity

Race is a primary theme of Country of My Skull, particularly the discussion of black versus white. However, a less prominent but no less important discussion takes place around black unity. Archbishop Tutu believes “that black people have access almost to a superior humanity, which enables them to do things that surpass cold logic” (145). He insists that black people have an underlying sense of unity and community that transcends all else, and many seem to agree with him. Even those who may not directly agree with him take the stance that black people must stick together, even if they disagree, because standing unified against white oppression is more important than any grievance they might have among themselves.

However, some blacks do not feel the same way; most notably, blacks victimized by other blacks during the worst parts of the fighting against apartheid. One of the black political parties, the IFP, goes so far as to generate a memo accusing the ANC of using the TRC for its own personal goals of trying to give themselves a privileged place over other antiapartheid forces. The memo states that the ANC “killed far more IFP members than the supporters of apartheid ever did” (133).

Truth

Krog repeatedly raises questions about truth in the text—what it means, whether it matters, and if it is subjective. While she draws no firm conclusions, Krog suggests that perhaps both absolute and personal, subjective truth exist, and that in this case, the subjective one may be more important. With the help of psychologists who explain potential motivations of the victims and perpetrators, Krog learns that truth means different things to different people and that one’s experience heavily influences what one perceives as true. She goes so far as to declare for herself that her own truth is what matters to her, and that she is trying to make sense of a confusing world in owning her truth. Krog also believes that the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s strengths lie in its ability to uncover truth, not to dispense justice. 

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text