logo

51 pages 1 hour read

E. L. Doctorow

City of God

Fiction | Novel | Adult

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Pages 47-92Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Pages 47-53 Summary

Everett hears from Tom Pemberton and meets him for drinks. Tom has read Everett’s story about him so far, and he takes issue with any author’s ability to render life accurately, noting that facts are wrong as well as his motivations for getting in trouble with church leadership. Tom has not left the church, but he’s been reassigned to a hospice ward. He reveals that he got in trouble because he asked what possible response Christianity could offer to the Holocaust.

Everett keeps thinking of his affair with Moira as a movie plot, and in it, the main character undergoes plastic surgery to resemble his mistress’s husband. Together, he and the mistress usurp the husband’s life, calling the police on the husband when he arrives at his own home. Everett conflates his narrative and his own life, realizing that the only thing to do with all that power would be to leave the woman, as well, thereby ruining everyone’s lives but his own.

After a brief contemplation of crows on the dock, Everett returns to his imagined Einstein monologue, who holds up the bending of starlight as a religious sacrament. Concerned with Tom’s protests against his story and perhaps moved by his argument to church leadership, Everett pivots to another fiction: a retelling of Sarah Blumenthal’s father’s experience in a Jewish ghetto (modeled on Kovno, Lithuania) during World War II. Though it is not clear at this point in the story, Everett has grown close to Sarah, and her husband Joshua has died after an anonymous beating that occurred in Europe while he was searching for a diary that is a key factor in Sarah’s father’s story.

Pages 54-74 Summary

From this point, the ghetto story becomes the dominant narrative of the novel until Everett finishes writing it. Sarah’s father, who earns the name Yehoshua in the course of his story, relates in first person his time as a runner delivering messages throughout the ghetto. He is only ten, but he is well aware of the cruelties of the German soldiers, and he hopes that his parents are alive with the resistance living in the wilderness to the east while knowing in his heart that they were killed by Germans. His mother and father were both academics and deeply in love, and when they were moved to the ghetto, they became day laborers like most everyone else. His father served on the Jewish council (which was tasked with working with the German occupation but mostly served as a group of powerless functionaries) until the Germans burned down the Jewish hospital. Schmitz, the chief S.S. officer, is a particularly cruel man, and Yehoshua’s father could not stand to make formal complaints against such evil.

Yehoshua does not know exactly what happened, but one day, his parents did not return home. He knows that there was a call for educated Jews to participate in an archival project and that those Jews were trucked out of the city and murdered, but he does not know if his parents volunteered or were forced, so he chooses to believe that they may have escaped to the resistance.

After his parents’ disappearance, a rabbi takes in Yehoshua and gives him his new name and identity; he is given papers and led to an old man’s home. That man, Srebnitsky, is a tailor who treats Yehoshua with indifference. Yehoshua soon realizes that the identity he has been given is the man’s dead grandson, and his daughter and son-in-law were also killed. Srebnitsky only has one book in his house, the Bible, and when he sees Yehoshua reading it, he tells him to look closely, as it’s riddled with hypocrisy and fiction—to really know what kind of God exists, Yehoshua must consider everything, including the Nazis.

There is a brief intervention into this narrative of Tom’s remarks to the bishop’s examiners, where he puts forth the same doubts as Srebnitsky: The Bible was written by storytellers, and concluding that they got it down correctly and fully is going against the evidence of the rational mind.

Srebnitsky is ordered to create a new uniform for S.S. Major Schmitz, and he has no choice but to accept, and Yehoshua learns that Srebnitsky’s family was beaten to death by Germans before the ghettos were established. Yehoshua reveals in his narration that the uniform will lead to Srebnitsky’s death as well, and the narrative transitions back into Tom’s remarks. He believes that the Jesus of Christianity has become a political entity, and that his desire is to pursue a more intellectual pursuit of religion divorced from doctrinal law. He is aware that this might be cause to expunge him from the church. This is followed by another midrash of a jazz standard, “Star Dust,” comparing the ending of a relationship to the fall from grace of Adam and Eve.

Pages 75-92 Summary

Schmitz arrives to collect his uniform from Srebnitsky, and Yehoshua watches from across the street. When Schmitz, wearing his new uniform, refuses to pay, Srebnitsky slashes the uniform with a pair of scissors. Schmitz’s driver beats Srebnitsky, and Yehoshua runs away to the Jewish council. Rumors abound about retaliation from the Germans, but Dr. Koenig, the president of the council, calms everyone down.

The people of the ghetto are ordered to build a gallows and assemble at dawn. Mr. Barbanel, another council member, conscripts Yehoshua into his group of young runners, putting him in the custody of the council. From this new post, Yehoshua gets to know the morally ambiguous work the council engages in, bargaining with the German authorities in “a brutal calculus of bodies and work and food” (80).

At his execution, Srebnitsky seems strangely proud of the effort put into making an example of him, and Yehoshua thinks about his sacrifice—he could have murdered Schmitz but chose instead to disrespect him, knowing that Schmitz’s murder would have been disastrous for the ghetto. When a rabbi tries to cut down Srebnitsky’s body, he is shot dead by a German soldier.

The narrative turns back to the resolution of Everett’s movie plot. The usurper murders the husband, and using skills he learned in a jungle, he shrinks the husbands decapitated head and presents it to the wife as a gift. Before the wife commits suicide, she calls the police, and the usurper (still believed to be the husband) is put on trial for killing himself. Everett’s narrative is pure melodrama, and he admits that, just like a sociopath who must escalate his crimes, the author must pursue his idea to the end.

Everett then begins writing in the voice of Wittgenstein, using the numbered system the philosopher often employed in his writing. Wittgenstein admits that even if all scientific questions were answered, “our problem is still not touched at all” (87).

Tom and Everett meet for drinks, and they discuss the detective manuscript and Tom’s own fate. He is still part of the church, and it still bears some significance in his life, primarily because he still prays. They start talking about the stolen crucifix, then turn to the nature of stories in the Bible. Tom admits that the authors of the Bible were great storytellers, which means that the Bible was composed; this is no trouble for a nonbeliever, but to Tom, it’s always been troubling. He sees the Bible as a way of ordering thought, and the advances in science and philosophy in the interim have opened it up to reinterpretation. Tom then admits that despite his shaken faith, he thinks the crucifix being placed above Joshua and Sarah’s synagogue is a sign.

Pages 47-92 Analysis

The introduction of the real Tom Pemberton completely supplants the hardboiled version of him that Everett was writing, in part because of Pem’s own criticisms of Everett’s portrayal of his life so far. This will happen several times going forward: Everett will write his way into an idea, the idea will but up against the actuality he was trying to represent, and he will abandon the project or shift his scope in reaction, which is what he does by transitioning into writing of Sarah Blumenthal’s father (and will do again when Sarah reads his work). The novel is calling attention to fiction as a constructed medium, but this is not intended as a criticism of narrative; by placing the act of construction in a character who is clearly searching for meaning, the novel posits that writing fiction is another version of Thomas Pemberton’s quest for religious and moral understanding in a rational universe.

This is a key component of metafiction, which is fiction that is overtly self-referential to its being composed or is otherwise focused on the act of creating narrative. Everett is a stand-in for Doctorow but is not overtly autobiographical; rather, he represents the difficulty and struggle to make something significant. For Everett, the reaction of Thomas Pemberton to his work is a sign that he has failed, and he takes Pem’s mention of the Holocaust as a cue for where he went wrong. In looking for the truth in his friend’s story, he missed that his friend’s truth is rooted in other, larger stories.

The ghetto narrative that Everett turns to reads as a more accurate portrayal of a life because it strips away the genre convention and does not flatten Yehoshua’s complicated character in the same way as Everett did with Pem. There is a clear parallel between Everett’s writing and Yehoshua’s dual belief in his parents’ fate: their being alive is the story he tells himself so he can have the strength to go on, and the novel is making it clearer that Everett’s quest for meaning through fiction writing is tied up in Pem’s quest to figure out how to go forward as a believer in God. In other words, everyone in the novel is looking for an answer to why they are suffering (it is worth remembering that “everyone” in this context is seen through Everett’s lens).

Trying to make sense of the Holocaust is a common motif in religious studies in the 20th century. The story Everett writes based on Sarah Blumenthal’s father’s history is filled with horror and unbelievable cruelties addressed in matter-of-fact style, and the Jewish people living in the ghetto have had their humanity taken from them piece by piece. The Jewish council is in an impossible position of negotiating with the Nazis who wish them dead, and so the ghetto is inherently a place of bitter moral compromise and failure; this is made most clear in the character of Srebnitsky, whose tragic fate is rooted in his attempt to assert his own humanity from a position of absolute abasement.

The impositions and overlaps of other narratives that break up the ghetto story all address the central problem of the novel in one way or another: The story of Everett’s affair, based on his real indiscretion, comments on the relationship between desire, power, and evil; his writing from Wittgenstein’s point of view tries to make order out of a chaotic, amoral universe; the midrash of “Star Dust” becomes an exploration of humanity’s fall from grace; Pem and Everett’s conversation reiterates that there must be some meaning in the theft of the cross from Pem’s church. Each of these pieces is linked to the Holocaust narrative in that they’re trying to understand how to go forward in the face of an evil so large as to be incomprehensible, and the implication is that the only way to do it is in the messy, tangential way the novel is unfolding; as Wittgenstein says, “even if all the possible scientific questions are answered, our problem is still not touched at all” (87).

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text