29 pages • 58 minutes read
Winston ChurchillA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Hypophora is a device whereby the speaker asks a question, only to immediately answer it themselves. It is distinct from a rhetorical question, in that rhetorical questions do not require a response. Hypophora is a common technique in political speeches, as it strengthens the speaker’s argument by showing that they have anticipated potential objections or questions and can confidently deal with them.
Churchill uses two notable instances of hypophora in Paragraph 6: “You ask, what is our policy? I can say: It is to wage war […] That is our policy” and “You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word: It is victory.” In both instances, the hypophora sets up a topic that is then dealt with definitively in the answer (or anthypophora), and this repetitive structure gives emphasis to the important subjects of aim and policy. It also creates an impression of authority and reliability on Churchill’s part, making him seem like a trustworthy leader with well thought-out plans. Additionally, Churchill ascribes his questions to the audience by using the second person “you ask” so that his responses gives the impression of directly allaying the audience’s fears.
Diacope is a type of repetition wherein select words or phrases are repeated, with each instance separated by a small number of intervening words. This technique emphasizes the repeated words, making them more memorable and thought-provoking to the audience.
One example of diacope in Paragraph 6 is “without victory, there is no survival. Let that be realized; no survival for the British Empire, no survival for all that the British Empire has stood for, no survival for the urge and impulse of the ages.” In this case, the phrase “no survival” is repeated four times in quick succession. The repetition and emphasis creates a sense of rhythm and musicality to the speech, which makes the language more memorable and persuasive. The use of diacope also builds a sense of urgency, as the consequences listed seem to build on each other with each repetition. This intensification works to persuade the audience of The Necessity of War by eliciting an emotional response of fear in reaction to the looming threat of defeat.
Pathos is an appeal to emotion that aims to elicit sympathy in the audience. It is one of Aristotle’s three pillars of rhetoric that, along with logos and ethos, form the foundations of persuasive writing. Churchill, with his classical education and sophisticated rhetorical skills, makes full use of all three methods of persuasion in his speechwriting.
In “Blood, Toil, Tears and Sweat,” Churchill uses pathos to stir the emotions of his listeners in order to persuade them to support his leadership and the war effort. His appeals to natural unity throughout the speech inspire pathos by creating a sense of community and collective identity for the people of Britain. Additionally, Churchill presents himself as a sympathetic figure with “nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat.” This vivid imagery implies that Churchill’s leadership is motivated by an all-consuming dedication to duty rather than any personal interest and preemptively defangs any potential criticism directed toward him. He also repeats the phrase “I hope” while addressing the audience in the second person, which makes it seem as though his heartfelt pleas for support and clemency are being made directly to the listener, creating further sympathy.
Churchill makes frequent use of allusion, which is the indirect evocation of events and people without naming them specifically. This device allows him to focus on efficiently putting forth an effective argument without getting bogged down in the distracting or lengthy minutiae of current events that are already common knowledge. It also makes it more difficult for detractors to disagree with or criticize Churchill than if he were making specific refutable references to particulars. For example, Churchill apologizes for “any lack of ceremony” with which he has acted without listing specific offenses (Paragraph 5). He also refers to the enemy as “a monstrous tyranny” (Paragraph 6), in lieu of naming any particular opponent or faction, allowing the audience to fill in the blanks with whatever best suits their interpretation of current events. All these allusions create a timeless, high-minded tone that encourages the audience to see The Historical Significance of Current Events and gives the speech more lasting gravitas as an iconic, generalizable document of historical value.
By Winston Churchill
British Literature
View Collection
Essays & Speeches
View Collection
European History
View Collection
Good & Evil
View Collection
Inspiring Biographies
View Collection
Nobel Laureates in Literature
View Collection
Political Science Texts
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Safety & Danger
View Collection
World War II
View Collection