59 pages • 1 hour read
Diane ChamberlainA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
An understanding of Depression-era history in the United States provides useful context for Anna’s story. During the Great Depression, unemployment peaked at nearly 25%, according to the City University of New York. President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal implemented huge government spending projects to create jobs and alleviate the suffering of millions of Americans. Part of that New Deal was a Treasury Department-sponsored mural contest. Its intent was to boost optimism by creating public works of art as well as to provide employment for artists. It is in this context that Anna’s story begins, and she makes it clear that, in the aftermath of her mother’s suicide, the commission from her mural will keep her solvent for a while. Although Chamberlain never clarifies why Anna, a resident of New Jersey, is selected to paint a mural in Edenton, her arrival in town and her outsider status sets up the conflict with Martin, which is the catalyst for the novel’s sudden spiral into tragedy. Ultimately, whether or not the selection of an outsider artist like Anna is historically accurate is of little narrative importance, and Chamberlain’s historical research is otherwise thorough.
Another historical aspect to consider is the importance of post offices as community gathering spaces: “Post offices were located in virtually every community and available for viewing by all postal patrons—which made post office murals a truly democratic art form” (Raynor, Patricia. “Off the Wall: New Deal Post Office Murals.” Smithsonian National Postal Museum, 1997). While post offices may seem like quaint relics of the past, they were as vital to a community’s identity as malls later became, or as digital spaces are today. With this in mind, the Roosevelt administration sought to use public art to uplift a nation in distress, and the initiative stands as a testament to the administration’s appreciation of art as both inspiration and social glue. In fact, mural artists were strongly encouraged to keep the imagery “heroic” and avoid the tragic realism of the day, which explains the vigorous debate over whether or not to include the Edenton Tea Party in Anna’s mural. Content was meant to reflect the positive side of the community, and Edenton’s civic leaders therefore prefer to focus on their town’s future rather than on its past. As Toby Fiering, the manager of Edenton’s cotton mill, notes, “But it’s the townspeople who use the post office, and I think they’d rather see the industry of the day” (45). It is noteworthy that, in light of government attacks on the arts in the last few decades—Senator Jesse Helms’s attempts to abolish the National Endowment for the Arts, for example—there was once a time when the arts (and artists) were valued. As Harry Hopkins, Roosevelt’s “relief administrator” said in response to similar criticism, “[Artists] have got to eat just like other people” (Raynor).
The late 1930s through the early 1940s represented a time of reckoning and change for the United States. The Great Depression cast a pall over Americans’ perception of their country and the invulnerability of its economy. Seventy-five years after the end of the Civil War, racism festered in many areas of the country, as evidenced by the presence of Jim Crow laws and mob lynchings. While women had earned the right to vote, sexism also persisted, and all of these elements of social upheaval are evident in the narrative. Although Jesse’s family appears to be relatively prosperous, that prosperity hangs by a thread, and they all know it. If the unfounded rumors of Jesse and Anna’s love tryst were to spread, Jesse could easily become the victim of an angry mob, and whether the perpetrators would ever see justice is far from certain. That fear lurks in the shadows, always ready to arise at the slightest hint of indiscretion, and Jesse and his family are acutely aware of the danger he is in.
As for Anna, she walks in a world of patriarchal dominance and condescension. The town bristles at the fact that Anna was chosen for the competition over local artist Martin Drapple, but behind the overt conflict of local-versus-outsider is overlaid a thinly-veiled undercurrent of sexism. For example, Anna is repeatedly referred to as a “girl” even though she is an adult, and even Martin’s wife laments that her husband lost the commission to a “girl artist,” claiming, “[The mural committee] should have taken into account that a man would have a family to support” (117). Even seemingly benign manifestations of this pervasive attitude of sexism, such as the condemnation of Anna’s choice to wear pants while working, highlight a systemic attitude that attempts to govern all women’s actions; ultimately, it is this toxic attitude that culminates in Martin’s assault. When Anna kills Martin in self-defense, she fears that her status as both a woman and an outsider will preclude any real prosecution of justice. While Anna might get a fair hearing, given that Martin is abusive and is known to have an addiction to alcohol, her fear that her gender will be a barrier to a fair trial reflects the harsh reality of the time in which she lives. Both Anna and Jesse are innocent of wrongdoing, but because justice is capricious, neither one is willing to test those waters with their life.
By Diane Chamberlain