logo

57 pages 1 hour read

Maureen Callahan

Ask Not: The Kennedys and the Women They Destroyed

Nonfiction | Biography | Adult | Published in 2024

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Misuse of Political and Social Power

Ask Not critically examines how the Kennedys misused political and social power misuse through their interactions with those both inside and outside their sphere. The Kennedy men’s repeated transgressions, which seldom had consequences due to the family’s political clout and societal influence, reveal a pattern of exploitation and disregard for the well-being of others, particularly women. This unchecked power enabled them to manipulate narratives, evade justice, and exercise control, reflecting a broader commentary on how privilege can shield those in power from accountability.

One of the starkest examples of power misuse was Ted Kennedy’s role in the death of Mary Jo Kopechne. During a party at Chappaquiddick in 1969, Ted drunkenly drove his car off a bridge, leaving Mary Jo trapped inside as it submerged in water. He escaped, neglected to seek help, and left her to die. Later investigations suggested that Mary Jo may have survived had Ted called for assistance immediately. Rather than face the consequences, Ted prioritized his political career by quickly enlisting his aides and family to control the story: The media helped cast Mary Jo as a reckless “blonde” who may have been romantically involved with him. This framing deflected blame from Ted, reducing Mary Jo to a stereotype and blaming her in the process. Ted’s behavior, compounded by his refusal to tell Mary Jo’s grieving parents the truth, encapsulates the reckless and remorseless use of power for self-preservation.

Similarly, John F. Kennedy, Jr., demonstrated this pattern in his relationship with Carolyn Bessette Kennedy. Despite his numerous flaws and erratic behaviors, John Jr. expected unwavering loyalty from Bessette, cutting her off from her support networks and pressuring her to conform to an idealized public image. When he insisted on flying his private plane with Carolyn on board despite being unfit to pilot due to injury and medication, his overconfidence resulted in a tragic crash that claimed both their lives. Following the accident, the Kennedy family again manipulated public perception by sealing records and autopsies to shield John Jr.’s reputation from scrutiny, again exploiting their social power to avoid uncomfortable truths. The Kennedys’ refusal to acknowledge Caroline’s suffering (and the blame cast on her for allegedly delaying their flight) highlights the impunity with which the Kennedy family often operates.

The story of Rosemary Kennedy, subjected to a lobotomy at her father’s behest, reflects perhaps the most harrowing misuse of familial and social power. As a young woman who had intellectual and emotional challenges, Rosemary’s behavior failed to meet the strict Kennedy standards of decorum. Her father, Joseph Kennedy, Sr., exercised patriarchal authority to arrange a lobotomy to control her behavior, without her informed consent. The procedure left her with severe cognitive impairment, essentially erasing her from the public narrative of the Kennedy family. Rosemary’s tragic fate underscores the ruthless lengths to which the Kennedys were willing to go to protect their image, even at the expense of a family member’s dignity and autonomy.

Finally, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s support of Michael Skakel, who was convicted of murdering 16-year-old Martha Moxley, further exemplifies how the Kennedy family wields power to protect its members. Despite Michael’s conviction, Robert Jr. actively campaigned for his release, using his connections and influence to secure a retrial that ultimately overturned the conviction. This injustice highlights how those within the Kennedy circle exploit their influence to evade consequences, while Martha’s family continues to experience the effects of the Kennedy family’s lack of accountability.

Through these examples, Ask Not exposes a pattern of entitlement and impunity that defines the Kennedy family’s approach to power. Their ability to avoid repercussions, manipulate public narratives, and exercise control over others underscores the danger of unchecked power in the hands of a privileged few.

The Consistent Silencing of Women

Ask Not reveals the deep and often tragic consequences of a culture that prioritizes male privilege, family image, and social status over the voices and autonomy of women. The Kennedy family’s legacy is marked by the systematic erasure and suppression of women’s experiences and voices, resulting in lives shaped by isolation, exploitation, and, in many cases, tragedy.

One of the clearest examples is the treatment of Joan Kennedy, whose marriage to Ted Kennedy was a testament to the emotional toll of silencing women. Despite Ted’s highly publicized affairs and his heavy drinking, Joan faced intense scrutiny and judgment from both the public and her husband. While Ted’s behavior was largely excused or ignored, Joan was criticized for her appearance and blamed for her own struggles with addiction, which Ted’s behavior exacerbated. When Joan attempted to seek psychiatric help and attend rehab, Ted reportedly criticized her, viewing her as an embarrassment rather than offering support. Her struggles became a convenient deflection for Ted, who positioned himself as a sympathetic figure dealing with a troubled wife, a narrative that obscured his own damaging actions. Joan’s moment of empowerment during Ted’s 1980 presidential campaign (when voters, particularly women, related to her more than to Ted) highlights the consequences of her long silence. When she did find her voice, it had the power to shift public opinion, but by then, her own life had been marked by years of silencing.

The tragic story of Rosemary Kennedy further illustrates the devastating effects of the family’s silencing of women. Born with cognitive disabilities, Rosemary was considered an embarrassment within a family fixated on perfection and achievement. Her father, Joseph Kennedy, Sr., ordered a lobotomy to “correct” her behavior without her consent, a decision that left her permanently disabled. The family effectively erased Rosemary from public memory, hiding her away in a care facility for the rest of her life. This act of silencing did not just rob Rosemary of her autonomy and future; it also exemplifies the patriarchal power that the Kennedys exerted over women in their family: A woman’s voice was valuable only if it conformed to the family’s expectations.

Mary Jo Kopechne’s death at Chappaquiddick underscores how the silencing of women protected powerful men at the expense of truth and justice. When Ted drove his car off a bridge, leaving Mary Jo trapped inside to die, he prioritized his own political survival over her life. Media coverage and Ted’s own narrative quickly shifted blame to Mary Jo, portraying her as reckless or complicit, despite evidence that she was likely innocent. Ted’s reluctance to immediately contact authorities and his shifting accounts of the accident reveal a calculated effort to protect his image, effectively silencing Mary Jo’s voice by framing her as a casualty of her own supposed irresponsibility. The Kennedy family’s influence over the media allowed Ted to avoid serious consequences, while Mary Jo’s parents, deprived of any real answers, grieved in silence.

Marilyn Monroe’s alleged relationships with John and Bobby Kennedy similarly highlight the toll of women’s silencing in the Kennedy orbit. Allegedly drawn into an affair with John and later with Bobby, Marilyn was discarded once she became inconvenient. The sense of abandonment that she felt after being used and then cut off from the Kennedys exacerbated her downward spiral and eventual death. Her reported attempts to expose the truth, coupled with rumors of missing diary entries and altered phone records, suggest that the Kennedys actively silenced her voice to protect their reputations and power. Marilyn’s tragic end, like that of many other women connected to the Kennedys, revealed the brutal consequences of a system that values loyalty to power over truth or justice.

Through these stories, Ask Not examines how the rewards of silencing women (protection of reputation, political advantage, and preservation of male privilege) have a steep price, often involving irrevocable damage to the lives and legacies of the women involved. The Kennedy family’s systematic silencing of women not only illustrates the personal costs of such erasure but also serves as a broader critique of how patriarchal systems exploit and marginalize women for the benefit of powerful men.

Media Complicity in Maintaining a Public Image

In Ask Not, the theme of media complicity in upholding the Kennedy family’s polished public image is pervasive and powerful. The Kennedys, often considered America’s “royal family,” carefully crafted an image of glamor, success, and moral authority, a facade that media outlets have consistently helped preserve by downplaying or concealing stories that could tarnish their legacy. This cooperation not only amplifies the Kennedys’ power but also often leaves the women in their lives misrepresented or altogether erased.

One of the most glaring examples of media complicity is evident in the handling of Ted Kennedy’s role in the Chappaquiddick incident, which led to Mary Jo Kopechne’s death. Following Ted’s car accident in 1969, when he drove off a bridge and left Mary Jo trapped inside, the media quickly and subtly shaped the narrative to protect him. The press portrayed her as an irresponsible woman, implying that she may have been romantically involved with Ted or that she had acted recklessly, despite her likely having no active role in the accident. Rather than pressuring Ted for accountability or offering a platform for Mary Jo’s family to share their grief, the media helped frame her as a mere tragic accessory to Ted’s political “misstep.” This coverage enabled Ted to evade serious consequences, emphasizing sympathy for his political future over justice for Mary Jo, whose parents were denied both truth and closure.

Similarly, the media’s treatment of Joan Kennedy reveals how they manipulated public sympathy to shield a Kennedy man from scrutiny. While Joan publicly experienced the effects of alcoholism, the media focused heavily on her personal struggles, often ignoring Ted’s well-documented infidelities and dismissing his role in her emotional deterioration. Ted used Joan’s vulnerabilities to shape his image, portraying himself as a man burdened by a troubled wife, while the press largely ignored the toxic behaviors that contributed to Joan’s pain. When Joan finally gained public support during Ted’s 1980 presidential campaign, largely from women who saw her as a symbol of resilience, the shift threatened the Kennedy brand. Ted’s advisors urged Joan to attend events since her popularity bolstered his campaign, illustrating how quickly the media shifted from vilifying her to valorizing her when it suited Ted’s ambitions.

The silencing of Marilyn Monroe’s story after her death further highlights the media’s role in selectively shaping Kennedy narratives. Despite her alleged relationships with both John and Bobby, the press quickly distanced the Kennedys from Marilyn after her suspicious death in 1962. The media overlooked details that pointed to potential foul play, such as missing phone records and altered surveillance tapes, which framed her as a tragic figure (a “fallen” woman) rather than examining the impact of her ties to the Kennedys. The abrupt cancellation of an ABC documentary in the 1980s investigating the Kennedy family’s involvement in her death likewise illustrates how the media was not just passively complicit but also actively engaged in suppressing stories that could implicate powerful figures.

Another example of this complicity is the treatment of Patricia Bowman, who accused William Kennedy Smith, John’s nephew, of rape in 1991. Patricia character and decisions, rather than her accusations, became the focus of media attention. In an interview, journalist Diane Sawyer expressed sympathy not for Patricia but for William, worrying about his reputation and casting Patricia’s actions as questionable simply because she was out late. This line of questioning reflects how deeply media bias favored protecting Kennedy men over supporting women, effectively shifting the blame and casting aspersions on Patricia.

These examples show how the media’s willingness to protect the Kennedy legacy has shaped public perception by concealing or reframing the actions of the Kennedy men while sacrificing the voices of women. By helping preserve a myth of Kennedy infallibility, the media has enabled patterns of behavior that leave women like Mary Jo, Marilyn, Patricia, and Joan in the shadows. Ask Not critiques this complicity, revealing how the selective coverage of powerful figures creates a distorted public image at the expense of truth, integrity, and justice.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text