43 pages • 1 hour read
PlatoA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Born in 470 BCE, Socrates was an Athenian philosopher who, despite having left behind no writings of his own, is considered one of the earliest and most important figures in Western philosophy. His life and ideas were immortalized in numerous secondary accounts, particularly those written by his star pupil Plato and the contemporary historian Xenophon. In what is known as “the Socratic problem,” scholars struggle to construct a coherent and historically accurate image of Socrates’s life, philosophy, and personality. For example, there is a scholarly consensus that in his later dialogues, Plato used Socrates as a fictional vehicle conveying Plato’s own views. Apology, however, which recreates Socrates’s 399 BCE trial for impiety and corrupting the youth, is considered one of Plato’s more valuable and reliable accounts. This is because the trial was a historical event substantiated by other accounts by Xenophon and the rhetorician Polycrates. Moreover, as scholar and translator G.M.A. Grube writes in a foreword to Apology, “[M]any Athenians would remember [Socrates’s] actual speech, and it would be a poor way to vindicate the Master, which is the obvious intent, to put a completely different speech into his mouth” (21).
In his defense speech Socrates comes off as alternatively humble and arrogant; one moment he characterizes his own wisdom as “worthless,” and the next he claims he is anointed by the gods to expose the ignorance of the Athenian elite. He clearly savors engaging in a rhetorical jousting match against Meletus, whom Socrates easily manipulates into contradicting himself. In doing so, he uses what is now known as the Socratic method, by which underlying assumptions and fallacies are exposed through the process of interrogation. Socrates also uses what scholars now refer to as Socratic irony, pretending to be ignorant to draw out the ignorance of others. He expresses apathy—feigned or otherwise—in the face of death to emphasize how the jury only does itself wrong by condemning Socrates and depriving Athens of such a helpful “gadfly.”
If there is a defining trait that shines through Socrates’s layers of irony and rhetoric, it is his appreciation of integrity above all else, in both himself and others. Having received his death sentence, he makes it clear he prefers death to exile or abandonment of the practice of philosophy. Shortly after his sentence, Socrates administered his own execution by drinking poisonous hemlock.
The author of Apology, Plato was an Athenian philosopher and Socrates’s most famous student. Unlike Socrates, Plato left extensive written records of his work, including numerous other dialogues featuring his mentor. It is largely through Plato’s work that philosophers and historians engage with Socrates, given that Socrates left behind no written works of his own. Nevertheless, this can be problematic because most scholars agree that Plato’s depiction of Socrates in his later work is largely fictional, as Plato uses Socrates as a character to convey his own views.
By contrast, Plato was a firsthand observer to Socrates’s trial, and while strict historical authenticity was never an expectation of Plato and his peers, scholars agree that Apology, while by no means a journalistic account of the trial, is broadly accurate in spirit. Plato is mentioned directly on two occasions in Apology: first, when Socrates says that if he is guilty of corrupting the youth, then Plato’s father should surely be here among his accusers; and second, when Socrates names Plato among those friends offering to put up money to pay a possible fine.
Plato wrote two other dialogues chronicling the circumstances surrounding Socrates’s trial and execution: Crito, in which Socrates discusses the nature of injustice in the days following his trial; and Phaedo—alternately called On the Soul—in which Socrates considers the nature of the immortal soul before drinking the poisonous hemlock mixture.
Like Socrates, Plato inspired his own younger student Aristotle, whose legacy may loom even larger over Western culture and history than Socrates’s and Plato’s.
Meletus, Anytus, and Lycon are the three Athenian men listed as formal accusers against Socrates in his trial. Of the three, only Meletus speaks in the text, as Socrates uses him to demonstrate how his method of interrogation and interlocution can expose the ignorance of Athenian elites. Little else is known of Meletus outside of his role in Socrates’s trial, which Plato details here and in other dialogues. Socrates says Meletus attacks him “on behalf of the poets” (28), while Anytus does so on behalf of politicians, and Lycon on behalf of rhetoricians.
Despite the important role Meletus plays in Apology, historical accounts indicate that the accusations were spearheaded by Anytus, a prominent politician and general in the Peloponnesian War. Given his democratic sympathies and hatred of the Thirty Tyrants, Anytus may have been driven by a desire to punish Socrates for remaining in Athens during the Tyrants’ reign of terror. According to scholars, this motivation was likely shared by the third accuser Lycon, whose son Autolycus was killed by the Thirty Tyrants.
By Plato