83 pages • 2 hours read
Roxanne Dunbar-OrtizA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
Dunbar-Ortiz outlines what she hopes to accomplish and introduces key concepts and terms. She clarifies that she is not writing about a history of Indigenous peoples, but rather a history of the United States as a settler-colonialist state by illuminating the experiences of Indigenous peoples. She poses the following “central question”: “How might acknowledging the reality of US history work to transform society?” (2)
Dunbar-Ortiz characterizes the destruction of Indigenous civilizations as a policy choice, with settler colonialism as a key explanation of what destroyed Indigenous communities. She defines settler colonialism as relying on violence and a “genocidal policy” because the goal of colonialists involved extinction of Indigenous peoples from the outset. She further describes the founding of the U.S. as based in white supremacy, slavery, genocide, and land theft. Land, and who controls it, maintains it, invades it, or what happens to it, takes a central role in the history of the U.S.
Dunbar-Ortiz notes that the origin narrative or myth of the founding of the United States is based on the idea that Puritan settlers “had a covenant with God to take the land” (3). The origin narrative also includes the idea of the United States being “born of rebellion against oppression” as part of an anticolonial fight for liberation and the idea of manifest destiny. This origin myth is in turn reinforced by the Doctrine of Discovery, which gave Europeans the self-claimed power to obtain title to any land they found and claimed over any right of people already on that land. Dunbar-Ortiz argues for a reframing of the common narrative using a colonial framework to fully understand U.S. history through the eyes of Indigenous peoples because the origin myth has created an inherent acceptance of genocide and settler colonialism within U.S. society.
Dunbar-Ortiz is critical of methods used by historians who traditionally have protected the U.S. origin myth. When the movements of the 1960s called for a new approach, historians often remained biased and characterized Indigenous experience with European settlers as an “encounter” or “conflict between cultures.” More recently, they also used the concept of multiculturalism, which focused on the idea of various groups that together contributed to the country’s greatness, such as describing Indigenous peoples’ contribution as corn, beans, and Thanksgiving. Dunbar-Ortiz believes this “nation of immigrants” narrative, along with other approaches to history, fails to identify the reality of settler colonialism and genocide. As a result, the origin myth has persisted into modern U.S. society and culture and continues to contribute to a general ignorance of the country’s history and failure to resolve “harm done by that past” (5). For instance, we can see Columbus appear in various ways, such as Columbus Day or in names like Columbia University or the District of Columbia.
Dunbar-Ortiz references the concept of “firsting and lasting” to describe history often being told in ways that erase Indigenous peoples, such as Europeans as “first” to discover or settle while also describing Indigenous people as “last” of their people or cultural references like “The Last of the Mohicans.” Nevertheless, Indigenous peoples have resisted settler colonialism for centuries. Despite approximately 15 million Indigenous people prior to colonization in present-day United States, there are now only approximately 3 million Indigenous people representing more than 500 federally-recognized communities. Dunbar-Ortiz also traces the establishment of reservations as part of treaty-making with Indigenous nations that the public ultimately viewed as Indigenous people “taking a free ride on public domain” based on the idea that land was being taken from public domain for Indigenous peoples (11), ignoring that Indigenous people have lost most of their land over time.
She finishes the introduction by summarizing four major periods of U.S. government’s policy of genocide: (1) forced removal under President Andrew Jackson; (2) the California gold rush; (3) the “Indian Wars” after the Civil War in the Great Plains region; and (4) the termination era of the 1950s.
Dunbar-Ortiz details the lives of Indigenous communities in the Americas prior to colonization by Europeans. She particularly paints a picture of thriving civilizations with corn as a central part of Indigenous survival, society, and culture. Challenging popular belief, Dunbar-Ortiz asserts that the Americas were not a “new world” (15) or a “virgin wilderness” (30) but a vast network of communities and complex civilizations with agricultural practices, systems of governance, roads, and trade. Indigenous populations were large, with approximately 100 million people in the Western Hemisphere prior to the arrival of Europeans at the end of the 15th century. In addition to healthy diets, the large Indigenous population sizes were also supported by good hygiene practices and herbal medicine that helped limit diseases.
Corn was sacred and required human attention with complex irrigation systems to grow properly. Dunbar-Ortiz identifies the origins of corn in the Valley of Mexico and Central America, or Mesoamerica, beginning with the Mayans. Corn cultivation was central to culture and religion. The Mayans also made advancements in art, astronomy, science, and mathematics, such as developing the concept of zero in 36BC. They had large city-states governed by priests and nobility, albeit the use of forced labor eventually led to uprisings that led to Mayan collapse. Another example of a large Indigenous civilization was the Olmec civilization in the same region as the Mayans. The Aztecs arrived in the Valley of Mexico in the 12th century and used alliances to obtain control of the region with corn as their main crop and the hydraulic agricultural system as the key to their economy. Market and trade networks were complex and widespread, reaching as far as eastern North America. The Aztecs were weakened after experiencing uprisings due to its oppression of peasants and the Spanish ultimately, with a genocidal war led by Cortés and lasting three years, overthrew the Aztecs with the help of resistant peasants.
Meanwhile, further north in what is now the Southwestern United States, agriculture was being practiced by 2100 BC, with irrigation systems as early as 1250 BC. The Hohokam peoples built a canal system in this region, and farmers traded crops across a vast network reaching into the Great Plains region. The Anasazi people in the present-day “Four Corners” region constructed miles of roads that connected around 75 communities. Other communities in the region included the Navajos (or Diné) and the Apaches.
The extremely fertile Mississippi Valley region had the city-state of Cahokia and others containing tens of thousands of people with monumental constructions around the 12th century. This territory included the Indigenous nations of the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Muskogee Cree, Seminole, and Natchez Nation. In the north around the Great Lakes region and as far south as the Carolinas, the Six Nations of the Iroquois Confederacy, also known as the Haudenosaunee confederacy, was made up of the Seneca, Cayuga, Onondaga, Oneida, Mohawk Nations, and, later, the Tuscaroras. They operated on a “clan-village system of democracy based on collective stewardship of the land” and a matrilineal system (24).
Bison-dependent peoples of the prairies of Central North America down to West Texas and the Rocky Mountains included the Cree in the present-day Canada region, the Lakota and Dakota Sioux, the Cheyenne, and the Arapaho. Similarly, farther south had nations of the Ponca, Pawnee, Osage, and Kiowa with millions of buffalo in the area. The Pacific Northwest region had seafaring and fishing peoples, such as the Tlingit, Salish, Makah, Hoopa, Pomo, Karok, and the Yurok peoples, connected by trade with lots of natural resources, including salmon.
Dunbar-Ortiz details the governance systems of Indigenous nations and city-states as consisting of a wide variety of systems. Decision making was consensus-based rather than by majority rule. In the region east of the Mississippi River, there were towns or federations of towns with family lineages as governing bodies led by male elders who required approval from a council of elders composed of different clans of the town. Each town had a sacred fire that represented the town’s relationship with spirits. Meanwhile, in the Southeast, the Muskogee Creek and Seminole tribes governed under three branches made up of civil administration, the military, and a relationship with the sacred with leaders from the elite.
Indigenous nations also developed practices of diplomacy with agreements as sacred pledges to each other and to spirits. Women also played a key role in governance in various societies, including holding political authority, as in the case of the Haudenosaunee and Cherokee, or having the responsibility of choosing representatives, as in the case of the Mohawks or Oneidas, for example. The crux of many Indigenous societies was valuing the interest of the community over that of any individual.
Dunbar-Ortiz also describes how Indigenous people took special care of the land as its stewards and shaped it significantly before Europeans arrived. This involved trade networks, roads, using fire to control wild landscape or attract game, and transforming forests into lands on which bison could thrive. Dunbar-Ortiz concludes by emphasizing the relationships, civilizations, and advancements that existed in the Americas and were lost to colonialism.
Dunbar-Ortiz analyzes the “culture of conquest” (32) involving “violence, expropriation, destruction, and dehumanization” in the Americas as originally developing in Europe prior to European colonization of the Americas. She identifies one of the origins as the Crusades from the 11th through 13th centuries that involved conquering North Africa and the Middle East regions, particularly to control Muslim trade routes. Dunbar-Ortiz calls this approach a “profit-based religion” that was later brought to the Americas by colonizers who sought wealth for themselves while displaying “a Christian zeal that justified colonialism” (32-33). The Crusades were also a source of “militaristic tradition,” as soldiers sacked and looted Muslim communities. Wealth became concentrated in the hands of a small group of people. Toward the end of the 13th century, the papacy targeted pagans, women as witches, and commoners whose land was seized by knights and nobles. Simultaneously, commoners would be recruited into crusading against Muslims. Dunbar-Ortiz labels European peasantry as the first group of people “forcibly organized under the profit motive” (33) as their lands were seized and then they were exploited for their labor. Elsewhere, colonization was taking place in nations like Scotland, Wales, and Ireland, and Muslims and Jews were expelled from Iberia beginning in 1492.
Dunbar-Ortiz argues that these historical practices and events served as a template for how European colonizers later approached lands across the Atlantic. Colonialism, relocation, and expropriation methods were practiced extensively by the end of the 15th century. These methods and strategies of exploitation and displacement were then transported across the Atlantic to the Americas and later to Africa, the Pacific, and Asia. Having these strategies is what Dunbar-Ortiz notes as the key difference between western European explorers of the 15th and 16th centuries versus others who came before them, such as the Arabs, Norse, Chinese, or Polynesians.
Dunbar-Ortiz highlights the development of the idea of land as private property as originating with Europeans, especially the British. In 16th-century England, the “commons” were privatized for commercial sheep production and peasants whose lands were seized were then forced to work in textile factories under poor working conditions. Out of desperation, this exploited and impoverished population later became “land-hungry” (36) settlers in British colonies in North America, lured with the promise of land after serving a period of indentured servitude.
White supremacy, “the core ideology for modern colonialism,” (37) also found its roots in the Crusades in Muslim territories and the colonization of Ireland by Protestants. The papal law of cleanliness of blood was the foundation of the Spanish Inquisition and was a concept previously unknown before as Muslims and Jews who had converted came under scrutiny and investigation. Special treatment was given to “Old Christians” over converts and served as a unifying factor and helped to ignore class differences among “Old Christians” by giving poor people a way to identify with the rich and hope for upward mobility. Dunbar-Ortiz labels this “imagined racial sameness” even among different classes of people as the origin of white supremacy, which only helped to limit any ill-will the poor might feel toward the landed or the elite.
Similarly, the British took these ideas of racial supremacy from the Spanish racial caste system and applied it through a Protestant lens with the idea of themselves as “a chosen people founding and raising a New Jerusalem” (38). The British also had experience with colonization and imperialism through its conquest of Ireland in the early 17th century where settlers arrived mainly from western Scotland, which had, along with Wales, already been conquered by England earlier. In its colonization of Ireland, England attacked Irish culture, social systems, and killed many clans. Just as they would later in North America against Indigenous peoples, English officials placed bounties on the heads or scalps of Irish people. The settlers in Northern Ireland considered the Irish to be an inferior race.
Dunbar-Ortiz criticizes the common narrative among historians that European-American conquest of Indigenous populations was largely due to disease or that their deaths were inevitable. She argues that such an assumption ignores the role of settler colonialism as “genocidal by plan” (42) and fails to explain continued warfare for centuries that followed on the continent. Gold became the driving force for colonization and conquest of the Americas. When Columbus, representing Spain, arrived in the Caribbean in present-day Dominican Republic and Haiti, he returned with gold and enslaved Indigenous peoples. The Treaty of Tordesillas of 1494 created the Doctrine of Discovery and made a dividing line specifying the areas on either side as available for conquest by either Spain or Portugal. Under various conquistadors, the Spanish conquered and waged war against Indigenous civilizations, such as the Aztecs in Mexico and the Incas in the Andes region, all while gathering gold and silver. Meanwhile, Portugal destroyed present-day Brazil and began the Atlantic slave trade by sending enslaved Africans to South America. The sudden, large increases in wealth by a few led to most Europeans becoming increasingly poor and dependent on the wealthy minority for the first time. This dependency would later become a global reality due to “capitalist-based colonialism” (43).
Dunbar-Ortiz reaffirms her rejection of the myth that North America was all wilderness upon the arrival of Europeans. Instead, she asserts that conquest by European settlers, and therefore loss of land by Indigenous people, led to land being unattended, with forests growing wild and settlers cutting down trees in other areas. The myth of a “pristine wilderness” became a part of the U.S. origin myth, when in reality, there were large networks, roads, farmlands, and more under Indigenous management that was stolen from them. Dunbar-Ortiz cites historian Francis Jennings in his argument that Europeans did not have the technology, resources, or ability to maintain colonies across the Atlantic if the land indeed had been “virgin land” or true wilderness (47).
Another aspect of the U.S. origin myth is the idea of U.S. exceptionalism, which “has been used to justify appropriation of the continent and then domination of the rest of the world” (47). Dunbar-Ortiz characterizes the United States as a covenant state. The idea of the covenant and influence of scriptures informed the idea among believers as fulfilling a duty to occupy a promised land for God, especially involving the defeat of enemies or heathens in the process. The religious reformer John Calvin was especially instrumental in spreading the covenant ideology and Hebrew scriptures to European Christians. Calvinism became a Protestant Christian separatist movement, as reflected in Calvinist ideology among the Puritans of the Massachusetts Bay Colony for example. A key belief by Calvinists was predestination and being called upon by God as a chosen person. Colonists applied Calvinist ideology to label themselves as predestined chosen peoples and Indigenous people as the opposite.
A key group of settlers were the Ulster-Scots or Scots-Irish, who were Protestants from Scotland that settled in Northern Ireland when the British colonized it. As most of them were poor and landless, they decided to settle the British colonies in North America as indentured servants. These settlers brought their Calvinist ideology of the covenant to North America after already having gained experience as settler colonialists in Northern Ireland, which included working as soldiers for the British in Ireland and engaging in the practice of scalping Irish people for bounty. They similarly were at the forefront of British colonial militias in the French and Indian War and later were troops and the largest group of settlers in the westward expansion of the U.S, becoming involved in destroying Indigenous towns as they sought to gain access to Indigenous lands that would become private property. During the settlers’ war for independence, most Scots-Irish were the “backbone” of Washington’s army (54). They viewed themselves as divinely chosen and “authentic patriots, entitled to the land through their blood sacrifice” (54) just as their descendants continue to view them. It is these groups of settlers upon whom many U.S. myths are based, and many presidents of the United States had Scots-Irish ancestry.
The covenant ideology can also be seen in the U.S. origin story as represented by the Mayflower Compact signed by English pilgrims of Plymouth Colony as a covenant with God. Similarly, in modern day, many U.S. citizens consider the U.S. Constitution to be a covenant with God. Their “cult-like adherence” to the U.S. Constitution is not seen in other modern constitutional states, and this covenant ideology has become the “bedrock of U.S. patriotism” which continues to reinforce the idea of U.S. exceptionalism (50). Similarly, other historical documents, such as the Declaration of Independence, Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, the Pledge of Allegiance, and even Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech “are all bundled into the covenant as sacred documents” (50). Even within the idea of the U.S. as a “nation of immigrants” (50), immigrants are invited to be a part of the sacred covenant, but they must continue to prove their loyalty, a sharp contrast to the descendants of settlers who are already deemed patriotic.
In the first chapters of this book, Dunbar-Ortiz provides a foundation and historical background necessary to understand later chapters and introduces key terms and themes. She begins by first outlining her goals and intentions of this book. Her introductory question to readers forms the crux of her goal by emphasizing the need to learn and understand the realities of U.S. history as the key to creating a better future. She hopes to encourage readers to challenge the common historical narrative of United States history and introduces her primary argument that the United States is a country founded on settler-colonialism and genocide. These early chapters set up a juxtaposition of two images of the United States that Dunbar-Ortiz explores through the remainder of the book: one image born from the ideas of U.S. exceptionalism and an origin myth romanticizing the United States as a nation of freedom, democracy, and liberty, and an opposing image of a grim history of violence, genocide, slavery, and land theft.
Similarly, she juxtaposes her analytical framework and narrative approach with that of the traditional frameworks used for United States history. Her rejection of common approaches by historians includes anything that falls into the default “trap of a mythological unconscious belief in manifest destiny” (6). Euphemisms like “encounters” or “conflict between cultures” to describe the relations between Indigenous peoples and colonizers mask the more accurate reality that using words like genocide would provide. Her critique of the popular multicultural approach is also enlightening, as multiculturalism too falls into the default trap by focusing only on “contributions” of various peoples and immigrants to this country’s exceptionalism to obscure problematic history.
In contrast to common historical approaches, Dunbar-Ortiz has no interest in compromising historical reality to fit history into an origin narrative that tries to place a positive spin on the past. To Dunbar-Ortiz, the roots of the United States are anything but exceptional, and she believes it is an ongoing disservice to society to fail to acknowledge that past. The result is a blunt analysis throughout. She sees no room for any other conclusion or attempt to reconcile the violent history of the United States with its ideals of freedom and democracy, warning her audience that “[t]hose who seek history with an upbeat ending, a history of redemption and reconciliation, may look around and observe that such a conclusion is not visible, not even in utopian dreams of a better society” (2).
From the outset of her book as evidenced in these early chapters, Dunbar-Ortiz does not hesitate in adopting a highly critical and scathing tone of the common narratives surrounding U.S. history and key beliefs that make up the U.S. American identity. She further bolsters her points by incorporating and providing a different perspective on highly recognizable names, events, or other examples. Similarly, she supports her critique of common words or descriptions used that she believes distort history by being careful and intentional with her own word choice and descriptions. For example, she puts quotation marks around terms like “discover” that she hopes to highlight as reflecting bias in the narrative of U.S. history.
One of the primary methods she uses to support her arguments regarding U.S. history is breaking down long-standing, entrenched myths. She identifies the various ways in which they live on through popular culture and historical scholarship. Her analysis shows how strong these myths are and the persistence of colonialism and its pernicious effects. The following are key historical distortions she introduces in these early chapters and continues to detail and combat throughout the book:
By discussing the historical context and events happening in Europe pre-colonization of the Americas in Chapters 2 and 3, Dunbar-Ortiz draws a direct line between experiences, beliefs, and the “culture of conquest” developed among Europeans that were brought to the Americas with tragic consequences. She highlights particularly the Crusades, the Spanish expulsion of Jews and Muslims, and the British conquest and colonization of Ireland. Dunbar-Ortiz asserts that these events were a preview of how European colonizers and settlers would come across the Atlantic, as they had learned, practiced, and perfected their methods of colonization and conquest in Europe, and “their methods for eradicating peoples or forcing them into dependency and servitude were ingrained, streamlined, and effective” (40). Among the ideologies brought over were white supremacy and covenant ideology. Both these became parts of a narrative of superiority of early settlers in the Americas. They became reinforced over time and fed into the idea of U.S. exceptionalism later. To demonstrate how this ideology manifests itself in the present, Dunbar-Ortiz provides modern examples of covenant ideology, such as the 21st century “‘gun lobby,’ based on the sanctity of the Second Amendment” (50).
Lastly, in identifying land as the center of everything, she sets up later arguments that display how money was a driving force for land-hungry settlers as they squatted on Indigenous land farther and farther west. This goes hand in hand with her discussion in Chapter 2 of the gradual privatization of land in Europe. Both Indigenous and early European society operated on the idea of land as communal, not as private property. As Dunbar-Ortiz discusses, the concept of land as private property developed in Europe before colonization of the Americas and was then brought over across the Atlantic and applied to stolen Indigenous lands. Thus, although not the primary objective or target of overall focus, she also incorporates here and throughout the book an underlying criticism of capitalism or “capitalist-based colonialism” (43).
By Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz
Anthropology
View Collection
Books on U.S. History
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Colonial America
View Collection
Colonialism & Postcolonialism
View Collection
Colonialism Unit
View Collection
Community
View Collection
Contemporary Books on Social Justice
View Collection
Education
View Collection
Equality
View Collection
Indigenous People's Literature
View Collection
Memorial Day Reads
View Collection
Military Reads
View Collection
Nation & Nationalism
View Collection
New York Times Best Sellers
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Power
View Collection
The Future
View Collection
The Past
View Collection
War
View Collection