71 pages • 2 hours read
Kai Bird, Martin J. SherwinA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Content Warning: This section discusses death by suicide.
On December 21, 1953, J. Robert Oppenheimer learned that the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) had deemed him a potential security risk and planned to conduct a review of his background. In Washington DC, Oppenheimer and his wife, Kitty, visited the Georgetown home of his lawyer, Herbert Marks, and Marks’s wife, Ann. After deciding to fight the AEC’s charges, Robert went upstairs. Moments later, Herbert, Ann, and Kitty heard a crash. Oppenheimer had collapsed. Bird and Sherwin briefly describe Oppenheimer’s coming ordeal, documented in the transcript of the AEC Personnel Security Hearing Board’s 1954 report, In the Matter of J. Robert Oppenheimer. The authors set this ordeal in the context of the era’s strong wave of anti-Communist sentiment.
On February 25, 1967, mourners gathered in Princeton, New Jersey, for Robert Oppenheimer’s funeral. Nobel Prize-winning physicists, scholars, and other luminaries paid their respects. The ceremony featured three eulogies, including one delivered by George Kennan, Oppenheimer’s friend and the author of the US “containment” policy against the Soviet Union (which US officials adopted in the late 1940s and pursued as a primary Cold War strategy for decades thereafter). Kennan remembered his late friend as a principled patriot. Bird and Sherwin describe Oppenheimer as “an enigma” (5).
Born on April 22, 1904, J. Robert Oppenheimer entered the world at a consequential time for theoretical physics, highlighted by the 1905 publication of Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity. Robert’s parents, Julius Oppenheimer and Ella Friedman, were German Jewish immigrants who had settled separately in New York before meeting and eventually marrying. Julius had amassed substantial wealth in the textile business. Ella, a young artist with a strong personality, formed a powerful bond with her son Robert but protected him to excess. As an elementary school student, Robert developed solitary and diverse pursuits such as poetry and studying minerals—and showed signs of precocious genius. As a teen, Robert attended the Ethical Culture School in New York, the instructional arm of the Ethical Culture Society. Founded by Dr. Felix Adler, the son of another German Jewish immigrant, the Ethical Culture Society promoted secular humanism. The school attracted students from affluent families, including Jewish families eager to assimilate into an increasingly antisemitic US society. Robert’s teachers were socially conscious; one had descended directly from a famous 19th-century abolitionist.
Robert excelled as a student, but his sheltered upbringing made it difficult to form friendships, so he often appeared to other students either conceited or withdrawn. He did develop a friendship with Francis Fergusson, a scholarship student from New Mexico. In addition, Robert discovered both an enthusiasm and an aptitude for sailing, along with a curious disregard for physical danger. In the spring of 1922, a year after graduating from the Ethical Culture School, his friend and teacher Herbert Smith took Robert on a summer trip to New Mexico, where they stayed with Fergusson and his family. At the Los Pinos Ranch northeast of Santa Fe, Robert met Katherine Chaves Page, a 28-year-old married woman with whom he became infatuated and formed a lifelong friendship. Robert fell in love with New Mexico’s physical beauty, including a pleasant plateau overlooking the valley of Los Alamos.
After returning from New Mexico, 18-year-old Oppenheimer entered Harvard University. Once again, he struggled to make friends. In addition, he periodically experienced depression. Academically, he chose chemistry as a major but quickly learned that his truest scientific love lied in theoretical physics. During his sophomore year, he attended multiple lectures by Nobel Prize-winning physicist Neils Bohr, celebrated for his work on the atom. Oppenheimer proved a brilliant yet unusual scientist: He adored the theory of physics but abhorred experimental work in laboratories. His gloom deepened, and he often unburdened himself in letters to his friend and former teacher, Herbert Smith.
Oppenheimer graduated summa cum laude in 1925 after only three years at Harvard. That summer, he took his parents to New Mexico, where they lodged at Katherine Page’s ranch. Along with Paul Horgan, a friend from his previous New Mexico trip, Robert enjoyed extensive horseback riding in the mountains he now loved. Frank Oppenheimer, Robert’s 13-year-old brother, accompanied them. Robert acquired a smoking habit.
In September 1925, Oppenheimer sailed for England to begin graduate studies at Cambridge University. His friend Francis Fergusson, a Rhodes Scholar studying at Oxford, met him at the train station. At Cambridge, Oppenheimer displayed rare brilliance. He bristled at dull lab work, however, and experienced terrible depression (which threatened to derail his life) and erratic behavior.
Ella Oppenheimer tried to improve her son’s mental health by inviting Inez Pollak, a young woman who was one of Robert’s high-school classmates, to accompany the family to England. Their courtship proved disastrous, however, and he experienced even deeper depression. Then, in an act both self-destructive and vindictive, Robert foolishly and dangerously laced an apple with a substance designed to sicken whoever ate it and then left the apple for a teacher he detested. Spared expulsion and criminal charges, Robert received psychiatric care. He felt on the verge of self-harm. When his friend Francis Fergusson revealed that his girlfriend had accepted his proposal of marriage, Robert snapped, wound a belt around his friend’s neck, and then collapsed on the floor, weeping. Fergusson forgave his deeply troubled friend.
In the spring of 1926, Robert accompanied three other friends on a short vacation to Corsica. There, he appeared to have an epiphany, for his outlook had improved when he returned. Back at Cambridge, he met Neils Bohr in person and decided to throw all of his energies into theoretical physics.
Having nearly self-destructed at Cambridge, Oppenheimer decided to continue his studies at Georgia Augusta University in the small German town of Gottingen, which Bird and Sherwin describe as “undoubtedly the center of theoretical physics” (56). Max Born, the Physics Department Chair, had instructed such brilliant physicists as Werner Heisenberg, Wolfgang Pauli, and Enrico Fermi. Oppenheimer noted the deteriorating political and economic conditions in the waning years of Germany’s Weimar Republic. As a precocious intellectual, he still sometimes intimidated and even alienated his fellow students, and his despairing moods occasionally returned. Nonetheless, he excelled in Gottingen, publishing an astonishing seven papers in the emerging field of quantum physics. One paper, on the behavior of molecules, laid the foundation for decades of work in high-energy physics.
Having earned his doctoral degree in Gottingen, Oppenheimer returned to New York in 1927. After one postdoctoral term back at Harvard, he moved to Pasadena, California, and began teaching at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in early 1928. That summer, Robert and his brother, Frank, now 16 and an aspiring physicist too, returned to New Mexico and stayed with Katherine Page. They convinced their father to lease a nearby ranch, which they named Perro Caliente. Robert later purchased the ranch and returned to it often.
Back in Pasadena, Robert found that his growing reputation as a theoretical physicist had expanded his opportunities. He accepted a joint position at Caltech and the University of California, Berkeley. First, however, he secured a fellowship to return to Europe and study for another year. In Copenhagen, he studied under Wolfgang Pauli, whom he grew to admire, and met Isidor I. Rabi, a young fellow physicist of Jewish ancestry who, like Robert, had grown up in New York. Unlike Robert, however, Rabi embraced his Jewish heritage. Robert and Rabi nonetheless developed a strong friendship.
Robert, Frank, and their parents returned to New Mexico in the summer of 1929. Back at Berkeley that fall, Robert struggled to explain physics on a level that undergraduates could understand. By all accounts, however, he developed into a charismatic lecturer. In addition, he attracted dozens of talented graduate students. Those closest to their mentor called him “Oppie.” Robert met his colleague Ernest Orlando Lawrence, a brilliant experimental physicist and future Nobel Prize winner whose work brought in research money and allowed him to develop the Berkeley Radiation Laboratory (“Rad Lab”). Robert’s own work remained focused on theoretical physics. He developed a reputation as a brilliant synthesizer who saw at once all crucial elements of a problem, but his varied interests prevented him from focusing on one task for an extended period. As a now-confident and thriving professor in his late twenties, Robert attracted far more attention from young women than he had in his student days.
As an unmarried professor, Oppenheimer often spent social hours with his graduate students. Some of the male students even began mimicking his quirks. Oppenheimer regularly displayed both patience and generosity toward his students. In October 1931, Ella Oppenheimer died. Struggling to cope with the loss of his mother, Robert turned to the Bhagavad Gita and found comfort in Eastern mysticism. At the University of Michigan, where Oppenheimer conducted summer lectures, talented young physicist Robert Serber met him and decided to join him at Berkeley. The friendship grew so close that Oppenheimer invited Serber and his wife, Charlotte, to visit him in New Mexico in the summer of 1935. Robert Serber had connections to the Communist Party through Charlotte and her family. Although Oppenheimer read widely in the humanities, Oppenheimer had never taken much interest in practical politics. The events of the early 1930s, however, particularly the deepening Great Depression and the rise of Adolf Hitler in Germany, awakened Oppenheimer’s left-wing political consciousness.
The Preface identifies the central trauma in Oppenheimer’s life and his response to it. This places his 1954 security clearance hearing at the center of the story. Bird and Sherwin establish this hearing as the climactic and painful event to which Oppenheimer’s work leads him. The key point regarding Oppenheimer’s decision to defend himself is that neither the hearing nor his defense had much practical effect. As his friend Isidor Rabi noted during the 1954 testimony, Oppenheimer served only as a contract consultant to the General Advisory Committee of the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). If the committee members did not want to consult him, they did not have to. Thus, holding an expensive and time-consuming hearing made little sense unless the point was to humiliate Oppenheimer and thus banish his perspective from government councils altogether. Oppenheimer sensed as much, which probably helps explain his determination to fight the charges, even though he knew the outcome was predetermined. The preface hints at all these factors, especially the anguish that these events caused him.
The Prologue helps establish the framework for the book’s broader scope. Bird and Sherwin focus on the three men who delivered eulogies at Oppenheimer’s 1967 memorial service: Hans Bethe, Henry DeWolf Smyth, and George Kennan. Each man’s presence represented an important aspect of Oppenheimer’s story. Bethe was a theoretical physicist who worked under Oppenheimer at Los Alamos. Smyth was the only member of the AEC who voted to restore Oppenheimer’s security clearance in 1954. Kennan was the author of the US’s postwar containment policy and a kindred spirit of Oppenheimer’s during the early Cold War. Together, Bethe, Smyth, and Kennan reflected all the elements of Oppenheimer’s professional and public lives combined.
Part 1 describes Oppenheimer’s early life from his birth in 1904 to his experience as a young professor at Caltech and Berkeley in the mid-1930s. These seven chapters establish three parallel and crucial lines of development in Oppenheimer’s youth and early adulthood: psychological, professional, and political.
Oppenheimer was born into wealth and had an overprotective mother, which led to a sheltered upbringing. When paired with his “highbrow personality,” Oppenheimer’s sheltering made it difficult for him to form friendships (21). He thrived as a student but not in social situations among his peers. Girls largely ignored him. In Chapter 3, Bird and Sherwin introduce the theme of Mental Health Struggles, showing that at age 21 Oppenheimer had a significant mental health crisis marked by depression as well as erratic and self-destructive behavior. Additionally, they suggest that his “prolonged adolescence” ended around the time he recovered from his crisis. All of this adds important context because it shows the trajectory in his young life as he progressed from awkward despair to professional success and confidence.
Oppenheimer found this success and confidence through theoretical physics, which became his calling. In Chapter 2, Bird and Sherwin show that his interest piqued when he realized that he made a mistake by majoring in chemistry at Harvard. Then, in Chapter 3, they highlight how he discovered that he loved theoretical physics but despised laboratory experiments so thereafter pursued only theoretical physics. By the time he arrived at Berkeley, he had developed a reputation as a scholar who could bring together numerous complex ideas and arrange them in a way that produced new meaning. Unlike most academics, however, he maintained interests outside his discipline, such as poetry. These talents were formidable. Bird and Sherwin describe Oppenheimer as an “articulate synthesizer,” which made him “exactly the kind of person needed for building a world-class school of physics” (91)—and to build and manage an atomic bomb program.
Next, the authors reveal important aspects of Oppenheimer’s political development. Given his subsequent prominence in US public affairs, it might be surprising that “until about 1934, Oppenheimer displayed little interest in current events or politics” (104). He paid little attention to the mechanics of politics such as campaigns and elections, and, for the first 30 years of his life, he did not identify with parties or causes. However, he did not lack ideas or principles. In fact, Bird and Sherwin emphasize Oppenheimer’s education at the Ethical Culture School, which espoused liberalism and social consciousness. While his early schooling certainly did not make him a young activist, it cultivated his humane sensibilities and instilled dormant political ideas that the alarming world events of the 1930s awakened. Likewise, it promoted assimilation into US secular culture, which fit Oppenheimer’s inclination to diminish or even conceal his family’s Jewish heritage. In light of this heritage and his humane education, the rise of Nazism in Germany naturally awakened his political consciousness. Part 1 concludes as Oppenheimer is about to meet Jean Tatlock, the woman who later introduced him to her circle of Communist friends and thus initiated him into the world of left-wing politics, subtly introducing the theme of Suspected Communist Affiliation. Bird and Sherwin show, however, that Oppenheimer had formed many of his core ideas about the world long before meeting Communists.
Books Made into Movies
View Collection
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Books on U.S. History
View Collection
Good & Evil
View Collection
Inspiring Biographies
View Collection
Memorial Day Reads
View Collection
Military Reads
View Collection
National Book Critics Circle Award...
View Collection
Nation & Nationalism
View Collection
New York Times Best Sellers
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Pulitzer Prize Fiction Awardees &...
View Collection
Safety & Danger
View Collection
Science & Nature
View Collection
War
View Collection
World War II
View Collection