79 pages • 2 hours read
Mary WollstonecraftA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
The phrase “blind obedience” recurs throughout A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Wollstonecraft uses the phrase to describe the state of degraded dependency women are expected to show towards men. She also uses the phrase to describe the expectations that all tyrants have—whether they be kings, the wealthy, schoolteachers, or a parent or religious authority. It is not obedience Wollstonecraft objects to, but obedience that is “blind” and so does not derive from reason or independence. Essentially, the phrase “blind obedience” is part of her consistent attack levelled at all types of tyrannical power and insurmountable hierarchies that exist in society, “as blind obedience is ever sought for by power, tyrants and sensualists are in the right when they endeavour to keep women in the dark, because the former only want slaves, and the latter a play-thing” (24).
Weakness and frailty are the two primary attributes Wollstonecraft uses to describe the stereotyped woman in society. For example, Wollstonecraft quotes Fordyce as saying that women “are timid and want to be defended. They are frail” (98). Society—and men in particular—believe that women are inherently weak and frail, hence their need to be “defended” by men. Wollstonecraft argues against this depiction of women, seeing the attributes of weakness and frailty as a type of prison men have caged women in precisely so that women might remain dependent upon and subordinate to men. Society sees weakness and frailty as specifically “feminine” attributes, an idea that Wollstonecraft hopes to dismantle with her work.
Marriage serves as an important motif in this text, primarily because it is the sole task women are expected and raised to perform. Firstly, while it is possible for men to rise in station through their profession, “the only way women can rise in the world [is] by marriage” (9). Wollstonecraft does not critique or disagree with the concept of marriage—she believes in it as a cornerstone of Christianity and modesty—but does critique and disagree with the power it has over women and female behavior. As it is the only method by which women can rise in station, marriage—or achieving a successful marriage—is the sole pursuit of women. This means that their lives are centered upon acquiring pleasing attributes and on perfecting their aesthetic appearance. Such obsessions Wollstonecraft finds degrading for women. She argues that the only reason women behave like this is because they have so little power and independence, perverting marriage from a form of friendship or companionship into a relationship based on flirtation, passion, and manipulation.
The metaphor of slavery is used frequently to describe the experience of being a woman in society; in response to Fordyce’s description of women as having “soft features, and a flowing voice, a form, not robust, and demeanour delicate and gentle” (100), Wollstonecraft says of Fordyce’s description, “Is not the following portrait the portrait of a house slave” (100). Women were not, in the strictest sense, slaves to their husbands or fathers; they had a degree of independence, and were not kept literally in chains. Wollstonecraft uses the metaphor to illustrate just how confined and imprisoned women were both by the rule of men and by the roles which society imposed upon them. Women were not independent, and were expected to perform and act in one particular way; these rules and expectations were incredibly limiting for women, giving them few choices in life and almost no opportunities to escape the confines of their position.