logo

46 pages 1 hour read

Arthur Conan Doyle

A Study in Scarlet

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1887

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Character Analysis

Sherlock Holmes

Sherlock Holmes is the protagonist of the novel and an iconic literary detective. He is obsessed with discovering the truth and uses his finely tuned powers of deduction and analysis to solve criminal cases that no one else can make sense of—abilities that fuel his strong sense of superiority. Holmes is eccentric, both in his knowledge and characteristics. He has extremely deep and specific knowledge of things he deems relevant to his job, but is ostensibly ignorant in areas others would deem common knowledge. However, he arguably exaggerates this ignorance to Watson when they first meet to emphasize how invested he is in the science of deduction and in his vocation of solving mysteries. Holmes also comes across as socially inept because he is so self-absorbed and appears to have little awareness of or consideration for others. Despite his projected indifference, however, he also desires recognition and admiration. He is thrilled to be able to put on a show for Watson and never misses an opportunity to demonstrate—and then elucidate—his brilliance.



Holmes is proficient at solving mysteries because of his deductive approach. He brings an outsider’s perspective to cases, rather than relying on training or experience to cloud different possibilities; relying only on the information relevant to the case at hand, he deduces from known and observed clues rather than generalizing from similar crimes. In contrast to Gregson and Lestrade, Holmes is an exhaustive and careful observer who catches important details that they miss or don’t consider. His perspective is also different when attempting to rearrange the known facts into an accurate theory of what happened. Where Gregson and Lestrade latch onto the most obvious leads without much consideration, Holmes uses logic to look at the end result and work backwards to discover the truth. He explains to Watson that “most people, if you describe a train of events to them, will tell you what the result would be. […] There are few people, however, who, if you told them a result, would be able to evolve from their own inner consciousness what the steps were which led up to that result” (117).

John Watson

John Watson is the first-person narrator of the novel and a foil for Holmes. Everything about Watson is on the surface, whereas Holmes is mysterious, often reticent, and closed off. Where Holmes is arrogant and overconfident, Watson is self-deprecating. Moreover, unlike Holmes, who is self-absorbed and never considers those around him, Watson is a model of decorum (evident in his reluctance to ask Holmes what he does for a living at the beginning of the novel, despite his deep curiosity). Watson is typically in the dark about everything going on around him, but he is good at making observations, which makes him an ideal surrogate for the reader; as Holmes routinely explains the significance and meaning of the clues they see, readers learn alongside Watson how the crime’s solution comes together.

Watson’s complementary skills make him an ideal companion to Holmes. Watson may not have Holmes’s brain, but he is a capable military man—which is why he carries a revolver that comes in handy in dangerous situations—and is a doctor, which allows him to authenticate Hope’s heart problem. After returning from the Second Anglo-Afghan War, Watson is devoid of purpose until Holmes invites him to a crime scene, where Watson is so fascinated and impressed by Holmes that he decides to write up and publish the stories that make Holmes famous. In this way, Watson finds a calling, fills Holmes’s need to be admired and recognized, and provides the fame that brings in more clientele.

Jefferson Hope

Jefferson Hope, the murderer of Drebber and Stangerson, has a tragic story—and sympathetic motivations. Hope is resourceful, adaptable, resilient, and driven. These characteristics are evident in the variety of jobs he had before meeting Lucy, and in his ability to pursue Drebber and Stangerson across the world despite significant financial disadvantage. As a young man, he is a beacon of positivity and represents optimism about the future—an idea captured in his name and the fact he is willing to throw himself in harm's way to rescue Lucy and her father.

However, once Lucy is forced to marry Drebber and dies of a broken heart, all of Hope’s positive attributes are distorted. His love and passion are replaced by a relentless thirst for vengeance. He doggedly pursues Drebber around the world, sustained only by his desire for justice only he can deliver. His heart, once full of love, is now malfunctioning because of an aortic aneurysm; once he has finally killed Drebber and Stangerson, his heart gives out.

Hope’s role in the novel is providing Holmes with a worthy adversary. Because Holmes has become so proficient at the art of deduction, most cases are too boring for him. Further, while Holmes claims the case is simple once solved, he admits it is the most interesting one he has ever tackled. By the end, Hope and Holmes develop mutual respect, as they recognize one another's abilities. Hope is the first person to outsmart Holmes, however briefly.

Lestrade and Gregson

Inspectors Lestrade and Gregson are part of Scotland Yard, London’s police force; both come to Holmes for help with difficult cases. They resent their reliance on Holmes because of his arrogance and insistent reminders that he is their superior. However, because no one really knows about Holmes’s involvement, the two inspectors are considered two of the best detectives in London because they always take the credit.

The inadequacy of the traditional investigatory approach is front and center at Drebber’s crime scene. Holmes purposefully and methodically goes over the scene with a magnifying glass and tape measure, taking nothing as given and relying on strict deductive logic to come up with a theory that he refuses to share because he still needs more evidence. In contrast, Lestrade and Gregson fail to recognize key details about the case and pursue false leads because they are using inductive reasoning—generalizing from past experiences about likely suspects to settle for easy conclusions even if they don’t explain all of the available clues. This methodology leads to errors such as Gregson arresting the wrong man, in his hurry to best Lestrade and Holmes.

Thus, Lestrade and Gregson serve a dual purpose in the novel, highlighting the brilliance of Holmes while underscoring some of the problems inherent in law enforcement. Neither Gregson nor Lestrade seem interested in actually discovering the truth or ensuring justice is served—Gregson would have happily seen the wrong man convicted despite evidence to the contrary because it would mean closing the case before anyone else, further burnishing his reputation.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text